-
Posts
17475 -
Joined
-
Days Won
70
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Posts posted by corydoras
-
-
1 hour ago, Huge_Vitae said:
Do you really believe that this country is some kind of democracy? Who told you that and why do you believe them? Since when has two cheecks of the same ass been a choice?
-
So please explain to me why you can be bothered getting out of your bed on an Election Day to vote for any of them?
Apart from same arse different cheek what does your vote accomplish? -
On 1/19/2022 at 8:45 PM, Martin56 said:
It took a week to make Gene Pitney's coffin out of Oak - but "Only 24 Hours from Balsa".
That is pretty wooden.
-
-
Meat Loaf has had his chips.
-
17 hours ago, Ken L said:
He had it all and he blew it.
Wankstains voted for a liar.
-
-
-
I was going to suggest bleach, then I realised the topic was Crop Marks
- 1
-
-
On 12/4/2021 at 11:52 AM, Tigger said:
What they are doing it Greece to over 60's (which is the tip of the ice berg) is outrageous, to make the vaccine mandatory is imo totalitarian!
We must have had an authoritarian government in 1853. Mind you George Hamilton-Gordon was a Tory.
-
On 11/27/2021 at 8:24 AM, Ken L said:
More fear, and coincidentally, just in time to push Christmas sales away from high streets and towards Bezos and his club of billionaires.
Oh, and completely by coincidence, it arrives, just as suspicion about the nature and safety of the "vaccine" breaks through from "conspiracy theory" into the mainstream, and difficult questions like "Why are so many athletes dropping dead?" and "Why are the elders of Aboriginal tribes having videos where they say they are being hunted down and force vaccinated, removed from YouTube?" are being asked.
Only nut jobs ask questions like that. I hope we get an outbreak or a proper virus like Marburg or Lassa Fever. That would whittle away some of the science deniers.
-
7 hours ago, Ken L said:
Not when they're coming from pond life...
Don't tempt me.
-
11 hours ago, Ken L said:
I've not followed the story, and with no TV, it hasn't been rammed down my throat.
I gather that first one, and now two South Asian players, are claiming they were called racist names over the course of a decade, and that the "offence archaeologists" are now going through the social media histories of everyone at the club looking for evidence of nasty racist terms in their historical tweets and posts - although I doubt that said South Asian players will be included in the exercise.
Sorry to be dismissive, but while targetting people based on their ethnic origin is clearly wrong if it's done with malice, if one guy is doing it, it does not bring shame on an entire club, organisation or county, it just means that he is a prize bellend.
Call me a cynic, but I suspect that this is more about the ideologically motivated left tearing down cultural institutions than it is about hurty words.
Says the guy who gets all upset at hurty words.
-
If being an MP is just a part time job then maybe they should get paid a tenner an hour and have to keep time sheets like the rest of us poor mortals. I'd suggest performance related pay but then they would need to pay us.
-
9 hours ago, Ken L said:
Fiona Onasanya, Keith Vaz, Nazir Ahmed..
The list of dodgy MPs is long.
They should all be sacked, but you can't sack an MP because the usual dimwits will vote for them again.
-
22 hours ago, Huge_Vitae said:
Yes but equally we all should remember that MP’s are subject to violence, threats of violence, stalking and harassment almost on a daily basis.
They are, after all representatives of the population and as such should be made up of a representative, proportionate cross section of the population.
A percentage of the population steal, murder, thieve, defraud and generally treat others as a commodity. It should be accepted that a percentage of representatives will do the same.
Cash for questions (although in this case there is slightly more to it than being reported, hence Owen Paterson’s recent actions) cash for honours and possibly cash for indecent images is nothing new.
There is certainly nothing new in the fact that the (employer’s) voters have limited powers to remove the offender, it should not be up to other MP’s to determine the fate of a member who breaches the trust of the electorate.
If you get away from the media and political crap you might see that there is a case to say that Paterson although in breach of the rules, MIGHT have been justified in doing so and in any case a right to appeal should exist, certainly in a bipartisan system.
Read this link, not in the news much…
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leicestershire-58913968
and tell me that the Paterson case is worse.
Cue the usual apologists supporting these trouser stains
-
1 hour ago, Ken L said:
"A Parliament composed entirely of full-time professional politicians would not serve the best interests of democracy. The House needs if possible to contain Members with a wide range of current experience which can contribute to its expertise."
- Lord Nolan: Chairman of the Committee on Standards in Public Life.
I don't believe Lord Nolan, who elected him to speak for us?
Deflect, deflect, deflect. -
They should not be permitted "outside interests". They have a job.
-
Cue the usual apologists supporting these trouser stains.
-
- 1
- 2
-
There is NOTHING to gain from hydrogen.
-
I'll believe it when I see it. The current gas mains will not hold hydrogen.
-
On 10/21/2021 at 11:56 PM, Martin56 said:
This one is clearly NOT one of these, but one looking to Kill!
How do you know?
- 1
HAVE A LAUGH
in Non-Fishing Chat
Posted
Thhis is what you get when you order a Boris Johnson from wish.com.