Jump to content

more fiddling g!ts


Recommended Posts

Wonder where abouts these cowboys were clearing out. Wonder how much they were not caught for. Fiddling barst@wards.

 

http://www.fishupdate.com/news/fullstory.p...lers_fined.html

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 29
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

At the moment it doesn't feel like I have any rights at all to a resource , with a stop on skate fishing and a stop on cod fishing and a small sole quota, while anglers are free to do what they like and judging by the amounts of cod that have been coming ashore from the angling boats that moor near us are also less than acceptable with regard to equal rights to a resource.
- Our 'Wurzel'

 

Brings tears to mee eye to read this kind of thing!

Can't these tear-jerkers be edited out, Mods?

 

<_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you used the 'report' button on a post that bothered you, we could at least have a look at it in context and decide to leave it or alter it or remove it.

 

This way does nothing good for anyone unless you just wanted to have a pop.

" My choices in life were either to be a piano player in a whore house or a politician. And to tell the truth, there's hardly any difference!" - Harry Truman, 33rd US President

Link to comment
Share on other sites

looks like the original comment was removed but I see a quote which seems to take a few shots at anglers. However your firing in the wrong direction. All the quota for the small under 10's has been redistributed to the big boys at your expense. If all the quota lies with a few then its easier to "manage B) ". Its them you should have a gripe with. Also remember that if the charter anglers end up in your quota pool that again will mean less for you as they will be taking from the same pot. There does seem to be an injustice but shooting at those who cannot help you will by no means pull you out of the myre. The charter skippers I know have a great deal of sympathy for people in your situation and if they could would do anything to help you out of it.

Edited by glennk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't these tear-jerkers be edited out, Mods?
- H.A.

 

Was it that comment which caught your eye, Newt? If so, I'm sorry ....

 

it was meant tongue-in-cheek!

 

:rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest challenge
looks like the original comment was removed but I see a quote which seems to take a few shots at anglers. However your firing in the wrong direction. All the quota for the small under 10's has been redistributed to the big boys at your expense. If all the quota lies with a few then its easier to "manage B) ". Its them you should have a gripe with. Also remember that if the charter anglers end up in your quota pool that again will mean less for you as they will be taking from the same pot. There does seem to be an injustice but shooting at those who cannot help you will by no means pull you out of the myre. The charter skippers I know have a great deal of sympathy for people in your situation and if they could would do anything to help you out of it.

That’s a good point glen about the quota pool. Unfortunately for the charter skippers and there customers, if they where to be allocated the same amount of quota that the under 10,s get there season would be over before it started. Also the same stringent enforcements and the consequences of that enforcement would apply. Let’s hope that for the wellbeing of recreational sea angling, it never goes down that road.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also the same stringent enforcements and the consequences of that enforcement would apply.

 

Evening Challenge, how easy, hard is it for a sfc boat to spot non-licenced boats, hobby netters taking the proverbial and fishing for a living? Any warnings or court cases?

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Evening Challenge, how easy, hard is it for a sfc boat to spot non-licenced boats, hobby netters taking the proverbial and fishing for a living? Any warnings or court cases?

 

Sorry to butt in Barry but, as I understand it, the problem isn't spotting unlicenced or unregistered boats, that's easy. The problem is knowing whether they are selling their catch. Any unlicenced boat owner can use whatever method they like to catch fish, including gill nets. There's no restriction on the amount of nets they can use, either. I could fish as much gill net as I could fit onto my 17ft Dory, (which, if you believe everything you read, could be as much as 15 miles of the stuff, :rolleyes: , lol :D ), and as long as the fish I caught was for personal consumption, I wouldn't be doing anything illegal.

DRUNK DRIVERS WRECK LIVES.

 

Don't drink and drive.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Na you carry on Steve more the merrier. 15 miles of netting. Don't suppose anyone has thought of towing a dingy, you could load the stuff on that, reach the mark and throw it off the back. :lol::lol: Much like a car trailer. The difficulty would be if you have to go in reverse, much like a car trailer. :D:D

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.