routers
#1
Posted 22 July 2012 - 07:17 AM
The one i have with aol is at least 5-7 years old. The desktop is used through bt's phone line and we have the portable wireless one as well. All is very well apart from video streaming that can chug along sometimes.
Can an uptodate router improve the speed at which we recieve info? We have looked at download speeds etc and these are within aol's perameters as acceptable.
Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in.
shame on the trust for being party to dragging the rsa into the failed cfp, because they can sniff funding.
Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.
Consumer of bass.
Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.
Angling sanitation trust delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.
Kent & Essex Sea Anglers, block alternative opinion on their face book page, shame full.
#2
Posted 22 July 2012 - 11:41 AM
#3
Posted 22 July 2012 - 05:49 PM
Some allow for better sharing of multiple connections and throttling etc, but even they can only work within the limit of your phone line speed.
http://speedtester.bt.com/
Run this test on your non wireless system and make a note of the connection speed and your ip profile.
http://www.anglersne...e-t4437375.html
Check my post here as well about testing your connections via the main bt input.
If things are somewhat slow then you might also consider one of these:
http://www.amazon.co...a...9229&sr=8-1
I've seen them add anywhere between .5 and 1.5 meg to a connection speed.
Finally you need to run speed checks regularly for a week or so to see if your phone line is staying constant or dropping speed etc at certain times.
#4
Posted 23 July 2012 - 10:37 AM
the new faceplate did nothing for my speed as it was only a two wire connection anyway ,mine speed is 1.1 mb BT could supply .4mb and still call it broadbandA router will only connect as fast as the local exchange will allow your line to. Regardless of how new it is or how good it's software is.
Some allow for better sharing of multiple connections and throttling etc, but even they can only work within the limit of your phone line speed.
http://speedtester.bt.com/
Run this test on your non wireless system and make a note of the connection speed and your ip profile.
http://www.anglersne...e-t4437375.html
Check my post here as well about testing your connections via the main bt input.
If things are somewhat slow then you might also consider one of these:
http://www.amazon.co...a...9229&sr=8-1
I've seen them add anywhere between .5 and 1.5 meg to a connection speed.
Finally you need to run speed checks regularly for a week or so to see if your phone line is staying constant or dropping speed etc at certain times.
#5
Posted 23 July 2012 - 11:50 AM
the whole infrastructure is a joke to be honest!the new faceplate did nothing for my speed as it was only a two wire connection anyway ,mine speed is 1.1 mb BT could supply .4mb and still call it broadband
#6
Posted 23 July 2012 - 03:36 PM
Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in.
shame on the trust for being party to dragging the rsa into the failed cfp, because they can sniff funding.
Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.
Consumer of bass.
Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.
Angling sanitation trust delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.
Kent & Essex Sea Anglers, block alternative opinion on their face book page, shame full.
#7
Posted 23 July 2012 - 03:42 PM
What connection speeds is ADSLSpeedTest telling you you are getting?
#8
Posted 23 July 2012 - 05:46 PM
If your wired and wireless clients are experiencing the same delays, upgrading your router probably won't make any difference.
What connection speeds is ADSLSpeedTest telling you you are getting?
Hello Steve,
Down .914 mb/s
and up .352 mb/s and it appears to be a good average over a period of time.
And we are not too far from our exchange believe it or not.
This is with aol, honest we have not had any major issues with them ever apart from low video streaming.
B t are offering a super fast service in our area, bit a a sceptic when it comes to what they say and what we receive.
Edited by barry luxton, 23 July 2012 - 05:47 PM.
Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in.
shame on the trust for being party to dragging the rsa into the failed cfp, because they can sniff funding.
Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.
Consumer of bass.
Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.
Angling sanitation trust delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.
Kent & Essex Sea Anglers, block alternative opinion on their face book page, shame full.
#9
Posted 23 July 2012 - 08:55 PM
What ip profile does the bt speed tester tell you your line is set at?
What's your local exchange as well? I'll check it's adsl features
#10
Posted 24 July 2012 - 12:24 AM
thanks ,bear with us, off on a boat for a couple of days, sorry.914 is atrocious speed!
What ip profile does the bt speed tester tell you your line is set at?
What's your local exchange as well? I'll check it's adsl features
Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in.
shame on the trust for being party to dragging the rsa into the failed cfp, because they can sniff funding.
Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.
Consumer of bass.
Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.
Angling sanitation trust delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.
Kent & Essex Sea Anglers, block alternative opinion on their face book page, shame full.














