AnglersNet    

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Support Anglers' Net

2 Pages V   1 2 >  Digg this topic · Save to del.icio.us · Slashdot It · Post to Technorati · Post to Furl · Submit to Reddit · Share on Facebook · Fark It · Googlize This Post · Add to ma.gnolia · Tag to Wink · Add to MyWeb · Add to Netscape
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> A Draft Marine Bill
Marine Bill
post Apr 3 2008, 01:27 PM
Post #1


Junior Member
*

Group: Members
Posts: 20
Joined: 29-September 05
Member No.: 7,384



http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/consult/...tmarinebill.pdf

The future............ plenty in there to go on I am sure, at 686 pages it might take a while to download let alone digest
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sponsored Links
post Apr 3 2008, 01:27 PM
Post #


Sponsored Links















Choose from over 6,000 digital instant download products at www.MyClickBank.co.uk.

Guests - this sponsored link will vanish when you log-in. Click here to register for free.
Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
Leon Roskilly
post Apr 3 2008, 01:43 PM
Post #2


Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 8,680
Joined: 20-January 00
From: Rainham, Kent
Member No.: 7



See also

http://www.sacn.org.uk/Conservation-and-Po...arine_Bill.html


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ryford
post Apr 3 2008, 02:24 PM
Post #3


Junior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 94
Joined: 8-July 04
Member No.: 5,207



3.92 and 3.105 could prove interesting
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
barry luxton
post Apr 3 2008, 05:07 PM
Post #4


Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,206
Joined: 19-October 06
From: rochester
Member No.: 10,666



QUOTE(Marine Bill @ Apr 3 2008, 01:27 PM) *
http://www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/consult/...tmarinebill.pdf

The future............ plenty in there to go on I am sure, at 686 pages it might take a while to download let alone digest


Just wondering how much more of this dirge we gotta consider before we go fishing without them on our backs, Haven't even had time to get over the rsa consultation yet and this lot is thrown at us.
Defra are certainly making a massive industry out of this uk paperwork fishing ltd.


--------------------
Live ones, not dead ones.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
steve good
post Apr 3 2008, 08:14 PM
Post #5


Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 786
Joined: 4-January 06
Member No.: 8,050



QUOTE(barry luxton @ Apr 3 2008, 05:07 PM) *
Just wondering how much more of this dirge we gotta consider before we go fishing without them on our backs, Haven't even had time to get over the rsa consultation yet and this lot is thrown at us.
Defra are certainly making a massive industry out of this uk paperwork fishing ltd.


Hi Barry

Defra have the greens on their back they got to do what they say Goverment earn over £100,000,000 from aggregate dredging,
the greens will say nothing about that if defra do what the greens say thats what this is all about

anglers and commercials are in the same boat except anglers are in the green camp.

We, anglers and commercials are going to be eaten by the greens.

Reasoning, goverment signed the international UN agreement on bio and geo bio-diversity and the EU habitat laws

Greens got goverment over the barrel

steve
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
H.A.
post Apr 3 2008, 08:27 PM
Post #6


Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 924
Joined: 8-September 03
From: An island between Selsey and Portsea Island
Member No.: 4,188



QUOTE
..... anglers are in the green camp.

Greens got goverment over the barrel


Who are these all powerful 'mysterons'?

rolleyes.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
glennk
post Apr 4 2008, 07:11 AM
Post #7


Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,442
Joined: 19-March 06
Member No.: 8,912



Anglers are in the green camp allright.

With angling/green friends like this one who needs enemies.

http://www.wwf.org.uk/marineact/fairshare.asp

"SOMETHING MUST BE DONE" says SACN's Dave Morton

Will Dave Morton and the SACN be fighting for full compensation including future loss of livelihood for the charter skippers that will be put out of business ?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
H.A.
post Apr 4 2008, 08:21 AM
Post #8


Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 924
Joined: 8-September 03
From: An island between Selsey and Portsea Island
Member No.: 4,188



QUOTE
Will Dave Morton and the SACN be fighting for full compensation including future loss of livelihood for the charter skippers that will be put out of business ?
- Glenn

I'm not sure what the link is here, Glenn?

Are you saying that the highly protected marine parks will be designated especially where charter boats operate?
I would have thought this would be exactly what the quite stringent and thorough secondary consultation processes laid down will be all about?

I would have thought RSAs can only benefit from access to some/most of these inshore areas where commercial trawling/dredging will be prohibited?

The emphasis seemed to be on 'dangerous and damaging' practices on sensitive areas and nursery areas. Unless a direct link between RSA activity and 'damaging' activities is made, then it looks as if this would be beneficial to anglers, even if the cost is what other properly developed and managed sportfishing regions have had for years, in the form of bag-limits.

What is certain is that some actions need to be taken against activities which most certainly are damaging to the habitats and stocks therein.

dry.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
glennk
post Apr 4 2008, 09:06 AM
Post #9


Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,442
Joined: 19-March 06
Member No.: 8,912



Not about marine parks HA, although no doubt that will be another problem. This is SACN's contribution to a propaganda video about the state of our seas. In the video you see an expert north east boat angler (not) demanding that something must be done. The video portrays a barren sea off the north east coast with nothing but "tiny tiny" fish.

Obviously this isn't the case I have many many pictures of big fish caught off our coast and lots of them.

What harm done you might say, its only a video. However when you do a little analysis of the page you find out :

123 .edu websites link here. (Colleges and universities)

37 .gov websites link here. (Government websites)

and a google page rank of 5 which is higher than the busiest angling forums.

Then you can start to see just how much damage a propaganda video like this can do when you get anglers on their saying something must be done, and government bodies watching that and then linking to it from their websites.

The next thing that must be done is compensation for our local charter fleet.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
wurzel
post Apr 4 2008, 09:08 AM
Post #10


Member
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 2,349
Joined: 1-March 05
Member No.: 6,262



QUOTE(H.A. @ Apr 4 2008, 08:21 AM) *
- Glenn

I'm not sure what the link is here, Glenn?

Are you saying that the highly protected marine parks will be designated especially where charter boats operate?
I would have thought this would be exactly what the quite stringent and thorough secondary consultation processes laid down will be all about?

I would have thought RSAs can only benefit from access to some/most of these inshore areas where commercial trawling/dredging will be prohibited?

The emphasis seemed to be on 'dangerous and damaging' practices on sensitive areas and nursery areas. Unless a direct link between RSA activity and 'damaging' activities is made, then it looks as if this would be beneficial to anglers, even if the cost is what other properly developed and managed sportfishing regions have had for years, in the form of bag-limits.

What is certain is that some actions need to be taken against activities which most certainly are damaging to the habitats and stocks therein.

dry.gif


It's the bag limits that the Whitby charter fleet are worried about, it will alter the whole perspective of not only the charter fleet but all angling along the southern North sea coast.

Quote
What is certain is that some actions need to be taken against activities which most certainly are damaging to the habitats and stocks therein.

With stocks already steadily increasing you have no proof of that, especially in the Whitby area.


--------------------
I fish to live and live to fish.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Google
 


2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Collapse

> Similar Topics

    Topic Title Replies Topic Starter Views Last Action
No New Posts  
11 Tony 1 270 11th January 2004 - 12:19 AM
Last post by: Mark Okun
No New Posts  
8 Elton 172 19th October 2005 - 07:02 AM
Last post by: Brumagem Phil
No New Posts  
7 Pangolin 178 30th December 2004 - 08:00 AM
Last post by: chevin
No New Posts  
6 Leon Roskilly 91 4th November 2004 - 05:24 AM
Last post by: Bruno Broughton
No new  
22 Bob on Stronsay 482 18th August 2005 - 11:50 PM
Last post by: sam-cox



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 17th May 2008 - 09:39 AM


> Navigation

spacer

> Advertisments


More Discount
Fishing Tackle

Offers from
Tacklebargains


Some Great
Deals From
FishTec