Would the pike record not be one? I may be wrong but I thought only a limited few got to fish that water for pike.I believe the same can be said of Chew where although I believe anybody can apply to fish there for pike only a very few actually get the chance to fish it.Living in the Channel Islands I do very little in the way of coarse fishing but I do follow the coarse specimen scene with some interest,therefore I may have my facts wrong so I hold my hands up if I have.I started this thread because the British records lists is an interesting topic worthy of discussion I believe.Growing up as a young angler the thought of actually catching a British record was something special.Last year I caught a smoothound which may of just beaten the current british record.It was heavily in pups and as smoothound can only be truly identified by a marine biologist it would of meant killing the fish to claim the record.The fact is there have already been bigger hounds caught and released so it would of been killing the fish to claim a record even though its not the biggest hound that's been caught which to me seems somewhat pointless.I should probably point out at this point I have infact killed a fish to claim a british record in the past so I have been both sides of this.I remember the situation with the Rainbow trout being grown to huge weights then released for somebody to catch a new record within a day or so.The brfc then set up the natural and reared records to counter this.My point is really I want to see the british record list held up as the pinacal of each species but that can only be so if it represents the biggest species caught.Not sure what the answer or even if there is one.How many of you honestly would kill a record smoothound or skate or even Bass to claim a british record? I don't necessarily agree with the ego remarks,to my mind your either a pleasure,match or specimen angler and if your a specimen angler you get you enjoyment from targeting and catching big fish,nothing wrong with that.