Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

AT Misdeeds (was "well hello got a question")


  • Please log in to reply
28 replies to this topic

#21 Phone

Phone

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,110 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:American West - USA

Posted 12 September 2016 - 04:10 AM

wotnob,

 

Looks like a private conversation to me.  Your post peaked my interest (why?) so I took a look and now I too have butted in. 

Don't bother me - it's just Barry

 

Phone



#22 barry luxton

barry luxton

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,443 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:rochester
  • Interests:Boat fishing and more boat fishing. Some times i have to go to work so it does interfere with my boat fishing, but not much.

Posted 12 September 2016 - 05:53 AM

your more than welcome phone, more the merrier

 

TAT are arranging restrictions for our angling following private conversations amongst themselves. They bothered no rsa what so ever before they started the ball rolling rushing off to parliament, screaming for bass restrictions using dodgy info.

 

Keep it out in the open I say more openness and accountability the better.

 

The u k has just had an open and free referendum, the rsa get nothing apart from sneaky, pathetic poor representation at best, followed by unwarranted, unrealistic restrictions. Go read Norms post re restrictions it's the truth, nothing hidden nor private.


 Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.

 
New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.
 
Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.
 
Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.
 
new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.
 
Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because  they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are.. 


#23 Norm B

Norm B

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,247 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hampshire UK
  • Interests:Sea Angling, Conservation and shooting.

Posted 12 September 2016 - 09:24 AM

I agree how about the angling trusts news section for balance as opposed to their sanitised news releases?

:clap3: Ho, ho, ho, it will never happen, honest, open and frank discussion with the AT, dream on.  :clap3:



#24 barry luxton

barry luxton

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,443 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:rochester
  • Interests:Boat fishing and more boat fishing. Some times i have to go to work so it does interfere with my boat fishing, but not much.

Posted 12 September 2016 - 06:06 PM

Those b...........ds are claiming to represent the rsa, no one has asked them to. And they don't have an open channel to the rsa, never have. So they are a pie in the sky selfish org, except they are being paid monies by ngo's  with regards to so called conservation and as such have the governments ear by the back door and offer up the rsa industry on a plate for restriction.

 

They are nothing short of gutless, pathetic and faceless while causing damage to an industry that ain't broke or needs their sort of fixing. 

 

One good thing as the vote is out of the euopeon nightmare, TAT can no longer drag the rsa into the mire of the commons fishery policy and as such there is no need for TAT to pump anglers monies and also ngo money into the other useless org known as the europeon anglers alliance.


 Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.

 
New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.
 
Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.
 
Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.
 
new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.
 
Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because  they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are.. 


#25 Newt

Newt

    Administrator

  • Admin
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 28,148 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Edgemoor, South Carolina, USA
  • Interests:fishing, duplicate bridge, fishing, RV (caravan) travel to where there is fishing

Posted 13 September 2016 - 06:54 AM

Moved from the New section to a more appropriate location.


" My choices in life were either to be a piano player in a whore house or a politician. And to tell the truth, there's hardly any difference!" - Harry Truman, 33rd US President

#26 Norm B

Norm B

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,247 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hampshire UK
  • Interests:Sea Angling, Conservation and shooting.

Posted 14 September 2016 - 10:53 AM

Moved from the New section to a more appropriate location.

:cry: Where to?  :cry:



#27 barry luxton

barry luxton

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,443 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:rochester
  • Interests:Boat fishing and more boat fishing. Some times i have to go to work so it does interfere with my boat fishing, but not much.

Posted 14 September 2016 - 05:39 PM

:cry: Where to?  :cry:

 

 

Do behave Norm, no it hasn't gone into file 13. B)

 

it's gone to conservation and politics, now we all know TAT are good for conservation except the fit and healthy rsa industry who they appear want to destroy.


Edited by barry luxton, 15 September 2016 - 06:20 AM.

 Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.

 
New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.
 
Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.
 
Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.
 
new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.
 
Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because  they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are.. 


#28 barry luxton

barry luxton

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,443 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:rochester
  • Interests:Boat fishing and more boat fishing. Some times i have to go to work so it does interfere with my boat fishing, but not much.

Posted 16 September 2016 - 07:58 PM

who remembers this.....................................they also supported and campaigned that everyone in the u k needs to be on a water meter as their environmental expert martin salter, ex labour m p was photographed in the bed of a dry chalk stream, what happened next was the flooding in the Somerset levels and they then campaigned for dredging to be banned as useless. I kid you not.


 Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.

 
New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.
 
Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.
 
Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.
 
new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.
 
Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because  they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are.. 


#29 Norm B

Norm B

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,247 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hampshire UK
  • Interests:Sea Angling, Conservation and shooting.

Posted 17 September 2016 - 09:37 AM

who remembers this.....................................they also supported and campaigned that everyone in the u k needs to be on a water meter as their environmental expert martin salter, ex labour m p was photographed in the bed of a dry chalk stream, what happened next was the flooding in the Somerset levels and they then campaigned for dredging to be banned as useless. I kid you not.

:hammer: I remember it well. Wasn't it a chalk stream that used to hold trout, the fluff chuckers in the AT must have taken it to their hearts and been suicidal. What wasn't revealed at the time, if I remember rightly, was that the cause of the dry streams was, his government, Labour, were letting the water companies exceed the agreed maximum take from rivers sooner than apply water restrictions and increase investment in reservoirs and underground storage facilities. Never let the truth get in the way of a good story, or a political point.  :clap3: