Jump to content

George Osbourne

Andrew

By Andrew
in Non-Fishing Chat

 Share

Recommended Posts

Andrew Member

Andrew

Posted
Posted

MAY HAVE BROKEN THE RULES

 

He should not be allowed to take on a newspaper editors job whilst still serving as an MP.

 

Not bad if you can get it eh Mr Osbourne, has declared a salary of £650,000 a year for working just four days a month at BlackRock, the world’s biggest fund management firm, as well as almost £800,000 for speeches to financiers.

 

 

"La conclusión es que los insultos sólo perjudican cuando vienen de alguien que respeto". e5006689.gif

“Vescere bracis meis”

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sportsman Member

Sportsman

Posted
Posted

Yep, Shouldn't be allowed.

Fancy someone who has been elected and who is being paid to do a job just going out and getting other jobs at the same time.What sort of politician would do that?

Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be.

 

 

Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity

 

 

 

http://www.safetypublishing.co.uk/
http://www.safetypublishing.ie/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gozzer Member

gozzer

Posted
Posted

Yep, Shouldn't be allowed.

Fancy someone who has been elected and who is being paid to do a job just going out and getting other jobs at the same time.What sort of politician would do that?

 

Sarcasm noted, and if it was shelf stacking in Asda, no problem.

 

With media bias already influencing much of the public, do you think it right that a serving MP should be in charge of a newspaper Dave?

 

John.

  • Like 1

Angling is more than just catching fish, if it wasn't it would just be called 'catching'......... John

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Andrew Member

Andrew

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Hohohoho e5004272.gif As if i give a damn what that individual thinks.. :whistling:

Monetary mecenaries in all walks of life, :bleh:

"La conclusión es que los insultos sólo perjudican cuando vienen de alguien que respeto". e5006689.gif

“Vescere bracis meis”

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sportsman Member

Sportsman

Posted
Posted

Sarcasm noted, and if it was shelf stacking in Asda, no problem.

 

With media bias already influencing much of the public, do you think it right that a serving MP should be in charge of a newspaper Dave?

 

John.

Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be.

 

 

Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity

 

 

 

http://www.safetypublishing.co.uk/
http://www.safetypublishing.ie/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sportsman Member

Sportsman

Posted
Posted

No, I don't, and I don't think it is right that a serving MEP should be spending his time (and our money) running a political party, trying to get elected to a different parliament, appearing on his own radio show and touting his ar5e trying to get a job with the other great lying conman Trump.

Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be.

 

 

Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity

 

 

 

http://www.safetypublishing.co.uk/
http://www.safetypublishing.ie/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted (edited)

 

Sportsman, on 18 Mar 2017 - 23:52, said:

No, I don't, and I don't think it is right that a serving MEP should be spending his time (and our money) running a political party, trying to get elected to a different parliament, appearing on his own radio show and touting his ar5e trying to get a job with the other great lying conman Trump.

 

 

 

 

:bleh::bleh::bleh::bleh:

 

ha ha ha ha, some cheating scum bag released a couple of pages of personal, private information showing trump personally contributing to the usa coffers, they should be locked up for countermanding your pathetic comment.

 

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/03/14/520205373/trump-paid-about-38-million-in-federal-taxes-in-2005-leaked-returns-say

 

 

note you fail to mention this sleaze bag within your condemnation of the nose baggers, farage is a lightweight in comparison:

 

http://www.politico.eu/article/meps-can-have-second-jobs-guy-verhofstadt-belgium-ngo/

Edited by barry luxton

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sportsman Member

Sportsman

Posted
Posted (edited)

A tax return from 12 years ago? Is that it? The best that you can do?

How much tax do you think he might have paid in the last 12 years? Why do you think he is the only presidential candidate /President who has not released his tax returns? Are you really that gullible?

Then we have the typical Luxton swerve by producing someone that has a worse record than farage. What has that got to do with anything?

Just because someone else is a lying thief it doesn't mean that Farage is not a lying thief. He is.

So is Trump. Are you really the only person that can't see that? Even his own party are saying it.

You really should learn to do a little research rather than just picking on headlines without understanding what lies behind them.

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/trumpwatch-trump-watch_uk_58cd0e23e4b00705db4fd88e?utm_hp_ref=uk

Edited by Sportsman

Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be.

 

 

Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity

 

 

 

http://www.safetypublishing.co.uk/
http://www.safetypublishing.ie/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted (edited)

 

Sportsman, on 19 Mar 2017 - 08:12, said:

A tax return from 12 years ago? Is that it? The best that you can do?

How much tax do you think he might have paid in the last 12 years? Why do you think he is the only presidential candidate /President who has not released his tax returns? Are you really that gullible?

Then we have the typical Luxton swerve by producing someone that has a worse record than farage. What has that got to do with anything?

Just because someone else is a lying thief it doesn't mean that Farage is not a lying thief. He is.

So is Trump. Are you really the only person that can't see that? Even his own party are saying it.

You really should learn to do a little research rather than just picking on headlines without understanding what lies behind them.

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/trumpwatch-trump-watch_uk_58cd0e23e4b00705db4fd88e?utm_hp_ref=uk

 

 

 

you really are a hateful sad sack aren't you, got anything else that adds to your misery that you would like to share.

 

I have clearly demonstrated a few posts ago the chances of trump being impeached and you come out with nothing shiet as usual, pages of the shiet, is that the best you have, pathetic I recon.

Edited by barry luxton

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.

  I accept