Jump to content

Barbed or Barbless. What's your opinion?


Baronizer

Recommended Posts

Rather than carry out 'thought experiments' as to how different hooks physically behave in different situations, it's far more educational to carry out some real experimenents.

 

Of course, I'm not suggesting hooking live fish, or killing fish for the purpose of experimentation!

 

Chamois leather will demonstrate how much difference barbs make to penetration.

 

Hooking into an orange's peel, and putting on presssure, will demonstrate how barbless slips more easily through soft but reasonably tough material, more easily than barbed.

 

For the seriously inquisitive, fish meant for dinner can be borrowed whilst the cook is out shopping (although that can prove dangerous! "Whose been mucking around with that fish?" "Er, it must have been the cat"!)

 

Experimentation can demolish a lot of cherished theories, and from them we learn facts, not how to copy and repeat other's reasonable sounding but sometimes false opinions.

 

And it keeps you out of mishief when it's raining (though the cook may disagree. "Whose done that to the oranges"!)

 

Tight Lines - leon

 

[ 24. August 2004, 07:29 AM: Message edited by: Leon Roskilly ]

RNLI Shoreline Member

Member of the Angling Trust

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Gentlemen, I am going to differ in opinion here and state that is not barbed or barbless hooks that is the problem, but rather hook SIZE. I have caught 6-8lb Carp using a No8 hook and seen damage to the mouth, caused by that hook. I have caught 6-8lb Carp on a No16 hook and seen the hook usually fall out in the landing net and no marks where MY hook had been.

I believe that the fact of catching a larger fish on a small hook triggers the angler into taking more care when playing it. allowing the fish its head - within reason - and not bullying it at all for fear of the pulling out or straightening of the hook gives the angler the extra challenge to land it and extra pride/satisfaction when he does.

5460c629-1c4a-480e-b4a4-8faa59fff7d.jpg

 

fishing is nature's medical prescription

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BUDGIE:

For Perch I do not like barbless hooks as I have found them to penetrate to deeply.If the hook is back in the throat this can result in damage to vital orgams such as the heart.

...and not just perch. Recently I was asked by a fishery owner to dissect out the pharyngeal teeth of one of his fish, to determine whether or not it was a silver bream.

 

In the course of the dissection, I was reminded of just how close the heart is to the back of the throat in fish - it is just a hook-gape away.

 

There has been much good sense set out in this thread, particularly by Leon and Budgie.

 

Any newcomers to fishing should take careful note that there is no straightforward generalised answer to "barbed or barbless?" Each species of fish, each fishing method requires a different approach - many of those approaches are mentioned in this thread.

 

Baronizer has done us all a favour by re-raising the issue.

 

BTW If you think this thread is acrimonious, you should have heard the debate about that silver bream (for that is what it seemed to be, with two rows of pharyngeal teeth each side).

Those who had caught one-pound-plus fish from this venue cheered, those who had not cried "skimmer" and went home to stick pins in a Vagabond effigy.

 

 

RNLI Governor

 

World species 471 : UK species 105 : English species 95 .

Certhia's world species - 215

Eclectic "husband and wife combined" world species 501

 

"Nothing matters very much, few things matter at all" - Plato

...only things like fresh bait and cold beer...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been playing with various hooks and bits of paper, very thin plastic and chamois leather! I get the impression that a barbless hook makes a round hole where a barbed hook makes a very slightly more oval hole. Infact I get the impression that some barbs cut and leave triangular holes. In practical terms I would have thought a round hole was less likely to tear. If we relate the thin plastic to a fish's lips then I can see the logic of barbless. Then, if we relate chamois to the flesh within a fish's mouth, then perhaps there is an arguement in favour of barbed. I'm still not convinced either way. We can't determine, except perhaps with circle hooks, where the hook is going to penetrate, and I think that that is relevant to the debate.

 

I did think of using the cat for experimentation but it must have been able to read my mind and scarpered!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest allibee

"I do wonder about those who fish hair rigs and boilies for carp with barbless....I wonder just how many fish prick themselves and then shake the hook out without the angler knowing?" Errr loads Den, they get away with it all the time except you'd never see more than some twitching on your bobbin

As for the rest, I can promise you I have it from the horses mouth who sees this day in and day out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

poledark:

Nor me Peter...Allibee says that the "least bit of slack will allow the hook to move back or forward"....Not possible...only the fish or the hooklink can/do move, the hook has to go wherever it is pulled or pushed.

Be mindful of what a weight can do.

 

With full pressure, a weight will be roughly in line with the direction of pull, but allow the line to slacken, the weight will pendulum down below the fish, changing the angle of force against the hook.

 

Tighten up again, reduce pressure, tighten again, that lead weight swinging around is possibly pulling the hook in all directions.

 

TL - leon

RNLI Shoreline Member

Member of the Angling Trust

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wot a debate!

 

i use barbed in most situations,i like to land fish,i beleive that a barbed hook goes in and 9/10 it stays in,the only expetion is my pike and zander fishing,i like others only use semi-barbed trebels with the barb always in the bait not outside it.i completly understand why barbless are better in some circumstances,ie small fish,perch-vital organs etc

AKA RATTY

LondonBikers.Com....Suzuki SV1000S K3 Rider and Predator Crazy Angler!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ratty46:

i completly understand why barbless are better in some circumstances,ie small fish,perch-vital organs etc

Er...... Ratty, it is BARBED Hooks that are recommended to avoid damage to perch. Was that a slip of the keyboard?

 

 

RNLI Governor

 

World species 471 : UK species 105 : English species 95 .

Certhia's world species - 215

Eclectic "husband and wife combined" world species 501

 

"Nothing matters very much, few things matter at all" - Plato

...only things like fresh bait and cold beer...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vagabond - for perch the "barb vs no barb, how to avoid damage", question can also be related to hook size.

 

I submit that if you stay with hooks 6/0 and larger with a crushed barb, you will never cause damage to the vital organs near the perch's throat and with 10/0 and larger, no mouth damage, ever, with either barbed or barbless.

" My choices in life were either to be a piano player in a whore house or a politician. And to tell the truth, there's hardly any difference!" - Harry Truman, 33rd US President

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.