Not so newsworthy !

[Andrew]

Or not, ? Strange how its not splashed all over the rags and TV stations ! ! ! !

 

George Osborne's brother admits having sex with vulnerable patient in his care

George Osborne’s brother is back before the General Medical Council after he admitted having sex with a vulnerable patient who had been under his care, a disciplinary panel has heard.

Dr Adam Osborne, who is currently suspended by the GMC, admitted that he had engaged in an “inappropriate” emotional and sexual relationship with the woman, despite being her private psychiatrist. The woman, referred to as Patient A, had been under Osborne’s care between February 2011 and late 2014 and had a history of mental ill health.

 

 

Report HERE

[Chris Plumb]

Was in today's Metro.....on page 19!

 

C.

[Sportsman]

Does this in some way reflect badly on the Chancellor?

Would you have heard a word about it if he was not the Chancellors brother?

[Andrew]

Was in today's Metro.....on page 19!

 

C.

- he was also suspended in 2010 for writing fraudulent prescriptions !!!!!

[gozzer]

Does this in some way reflect badly on the Chancellor?

Would you have heard a word about it if he was not the Chancellors brother?

 

It's about as newsworthy as Milibands father "hating Britain", but that got more than a few columns of newspaper print.

 

John

[gozzer]

What the hell just happened? My last post appeared as a load of gobbledygook, but its cleared up now.

 

John.

Edited February 9, 2016 by gozzer

[gozzer]

My posts appear as a load of gobble de gook, but then clears up, strange.

 

John.

[corydoras]

Happened to me the other day when I posted the Aussie trucker joke too.

 

And when I posted this. Looks to me like a problem with file permissions or a .conf file

Edited February 10, 2016 by corydoras

[Vagabond]

Or not, ? Strange how its not splashed all over the rags and TV stations ! ! ! !

Perhaps Osborne gave them Cain's response (Gen 4: 9)

 

 

I agree with Sportsman on this. Newshounds will keep digging, looking for dirt, and don't care if said dirt is relevant or not.

 

...and yes, I get the gobbledygook also upon submitting - lots of repeated warnings about "headers" I am not authorised to change.

Edited February 10, 2016 by Vagabond

[corydoras]

Perhaps Osborne gave them Cain's response (Gen 4: 9)

 

 

I agree with Sportsman on this. Newshounds will keep digging, looking for dirt, and don't care if said dirt is relevant or not.

 

...and yes, I get the gobbledygook also upon submitting - lots of repeated warnings about "headers" I am not authorised to change.

 

It's a kind of argumentum ad hominem.