Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by Sportsman

  1. Because I like winding tw*ts like you up Too easy
  2. So who do we have in the little gang? First we have the moron who has decided I obviously have no friends based solely on the fact that I occasionally write on a fishing forum. I don'y quite know how to break this to him as he obviously doesn't understand, but so does he Then we have the littke sad thing that cried like a baby and said that he had to leave because I was a bully, for pointing out the truth about his bull**** He only joins in from the sidelines when he feels he has other on his side. If you added both of their IQs together, you would still not reach double figures (By the
  3. Nice little group we have here. I thought the remarks might be malicious, but I was mistaken.
  4. Ken When did the British people say "yeah" to no deal Brexit? It wasn't mentioned in the referendum, in fact Johnson et al were saying that they would retain access to the single market. That they would be stupid NOT to retain access to the single market. Of course, they may have been lying, knowing that there was no way that they could retain access to the single market without meeting other conditions. If they didn't know that then they were obviously incompetent. EU: " Of course you can have access to the single market, but you will have to conform to the same rules as others who enjo
  5. EU intransigence? I understood that access to the single market was possible but would have required the UK to meet certain conditions, which they were not prepared to do. If the EU were to give the UK access to the single market once they have left, without the UK meeting any of the requirements. then any other country in the world can have access to the single market when it suits them. Doesn't sound likely, does it. It is a bit like someone leaving a fishing club to start their own, but damanding access to all of the original clubs water whenever they feel like it, without meting any of t
  6. Ah yes, the dreaded antifar terrorists. From a report on racially or religiously motivated murders published in America. "from 2009 through 2018, right-wing extremists accounted for 73 percent of such killings, according to the ADL, compared with 23 percent for Islamists and 3 percent for left-wing extremists"
  7. Just for balance https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_lNtyG0gUyg BTW, before the usual abuse starts, I am not a socialist or left wing supporter, I am just anti right wing.
  8. Regardless of who becomes Prime Minister, does anyone think that the UK will leave the EU on 31st October? To add to this, my own opinion is that you won't. There is no realistic expectation of a new deal by that date so the only alternative is no deal. If Boris tries to do that he will lose a vote of no confidence. If he prorogues parliament to do it then he will lose a vote of no confidence. Either way, Boris will go down as the shortest lived Prime minister, possibly in history. (I can't be bothered to look it up)
  9. Why would Farage be bothered about who takes charge of the EU? You will be leaving in 3 months, won't you? You can trust Boris I'm sure.
  10. I didn't mention Trump getting reelected. He may well. As for in 3rd year and nothing has happened, that is down to the spineless republicans in Congress. Had a Democratic president done and said a fraction of the things that Trump has, they would be falling over themselves to impeach. American politics has descended into a cheap copy of a 3rd world banana republic. As for the UK doing anything by November, they are busily electing probably the worst candidate in British history who is just stupid enough to drag the UK out to who knows what, after lying continuously to get himself into th
  11. The farce continues https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1W8wSa5JTl0
  12. Sleepwalking into potential disaster https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BrF8bb6b8ig This guy makes sense, as well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GrTcXwTDeb0 So, the UK will have a prime minister who looks like Trump, who sounds like Trump and who lies like Trump. This is the man who will be negotiating the YUGE trade deal with Trump. Heaven help you, and all of us.
  13. Strange, I always see them descibed as Muslim grooming gangs. When I read about muslims I don't remeber ever reading about their country of origen. It is always "The Muslims did this" or "the Muslims did that" Years ago I was mugged by three white football hooligans. I don't remember them being described as Christian muggers at the time.
  14. No-one could disagree with that. I would make the point that the vast majority of these offenders are from the same country, so it isn't predominantly Moslems to blame, although that is what happens. All you hear about is moslem grooming gangs rather that Pakistani grooming gangs.
  15. 9 months. Seems fair. He will be out in a few weeks and then he can pi** off to Trumpland
  16. Way back before Trump was elected, I joked on here about Trump negotiating with Boris if we were not careful, and what a disaster that would be. I thought it was funny at the time.
  17. Ken Yes, I rather thought you might have... Or rather you've had it made up for you by a very effective propaganda machine. And yet, 10 hours ago, you couldn't explain what he had done wrong. I suppose you also think he's a racist of some sort. I read a lot of news. I get my news from a wide range of sources, not just from conspiracy theorists like infowars or Breitbart, or even Fox news. All I know of the case is what I have read, just like you, I have no special knowlege. He has been found guilty of contempt of court, he will be sentenced for the offence. I am happy with that. Had he be
  18. Persecution? Sorry, but I have made up my own mind
  19. No.it's OK. They have a special grownup who explains it all.
  20. My understanding is the charge was contempt of court. Something he should have been aware of as he had prviously been awarded a suspended sentence for it. No mention of being jailed for breach of the peace. I don't really understand why he is so worried about it. It's not exactly the first time, is it? 2005: Jailed for 12 months for assault 2010: Arrested for public order offence 2011: Convicted for football hooliganism 2011: Jailed for breaching bail conditions 2011: Convicted for assault 2011: Jailed for rooftop protest in Switzerland 2013 Jailed for using false passport 20
  21. The Ambassador hasn't been at all undiplomatic. He sent an honest report to his employers, the UK government, as is his job. It is what all Ambassadors do on behalf of countries all over the world. The fault lies with the person who leaked it to the newspapers. Don't you think that the US Ambassador sends similar reports to the US government, even if Trump can't read them, or at least, understand them?
  22. Oh, I do apologise. I didn't realise that it had an actual definition. I thought that it was a general perjorative term for snivelling little tw*ts who couldn't get their own way. I will know better next time and call him more accurate names. Edit Hmm, seems I wasn't too far out anyway. Snowflake (slang) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Snowflake is a 2010s derogatory slang termfor a person, implying that they have an inflated sense of uniqueness, an unwarranted sense of entitlement, or are overly-emotional, easily offended, and unable to deal with opposing opinions.
  23. He wasn't found guilty of filming or reporting, he was found guilty of contempt of court. He was ordered to stop by the court more than once. He decided that the law didn't apply to him. It did. Do I feel any sympathy for him? What do you think? https://twitter.com/i/status/1148340374454374401
  24. Wow, condemning a man to death? I am not responsible for his crimes and I have not found him guilty of anything. The only person responsible is him. I think ALL criminals should face the consequences, regardless of their race, creed or political affiliations. As for articulating his crimes, I am sure that they have been articulated very clearly by professionals in court. Interesting that you claim he couldn't have broken the law because the defendents were found guilty anyway. IMO opinion the breaking of the law is not dependent on the outcome. If someone breaks into your house to steal y
  • Create New...