![]() ![]() |
May 8 2008, 10:36 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,642 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Newbury Member No.: 3,223 |
There's an unfished water near me where I've seen small rudd taking fly on a calm evening. I thought of trying for them with nymph or dry fly. Am I right that with nymph it doesn't matter what the water surface is like (though it's easier to see them rising/splashing if it's calm) but for dry fly they wouldn't see the fly so easily if it's rough?
-------------------- john clarke
|
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
May 8 2008, 10:36 PM
Post
#
|
![]() Sponsored Links |
Choose from over 6,000 digital instant download products at www.MyClickBank.co.uk. Guests - this sponsored link will vanish when you log-in. Click here to register for free. |
|
|
|
May 9 2008, 06:42 AM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,084 Joined: 5-April 01 From: East Sussex Member No.: 812 |
but for dry fly they wouldn't see the fly so easily if it's rough? ...and that's GOOD If fish see a dryfly easily in clear water and flat calm, then they tend to recognise it for what it is - fur, feather, metal, man-made fibre etc - not edible. When there is a chop on, they get a fleeting glimpse of the fly, and its "grab it or miss out". Ask any still water fly fisher. -------------------- Vagabond.
"Nothing matters very much, few things matter at all" - Plato ...only things like fresh bait and cold beer... |
|
|
|
May 9 2008, 07:00 AM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 635 Joined: 13-March 07 From: Bath UK Member No.: 11,684 |
Bit of ripple on the water is good, also helps the fish not spot you
|
|
|
|
May 9 2008, 08:36 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,306 Joined: 6-July 05 Member No.: 6,909 |
Definitely easier when there is a slight ripple. It might "drown" your fly a bit quicker but that's a small price to pay.
|
|
|
|
May 9 2008, 08:57 AM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,254 Joined: 16-January 06 From: Oxford Member No.: 8,161 |
As everyone has said, a slight ripple is best to help disguise the leader and fly, but even a flat calm is OK, especially at dusk (the best time for rudd). For flies, try to match whatever they're taking - probably small gnats, etc. (emerging buzzers). You could try a team of small buzzers or maybe (on a 3-fly team) one dry gnat, an emerger, and something like a dry hawthorn.
I've been thinking about doing the same thing actually, so let us know how you do! -------------------- And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music
|
|
|
|
May 9 2008, 09:58 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,303 Joined: 20-February 05 From: Balmoral, Scotland Member No.: 6,213 |
Most of my fishing (until recently) has been on the fly and I don't have a problem with a dry fly and calm water. Instead of a fly that floats high in the water, look for something that sits right in the surface film, what we call an emerger. My choice would be a Shipmans Buzzer
http://www.yorkshireflyfishing.org.uk/inde...p;page=shipmans The leader should be degreased so that it doesn't float (important that) and the fly can have a tiny bit of floatant, probably at just one end. Fished correctly it lays flat and just makes a dimple in the surface. It should just be on the point of sinking. Fished in the evening I would put money on it. Enjoy -------------------- Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be.
|
|
|
|
May 9 2008, 09:22 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,642 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Newbury Member No.: 3,223 |
Thanks - lots of helpful advice.
But I guess there's a point where the ripple becomes too much like waves? -------------------- john clarke
|
|
|
|
May 12 2008, 02:54 PM
Post
#8
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,084 Joined: 5-April 01 From: East Sussex Member No.: 812 |
But I guess there's a point where the ripple becomes too much like waves? Not really, I have fished (and caught) on Highland and Hebridean lochs where there has been a two foot lop. Come to that, there can be fair chop on the salt flats at times - you have to take the rough with the smooth, as in life -------------------- Vagabond.
"Nothing matters very much, few things matter at all" - Plato ...only things like fresh bait and cold beer... |
|
|
|
May 12 2008, 10:33 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,642 Joined: 30-December 02 From: Newbury Member No.: 3,223 |
Thanks - useful stuff - but I wonder if it might be different with rudd?
I went again today to a lake where they were rising all round the lake yesterday evening when it was calm - admittedly very small fish as far as I could see - but today, with waves on the water, there was not a rise to be seen, until the wind dropped, briefly, and they started rising, though not as many as yesterday. I guess it could partly be that i didn't see the rises because of the disturbance on the water, but I'm sure it wasn't only that. -------------------- john clarke
|
|
|
|
May 13 2008, 08:56 AM
Post
#10
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,254 Joined: 16-January 06 From: Oxford Member No.: 8,161 |
Thinking about it, I rarely see Rudd topping unless it's calm - but as you say, that may be because they're more difficult to see when it's choppy.
When it's calm you may have to fish very fine, light tippets and small flies, so be careful not to snap off on the strike. -------------------- And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
| Topic Title | Replies | Topic Starter | Views | Last Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
69 | Stefan | 4,857 | Yesterday, 08:30 AM Last post by: BoldBear |
|||
![]() |
11 | clint_suffolk | 1,909 | 31st October 2007 - 12:44 PM Last post by: BoldBear |
|||
![]() |
8 | budgie2004 | 1,801 | 16th March 2008 - 05:58 PM Last post by: Zoki@Serbia |
|||
![]() |
1 | Elton | 718 | 21st January 2004 - 11:37 PM Last post by: Tim Kelly |
|||
![]() |
13 | tommo666 | 863 | 11th July 2005 - 04:29 PM Last post by: tommo666 |
|||
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th May 2008 - 10:50 AM |
Navigation
spacer