Angling Trust decides it cannot support data collection for recreational catches
Posted 29 February 2016 - 12:00 AM
Click here to view the full article. Please reply below to add your comments, if any.
Posted 29 February 2016 - 03:07 PM
Really, more Angling miss representation at it's worst. TAT was involved with the cefas 2012 angling project. Where they stated before hand that they would go to the meetings and report back to the rsa. they wouldn't collect data. Mitchell and one other attended 6 meetings, they came back and not one word was uttered to the rsa. none, ziltch nada.
Worst than that TAT dragged the rsa into the failed cfp. WITHOUT CONSULTATION It was both salter and the ceo who went up to parliament taking rubbish rsa stats with them, screaming that the bass stock was about to fall off a cliff. It was TAT and their chums in the socialist euro nightmare club who provided dodgy details to the mp's and Europe who came back with legislation banning anglers from taking bass and bag limits. The very first time anglers are in the firing line with the e u management, the proposal is to all but close down the bass charter boat industry. Thanks but no thanks TAT you have caused enough damage..
Not liking what the e u had come up with because of the crap numbers they went screaming back up to their chums in parliament screaming how unfair it all is.
This campaigns geezer Mitchell on TAT appears to be the worst rsa rep in the u k apart from salter who scores own goals. Every single time TAT represents the rsa, more restrictions are applied.
Yet here they are taking no responsibility for their actions and appear to be blaming every one else.
Why don't TAT walk away from representing rsa because they don't have anyone who is any good at it. Don't tell me they can't because it might affect their funding's.
Edited by barry luxton, 29 February 2016 - 03:08 PM.
Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.
New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.
Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.
Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.
Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.
Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.
Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.
new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.
Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..