Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Petition the PM, on-line in 2 mins, to save the fish stocks


  • Please log in to reply
292 replies to this topic

#1 fishyrob

fishyrob

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 86 posts
  • Interests:Fishing!!

Posted 22 November 2006 - 06:57 PM

Not sure if this link has appeared on AnglersNet, so for the good of my childrens fishing, here is a link to a petition, that will remain open for one year. Wether it will have any influence remains to be seen, but it definately wont if nobody signs it. Perhaps one of the moderators could sticky it?
It really will only take two minutes of your time.
http://petitions.pm..../Seafishstocks/
http://petitions.pm..../Seafishstocks/ IF YOU WANT TO SAVE OUR FISH STOCKS

#2 Norm B

Norm B

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,246 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hampshire UK
  • Interests:Sea Angling, Conservation and shooting.

Posted 22 November 2006 - 07:01 PM

Not sure if this link has appeared on AnglersNet, so for the good of my childrens fishing, here is a link to a petition, that will remain open for one year. Wether it will have any influence remains to be seen, but it definately wont if nobody signs it. Perhaps one of the moderators could sticky it?
It really will only take two minutes of your time.
http://petitions.pm..../Seafishstocks/

:clap2: Signed. :clap2:

#3 barry luxton

barry luxton

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,348 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:rochester
  • Interests:Boat fishing and more boat fishing. Some times i have to go to work so it does interfere with my boat fishing, but not much.

Posted 22 November 2006 - 07:06 PM

Not sure if this link has appeared on AnglersNet, so for the good of my childrens fishing, here is a link to a petition, that will remain open for one year. Wether it will have any influence remains to be seen, but it definately wont if nobody signs it. Perhaps one of the moderators could sticky it?
It really will only take two minutes of your time.
http://petitions.pm..../Seafishstocks/



I cannot agree with this petition as it is against one part of the whole fishing scene. If you wish to create ntz it has to be that every one suffers for the benifit of all. Not just commercial.

Regards barry, dedicated rsa.

 Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.

 
New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.
 
Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.
 
Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.
 
new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.
 
Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because  they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are.. 


#4 fishyrob

fishyrob

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 86 posts
  • Interests:Fishing!!

Posted 22 November 2006 - 07:08 PM

B)-->
QUOTE(Norm B @ Nov 22 2006, 07:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

:clap2: Signed. :clap2:
[/quote]

A link in your very fine publication would reach a lot of people........ <_<
http://petitions.pm..../Seafishstocks/ IF YOU WANT TO SAVE OUR FISH STOCKS

#5 fishyrob

fishyrob

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 86 posts
  • Interests:Fishing!!

Posted 22 November 2006 - 07:13 PM

I cannot agree with this petition as it is against one part of the whole fishing scene. If you wish to create ntz it has to be that every one suffers for the benifit of all. Not just commercial.

Regards barry, dedicated rsa.


I totally agree with you. An NTZ should be exactly that. But you should sign, as with no fish stocks there is no commercial fishing at all ever again. Wheras this petition campaigns for a period of ten years, and is supported by scientific advice. So, if you are truly in support of commercial fishing, surely you have no choice but to sign?
http://petitions.pm..../Seafishstocks/ IF YOU WANT TO SAVE OUR FISH STOCKS

#6 frankthebass

frankthebass

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 180 posts

Posted 22 November 2006 - 07:47 PM

Could this be moved to the concervation forums?
THEY DONT LIKE IT UP EM THE FUZZY WUZZIES, THEY DONT LIKE IT UP EM!

#7 essexbuoy

essexbuoy

    Member

  • Anglers' Net Contributor
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 184 posts

Posted 22 November 2006 - 08:01 PM

So let me get this right, this petition is for a TOTAL ban on ALL commercial fishing for 10 years.......

#8 barry luxton

barry luxton

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,348 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:rochester
  • Interests:Boat fishing and more boat fishing. Some times i have to go to work so it does interfere with my boat fishing, but not much.

Posted 22 November 2006 - 08:02 PM

So let me get this right, this petition is for a TOTAL ban on ALL commercial fishing for 10 years.......



Er no. its asking for 'areas'

 Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.

 
New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.
 
Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.
 
Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.
 
new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.
 
Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because  they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are.. 


#9 barry luxton

barry luxton

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,348 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:rochester
  • Interests:Boat fishing and more boat fishing. Some times i have to go to work so it does interfere with my boat fishing, but not much.

Posted 22 November 2006 - 08:13 PM

I totally agree with you. An NTZ should be exactly that. But you should sign, as with no fish stocks there is no commercial fishing at all ever again. Wheras this petition campaigns for a period of ten years, and is supported by scientific advice. So, if you are truly in support of commercial fishing, surely you have no choice but to sign?



In my mind this petition is badley drawn up. It is preduditial against commercial fishing and could also affect wet fish shops, chip shops etc, etc. This would be better directed to the people who make the rules regarding the seas around the uk namely the eu, they are the ones who's ears need bending. I also have two choices and wish to make my own mind up, not to be dictated to as to how i should vote, surely.

regards barry

 Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.

 
New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.
 
Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.
 
Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.
 
new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.
 
Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because  they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are.. 


#10 mr motorola

mr motorola

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,818 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Erm , Planet Earth.............i think , but i'm still not sure!

Posted 22 November 2006 - 08:41 PM

And so the arguments begin again......................................



No - one on here is ever gonna influence the powers in charge, you may aswell get your fishing tackle out and get some fishing done! :thumbs: :fishing1:
Fishing is fishing , Life is life , but life wouldn't be very enjoyable without fishing................ Mr M 12:03 / 19-3-2009