Jump to content

Lift Method


James P

Recommended Posts

Having just made a rake to use on my local canal, i'm looking forward to going down in the evenings and fishing the lift method for Tench (and any rogue Bream or Carp).

 

I used to be a match angler who would sit on 14.5 - 16m of pole for 5 hrs but i'm morphing into a roving specialist angler in a Mr Crabtree keep it simple style which i'm enjoying immensely!!

 

I'd like to know what is the range limit when fishing the lift method. I realise it's a close method of fishing but the canal is only 3-4 rods lengths in width at most so i'd like to think I could fish comfortably withing this range. Is this so?

 

I'll probably be fishing corn or bread - how close does the shot need to be to the bait to give sensitive presentation but still register the classic lift bite?

 

Cheers

 

James

"if i'm not back in 5 minutes, just wait longer!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having just made a rake to use on my local canal, i'm looking forward to going down in the evenings and fishing the lift method for Tench (and any rogue Bream or Carp).

 

I used to be a match angler who would sit on 14.5 - 16m of pole for 5 hrs but i'm morphing into a roving specialist angler in a Mr Crabtree keep it simple style which i'm enjoying immensely!!

 

I'd like to know what is the range limit when fishing the lift method. I realise it's a close method of fishing but the canal is only 3-4 rods lengths in width at most so i'd like to think I could fish comfortably withing this range. Is this so?

 

I'll probably be fishing corn or bread - how close does the shot need to be to the bait to give sensitive presentation but still register the classic lift bite?

 

Cheers

 

James

 

I've fished lift method up to about 3-4 rod lengths out with no real problems in the past.

 

As a rule I never placed my shot within 3inches of the hook bait and quite often had it even further.

 

I'm no oracle on the method but this has worked for me with reasonable success

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've fished lift method up to about 3-4 rod lengths out with no real problems in the past.

 

As a rule I never placed my shot within 3inches of the hook bait and quite often had it even further.

 

I'm no oracle on the method but this has worked for me with reasonable success

 

I use the lift method a lot in the summer - probably my favourite summer tactic. I usually have the shot around 2-3 inches from the hook - rarely any longer...

 

 

C.

"Study to be quiet." ><((º> My Blog

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tried the lift method on the Oxford canal last year and had no end of trouble with the flow. It's a great stillwater tactic but in flowing water it can be a bit of a nightmare. I guess it depends on what your canal is like (I don't have much experience of them). Maybe you could use a very slim float and a very big shot? That might help.

 

You can fish it 3-4 rodlengths out no problem.

And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lift4.jpg

 

 

INTRODUCTION

the lift method is simplisity its self use a large splitshot as wieght and attach your float via a float band[A](rubber)if its not too weedy you can put your line through the floats eye as well any shortish float will do but a strait waggler would be a good one to use (one without a incert)it works better with your float set over depth [fig2] and with about 2 inches showing above the water so when it liftsit may even fall flat on the water[C]or it can just slip away[D]as the fish moves off.set your weight 4-6in from the hook .the fish has to tilt it's self down to pick up your bait then rite iteself in order to eat it and as it picks up your bait it surports the weight of your anchor shot and as it raises it's head the float will rise upas there's no weight to keep it down in the water(thats why it's best to use a light un weighted float)giving the LIFT, now sometimes the fish will move off while picking up your bait pulling your float under.[D]

 

fig 1

lift1.jpg

 

 

fig 2

lift2.jpg

 

 

Alternative Method

 

another method that will allow you to fish further out than the standard lift method is a scaled down slider rig with the bulk shot set 2/3 depth and the important telltale shot/counter balance shot with gives the lift indication on the float which is put onto your line free running and the depth is set by a sliding stop knot

 

lift3.gif

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

the float used needs to be very boyant (enough to suspend ½ of the anchor weight )

The weight has too be between 2-4" away from the hook (any further and you loose the sensativity of the setup) as thats the dstance the average fish has too dip / bow down too feed off the bottom ,then right themself's to swollow it down .This lifting of there heads is what gives the lift effect as the fish suports the anchor weight (¾ ) ,the boyancy of the float causes it to pop up & even out the water to lay flat whilst suporting some of the anchor weights capacity ,meaning the the fsh feels very little of the anchors weight / resistance .making the whole rig very sensative.the weight needes to be suficiant to hold position on the bottom (anchoring the whole rig in place) you set the float way over depth and wind down to cock the float & in open water the line from the is at a 40-45* angle (unless your fishing right upto lillybeds ect) from the weight .Fishing tight to lilly beds etc you set the float over the weght or just a small angle .

 

if the fish does feel any weight it bolts dragging the float under & usually hooks itself (this is a unbalanced setup ,but still works) .

 

i hope this helps

owls22dx.gif

Chavender
I try to be funny... but sometimes I merely look it! hello.gif Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What makes this method work is that the FLOAT supports the weight, not the fish. The weight lifted by the fish is the same as that amount of water previously displaced by the volume of float tip that is lifted out of the water. So if you have a fine float tip the fish should feel practically nothing even if it is lifting a swan shot. Try and read Dick Walker's explanation from years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What makes this method work is that the FLOAT supports the weight, not the fish. The weight lifted by the fish is the same as that amount of water previously displaced by the volume of float tip that is lifted out of the water. So if you have a fine float tip the fish should feel practically nothing even if it is lifting a swan shot. Try and read Dick Walker's explanation from years ago.

 

I can see the logic in that Colin. Quite a simple displacement theory - it shouldn't matter what size float is used then (within reason!), as long as it is matched to the weight to be as close to neutral buoyancy as possible.

 

Thanks for the great pics and info Chavender.

Edited by James P

"if i'm not back in 5 minutes, just wait longer!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What makes this method work is that the FLOAT supports the weight, not the fish. The weight lifted by the fish is the same as that amount of water previously displaced by the volume of float tip that is lifted out of the water. So if you have a fine float tip the fish should feel practically nothing even if it is lifting a swan shot. Try and read Dick Walker's explanation from years ago.

 

Surely it can't work like that; if the float can support that weight you wouldn't be able to cock it in the first place, it would repeatedly lie flat when you tighten down to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely it can't work like that; if the float can support that weight you wouldn't be able to cock it in the first place, it would repeatedly lie flat when you tighten down to it.

 

:rolleyes: I remember this argument running for about six weeks in the Angling Times in about 1972, so I'm not getting into it again! I trusted Dick Walker's view as the correct one then and, as now an engineer myself, I still do :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.