Jump to content

Discrimination

andy_youngs

By andy_youngs
in Conservation & Politics

 Share

Recommended Posts

andy_youngs Member

andy_youngs

Posted
  • Author
Posted
drop it ain't worth the hassel.

Nope, I don't choose to do that Barry. I want to fight it. Don't worry, I'll keep you informed. But I'm mightily p*****d off at the moment.

never try and teach a pig to sing .... it wastes your time and it annoys the pig

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted
Nope, I don't choose to do that Barry. I want to fight it. Don't worry, I'll keep you informed. But I'm mightily p*****d off at the moment.

 

What you want to acheive, money? let back in? satisfaction? Na, stay on here and get your word across that canoe access is an equal right as to any other river user. You will be more respected than if you choose the other route, win or loose. my opinion btw.

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ayjay Member

ayjay

Posted
Posted
No will do.

This is a live dispute.

 

It's only when you've eventually grown out of the "angry young man" phase, that you''ll realise that both Barry and I are correct.

 

We've all been there, it doesn't work - chill out, move on, and devote your time and energy to something more rewarding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
andy_youngs Member

andy_youngs

Posted
  • Author
Posted
What you want to acheive, money? let back in? satisfaction? Na, stay on here and get your word across that canoe access is an equal right as to any other river user. You will be more respected than if you choose the other route, win or loose. my opinion btw.

 

I don't want money. And I don't want to be let back in to anything. All I want is to be able to paddle down my local river without some fascist thug jumping out and accosting me.

 

And if that does happen, then I want the law to back me up and inform the accoster that he is engaged in antisocial behaviour.

 

It ain't happening at the moment, hence my unhappiness.

never try and teach a pig to sing .... it wastes your time and it annoys the pig

Link to comment
Share on other sites
andy_youngs Member

andy_youngs

Posted
  • Author
Posted
It's only when you've eventually grown out of the "angry young man" phase, that you''ll realise that both Barry and I are correct.

 

We've all been there, it doesn't work - chill out, move on, and devote your time and energy to something more rewarding.

I agree, we've all been there. And sometimes you need to draw a line in the sand. I choose to devote my time and energy to this cause, because I believe a massive injustice is being perpetrated. The public is being lied to.

 

I grew out of the angry young man phase many years ago. I'm now in the angry old man phase.

never try and teach a pig to sing .... it wastes your time and it annoys the pig

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Steve Walker Member

Steve Walker

Posted
Posted

It's a private website, it's their ball and they've taken it in.

 

If we had an anti-angling animal rights activist joining AN to put his views across, would it be unreasonable of Elton to ban him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
andy_youngs Member

andy_youngs

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)
If we had an anti-angling animal rights activist joining AN to put his views across, would it be unreasonable of Elton to ban him?

Yes, it would. It would be akin to banning someone from a pub because you didn't like the colour of his jacket.

 

As long as the anti-angling animal rights activist doesn't ram it down it down your throat in an inflammitory way, then he's allowed to post, and he's allowed to buy you a pint of beer, and you are allowed to talk to him. Because every pub is a parliament.

Edited by andy_youngs

never try and teach a pig to sing .... it wastes your time and it annoys the pig

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Phone Member

Phone

Posted
Posted

andy,

 

Well, I see your point. Our biytch was inculcated in the rallying cry of the American Revolution: No Taxation Without Representation. What were you paying to voice an opinion on this other site. Makes perfect sense if you paid by the word or letter.

 

As for your post above this one. You're kidding right? Do you consider every forum on the internet "public"? Does the owner have any "rights" of censorship?

 

You say "ram"? You don't seem to have much wiggle room in your opinion. What's that all about?

 

Phone

Link to comment
Share on other sites
andy_youngs Member

andy_youngs

Posted
  • Author
Posted
What were you paying to voice an opinion on this other site. Makes perfect sense if you paid by the word or letter.

 

As for your post above this one. You're kidding right? Do you consider every forum on the internet "public"? Does the owner have any "rights" of censorship?

Phone

I didn't pay a penny. And I also wasn't kidding in the post above this one. The owner has rights to moderate abusive posts. But he doesn't have the right to set up a public forum, harvest the advertising revenue, and then ban people from the forum just because they hold views that he happens to disagree with.

 

The fishing magic forum was quite happy to publish my article about mahseer fishing on the Karnali River in Nepal a few years ago, and benefit from the advertising revenue that flowed from that.

 

They received that benefit for free. I didn't charge them for my input.

 

All I'm after is justice ....

never try and teach a pig to sing .... it wastes your time and it annoys the pig

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cleeclive Member

cleeclive

Posted
Posted
I didn't pay a penny. And I also wasn't kidding in the post above this one. The owner has rights to moderate abusive posts. But he doesn't have the right to set up a public forum, harvest the advertising revenue, and then ban people from the forum just because they hold views that he happens to disagree with.

 

The fishing magic forum was quite happy to publish my article about mahseer fishing on the Karnali River in Nepal a few years ago, and benefit from the advertising revenue that flowed from that.

 

They received that benefit for free. I didn't charge them for my input.

 

All I'm after is justice ....

Ummm, an interesting one, there is a big difference between angry young man and angry old man and I think that "Victor Meldrew" comes to mind with the latter, its kind of anger with the wisdom to realise that sometimes you are on a hiding to nothing but it is satisfying to be Victor Meldrew for an hour and irritate the wife a bit more with your moaning. Life is full of injustice but at least you have had a sympathetic hearing in this site.

It seems to be a very complex legal issue paddling in fresh water, I spent 20 years messing about eel fishing , mostly poaching and never really had any hassle, but it has changed, Joe public are now a lot more environmentally aware and tend to report anything they see to the environment agency. It has taken the fun out of poaching, so I stopped around 18 years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.

  I accept