Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Line Diameter - What for These Days?


  • Please log in to reply
21 replies to this topic

#1 Martin56

Martin56

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 465 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Wakefield
  • Interests:Fishing, Horse Racing, Guitar.

Posted 09 April 2017 - 01:45 AM

I hate line being expressed only by diameter in general discussions.

Surely this was all started with Line Manufacturers "Bragging Rights" as to which one could make the smallest diameter to b.s ratio as a "Selling Point"

 

I just need to know what b.s. is on my reels & hook lengths - That's All - I can compare the dia's in the shop.

Give me just the old money, b.s. all day long. All today's line (The top brands anyway) are pretty much of a (super thin) muchness re Dia/b.s.

I remember line in the 60's - 6 Lb was like Clothesline!!

Today's 6 Lb line is more like the old 3.


Edited by Martin56, 09 April 2017 - 02:23 AM.

Fishin' - "Best Fun Ya' can 'ave wi' Ya' Clothes On"!!


#2 chesters1

chesters1

    AN Resident Contrarian

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 33,630 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:farnham surrey
  • Interests:fishing,fossils,researching intrepid reels and general being naughty

Posted 09 April 2017 - 04:57 AM

I just use the brown stuff i bought IN the 70's lol
Theres a mystery hanging in a tree down the pond ,a weighted feeder with another large weight attached hanging out of reach for over ten years in a tree ,perhaps sunlight doesnt effect line as much as the makers want you to think.
Every day as we go past and see it the pair of us (me the fat guy and him the 85 year old) wonder if it will be there long after weve gone
Modern line doesnt seem to be as stretchy as the old stuff so its thinner but theres little give in it so seems to snap easier
I think if you use line right through to the hook it matters how thin it is but not if you use a hook lenght
Perhaps being thin and less twangy it cuts through rings quicker or perhaps casts easier who knows i havnt bought any for decades ,if it doesnt snap when i tug hard it its fine with me
I have miles of the stuff from magazines in a box along with my bulk spools of brown stuff

Edited by chesters1, 09 April 2017 - 05:05 AM.

Believe NOTHING anyones says or writes unless you witness  it yourself and even then your eyes can deceive you

 

There is only one opinion i listen to ,its mine and its ALWAYS right even when its wrong

 

Its far easier to curse the darkness than light one candle

 

Whitby scallops caught by scottish boats best that money can buy,the nearer the shore they're dredged the better they taste


#3 RUDD

RUDD

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,384 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Nr Felixstowe and Ipswich Suffolk
  • Interests:ALL FISHING, THE NET, ITFC, Cycling, The family

Posted 09 April 2017 - 08:00 AM

Line diameters are just unregulated lies.
RUDD

Different floats for different folks!

#4 lutra

lutra

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,251 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:lancashire
  • Interests:fishing

Posted 09 April 2017 - 12:46 PM

Line diameters are just unregulated lies.

 

And b.s. stands for bull s........

 

It's all just a bad guide at best and you just have to fine one that gives you the best results you want.


A tiger does not lose sleep over the opinion of sheep

#5 Phone

Phone

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 9,041 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:American West - USA

Posted 09 April 2017 - 02:51 PM

All,

 

And fish don't care.

 

Phone



#6 BoldBear

BoldBear

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,210 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Hertfordshire
  • Interests:Fishing, Golf and collecting Fishing Tackle and books.

Posted 09 April 2017 - 03:01 PM

Most of the line manufacturers print the breaking strain on the spool as well as the diameter but if only one specification was printed on the spool I would rather it be the breaking strain and like Martin said; reading an article where lines are only expressed in diameters can be a little disconcerting.

There's a lot more things to worry about in a line than its diameter; like abrasion resistance, shock resistance, amount of stretch, visibility in water, suppleness, memory etc.

Keith

Edited by BoldBear, 09 April 2017 - 04:31 PM.

Happiness is Fish shaped (it used to be woman shaped but the wife is getting on a bit now)

#7 Tigger

Tigger

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,030 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Outer Hebrides

Posted 09 April 2017 - 04:17 PM

I go off breaking strain rather than diameter. Diameters to breaking strains varies so greatly that i'd be lost if I had to go off  the diameter alone....nice to see the diameter on the spool as well as the breaking strain though.



#8 John S

John S

    Moderator

  • Super Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,719 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Yorkshire - God's Own County!
  • Interests:Eating cage birds and missing out commas.

Posted 09 April 2017 - 05:31 PM

Breaking strain for me too, and as with Keith above, reading an article where they only give line diameters tells me next to nothing. Could be 4lb BS, could be 8lb :unsure:


John S

Quanti Canicula Ille In Fenestra

 

Species caught in 2017 Common Ash, Hawthorn, Hazel, Scots Pine, White Willow.

Species caught in 2016: Alder, Blackthorn, Common Ash, Crab Apple, Left Earlobe, Pedunculate Oak,  Rock Whitebeam, Scots Pine, Smooth-leaved Elm, Swan, Wayfaring tree.

Species caught in 2015: Ash, Bird Cherry, Black-Headed Gull, Common Hazel, Common Whitebeam, Elder, Field Maple, Gorse, Puma, Sessile Oak, White Willow.

Species caught in 2014: Big Angry Man's Ear, Blackthorn, Common Ash, Common Whitebeam, Downy Birch, European Beech, European Holly, Hawthorn, Hazel, Scots Pine, Wych Elm.
Species caught in 2013: Beech, Elder, Hawthorn, Oak, Right Earlobe, Scots Pine.

Species caught in 2012: Ash, Aspen, Beech, Big Nasty Stinging Nettle, Birch, Copper Beech, Grey Willow, Holly, Hazel, Oak, Wasp Nest (that was a really bad day), White Poplar.
Species caught in 2011: Blackthorn, Crab Apple, Elder, Fir, Hawthorn, Horse Chestnut, Oak, Passing Dog, Rowan, Sycamore, Willow.
Species caught in 2010: Ash, Beech, Birch, Elder, Elm, Gorse, Mullberry, Oak, Poplar, Rowan, Sloe, Willow, Yew.



Eyes4sml.jpg


#9 ayjay

ayjay

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,916 posts
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Interests:Knife licking: birdwatching : :playing with mud and fire: beer.

Posted 09 April 2017 - 06:05 PM

Line diameter is a match-fishing paranoia is it not?



#10 Tigger

Tigger

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,030 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Outer Hebrides

Posted 09 April 2017 - 06:45 PM

I've caught most of my larger specimens on quite heavy line compared to a lot of people who actually target some of them. I do think a light B/S and low diameter line is often a plus if your targeting finicky fish and so there are times when it'll catch much more fish than my much cruder lines and fishing styles.