30 Degrees!

[Huge_Vitae]

Where we live now

https://www.google.co.uk/#q=weather+mojacar

 

Where we are moving to next month

ttps://www.google.co.uk/#q=weather+thiviers

 

The idea was to escape the heat

Never mind the blinking weather sporty, just listening to the box about Macron's party which apparently didn't exist two years ago, and I am thinking, ' why can't we have a new party here,' not before time I think.

 

On the negative side I see a US warship has been in collision with a Jap. Ship, always sad to read of loss of life before their time, bloody Teresa May again, Coastguard cuts!

 

EDIT: Who mentioned the weather?

Edited June 18, 2017 by Huge_Vitae

[Sportsman]

It seems that we can look forward to Strong and Stable leadership.

In which direction remains to be seen,

[corydoras]

Never mind the blinking weather sporty, just listening to the box about Macron's party which apparently didn't exist two years ago, and I am thinking, ' why can't we have a new party here,' not before time I think.

 

On the negative side I see a US warship has been in collision with a Jap. Ship, always sad to read of loss of life before their time, bloody Teresa May again, Coastguard cuts!

 

EDIT: Who mentioned the weather?

We "don't have the room" is the default reason we can't have things Europe does.

[Sportsman]

Right time. Right place.

Most new parties are stated by extremists of one persuasion or the other. They are usually the only ones with the passion

Macron was unusual because he was a centrist, willing to look at both sides of the argument.

France had just come out of Hollandes socialist government, the most unpopular in history, we are led to believe and was not ready for the FN with its overtones of antisemitism and racism, real or believed, so.......

[Huge_Vitae]

We "don't have the room" is the default reason we can't have things Europe does.

 

Without getting into the rather complex, which is the World's oldest Democracy debate, I think the EU or Europe is the last thing we should be hankering behind or seeking guidance.

 

Right time. Right place.

Most new parties are stated by extremists of one persuasion or the other. They are usually the only ones with the passion

Macron was unusual because he was a centrist, willing to look at both sides of the argument.

France had just come out of Hollandes socialist government, the most unpopular in history, we are led to believe and was not ready for the FN with its overtones of antisemitism and racism, real or believed, so.......

And that is different here is it Sporty, I for one have had a gut full of the whole bloody lot of them in this Country(ies) and feel no different than the points you raise.

 

I know the WWOS was criticised for her lack of experiance as she is childless but it seems to me that if she had five kids they would just be working somewhere in the system.

 

Time for change, ha ha, that's a laugh, time for more as usual.

Edited June 19, 2017 by Huge_Vitae

[chesters1]

Right time. Right place.

Most new parties are stated by extremists of one persuasion or the other. They are usually the only ones with the passion

Macron was unusual because he was a centrist, willing to look at both sides of the argument.

France had just come out of Hollandes socialist government, the most unpopular in history, we are led to believe and was not ready for the FN with its overtones of antisemitism and racism, real or believed, so.......

Not sure UKIP was/ is extremist unless your version of extremism is vastly different to mine ,sure it has extremist within them all groups over two will have .

Perhaps rather than extremism people group together to try and break the momentum of the same old same old with people unwilling to rock the boat because it may lead to them on the dole rather than the trough of plenty the usual parties enjoy

Our lot of trough feeders have realised they cannot voice their real opinions because there are lots of votes to be cast by people they may not want to upset ,those in france hope to get votes BY voicing their opinion but they have learnt it usually backfires because not everyone is effected by those they despise ,one day ofcourse once the majority are effected they may win but lose the vote of the people they despise as they multiply.

Labour i bet hope if they get enough greatful immigrants fed and watered and given uk membership they will vote for labour hense corbyn is laid back in that area ,you need to see the future you know!

Edited June 19, 2017 by chesters1

[corydoras]

Never mind the blinking weather sporty, just listening to the box about Macron's party which apparently didn't exist two years ago, and I am thinking, ' why can't we have a new party here,' not before time I think.

 

On the negative side I see a US warship has been in collision with a Jap. Ship, always sad to read of loss of life before their time, bloody Teresa May again, Coastguard cuts!

 

EDIT: Who mentioned the weather?

 

 

 

Without getting into the rather complex, which is the World's oldest Democracy debate, I think the EU or Europe is the last thing we should be hankering behind or seeking guidance.

 

And that is different here is it Sporty, I for one have had a gut full of the whole bloody lot of them in this Country(ies) and feel no different than the points you raise.

 

I know the WWOS was criticised for her lack of experiance as she is childless but it seems to me that if she had five kids they would just be working somewhere in the system.

 

Time for change, ha ha, that's a laugh, time for more as usual.

So what was the point of your Macron post?

[Huge_Vitae]

 

 

So what was the point of your Macron post?

The point is, why can't we have a new Political Party to get rid of the flotsam of unelectable people that we have now.

 

I see a few people that I like and would support, the problem is they are opposite 'sides' of Politics and for that reason alone will not work together.

 

As an example, not for everybody I know, I happen to 'like' Hilary Benn for Labour and Andrea Leadsome for Tory and then there is the LibDems...... I'll come back to that later.

 

I understand that Macron was guilty by association with a Socialist Govt but indications are that he is prepared to set that aside.

[chesters1]

You dont want parties they follow the party line ,you want individuals that can form temporary alliances to get laws passed that reflect their employers (the voter) not the party .

Trouble is the oppostion oppose things that maybe beneficial but made by the opponent ,no oponent no opposition for the sake of opposing just because they can.

Even cross party select committees are not a set of equals the members are selected by parties therefor the party line still has precedence over anything

 

I dont like any of them ,any one wishing to be elected should by default never be elected ,and what idiot would elect a bunch of people to punish them ?

 

The idea of democracy is just a veneer most of the work done to run the place is by unelected bureaucrats who wield huge power

Edited June 19, 2017 by chesters1

[corydoras]

The point is, why can't we have a new Political Party to get rid of the flotsam of unelectable people that we have now.

 

I see a few people that I like and would support, the problem is they are opposite 'sides' of Politics and for that reason alone will not work together.

 

As an example, not for everybody I know, I happen to 'like' Hilary Benn for Labour and Andrea Leadsome for Tory and then there is the LibDems...... I'll come back to that later.

 

I understand that Macron was guilty by association with a Socialist Govt but indications are that he is prepared to set that aside.

I don't know Huge. We should all be hanging our heads in shame.Out of the 46,000,000 of us who are eligible to vote the best we have to offer is May or Corbyn. It's a bloody joke and the joke is on us

Edited June 19, 2017 by corydoras