Jump to content

Higher Minimum Legal Size Must Apply To All To Save Bass


Anglers' Net

Recommended Posts

An EU proposal to raise the minimum legal size for bass must apply to

all those fishing for them – that’s the message the Angling Trust has

sent to top decision makers at the EU and member of an EU working party

who will be discussing further emergency measures for bass in Brussels

tomorrow following the ban on pelagic trawling that was introduced

earlier this month.

 

Click here to view the full article. Please reply below to add your comments, if any.

Try our newTackle & Bait Finder
http://www.anglersnet.co.uk/fishingtackle/




Grab yourself an amazing bargain at http://www.cheap-bargains.co.uk/

USING THE LINKS ABOVE IS A WAY THAT YOU CAN HELP KEEP ANGLERS' NET FREE!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Indications coming out of the EU have been that the new proposed minimum size of 42cm would only apply to recreational catches while commercial fishermen would continue to be able to harvest immature bass at 36cm"

 

Proposal to limit anglers and not commercials - what are they smoking in Brussels and Strasbourg?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

French take commercially, artisanal and rsa many thousands of tonnes more than the u k's The French take is 000000's of tonnes, the u k take is in the hundreds, yet the maniacs' TAT BASS and the hangers on are looking for 4 month close season and bag limits to decimate the charter boat industry and the inshore commercials. Fatty Mitchell who isn't even a rsa rep, TAT doesn't have any and his ilk are even calling for the commercials to go rod and line only. Without any consideration that rod and line takes equal amounts as do the trawling and netting efforts in the u k. That'll be less than 300 tonne. Just who are the loonies.

Edited by barry luxton

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.