Jump to content

Article 47


Snatcher

Recommended Posts

stop the rot, easy get the hell out of the eu, something like 43 Million a day it costs Britain to be in the eu.

 

 

Not so easy with so many enjoying a luxury cruise on the gravy boat.

I fish to live and live to fish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 216
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Not so easy with so many enjoying a luxury cruise on the gravy boat.

 

This guy is on a roll at the mo. Have to say though even he has been there ten years so getting him to turn the lights off after every one has left might just be a bit difficult. :D

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/8040168.stm

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Don't care how they word it, they arn't capable of looking after our fishermen, fishstocks, anglers in any event as time has clearly shown.

 

much prefer this option. :)

 

http://www.ukip.org/media/pdf/fishing.pdf

Edited by barry luxton

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Steve these are the words that the majority of commercila fishemen say to me for gods sake dont get a log book or licence because if you you do you will bo doomed and they are right we will be doomed these people burbleing on about anglers need regulating how been fed lies upon lies about anglers and dont know the difference between the tip of a rod to the butt some people in the high and mighty in the fishing industry were lobbying to get us regulated and then when it was mentioned we might end with slice of there quota they started screaming like a rabbid dog as charterboats if we do end up going down that road god forbid because if we all went bust tommorow it wouldnt make a **** of difference to any stock but if we do end up licecened a quota would be better than bag limits bag limits would automaticly create discards in RSA but steve you have to remember the powers that be in brussels have been fed lies about anglers which unfortunaltly have come from powerefull members inside the commercial fishng industry the whole thing is joke and after what has gone on in the last 30 years to hear them complain about anglers is enough to make your blood boil.

 

paul.

 

Hi,

 

Why have you not mentioned the active campaigning and lobbying by RSA reps for EU recognition? Seems to me that angling organisations in the past all but called for article 47 or similar regulation's in their various presentation's to the powers that be.

If the very people who say they represent RSA have made it plain that they wish to be regulated what's all the fuss about?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Why have you not mentioned the active campaigning and lobbying by RSA reps for EU recognition? Seems to me that angling organisations in the past all but called for article 47 or similar regulation's in their various presentation's to the powers that be.

If the very people who say they represent RSA have made it plain that they wish to be regulated what's all the fuss about?

 

 

Welcome. :)

 

The only regulation i would like to see imposed on the rsa from the eu is for the rsa to be excluded from the eu. Might save a heck of a lot of money being wasted. Now that's an incentive. :D

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.