Jump to content

Threat to angling in the USA.


Recommended Posts

Steve,

 

You can't view that thread unless you register. What's it about?

Anglers' Net Shopping Partners - Please Support Your Forum

CLICK HERE for all your Amazon purchases - books, photography equipment, DVD's and more!

CLICK HERE for Go Outdoors. HUGE discounts!

 

FOLLOW ANGLERS' NET ON TWITTER- CLICK HERE - @anglersnet

PLEASE 'LIKE' US ON FACEBOOK - CLICK HERE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steve,

 

You can't view that thread unless you register. What's it about?

 

It's about what could happen here if the cranks who claim to represent anglers are allowed to continue with their crusades.

 

A lot of them have used Amercia as an example of how they think things should be in the world of angling. Which explains a lot.

 

RSA strategy, anyone?

Edited by Steve Coppolo

DRUNK DRIVERS WRECK LIVES.

 

Don't drink and drive.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think many anglers in the US (unless they are staunch Republicans - cue Newt ) take much notice of what is Anti Obama political rhetoric, rather than a fair representation of the facts.

"I gotta go where its warm, I gotta fly to saint somewhere "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Same old crap. The meddlers don't acheive anything, they don't do anything positive, they have nothing in their armory to make things better, ziltch. It's all about restrictions, yet they call it balance. It's rubbish. Don't they have any idea to make something as apposed to taking something away. Lundy is a prime example of restriction, yet where is the positive, there ain't one.

 

The only thing of value in this link was the suggestion of an artificial reef and that is as far as it got. Load of dirge.

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same old crap. The meddlers don't acheive anything, they don't do anything positive, they have nothing in their armory to make things better, ziltch. It's all about restrictions, yet they call it balance. It's rubbish. Don't they have any idea to make something as apposed to taking something away. Lundy is a prime example of restriction, yet where is the positive, there ain't one.

 

The only thing of value in this link was the suggestion of an artificial reef and that is as far as it got. Load of dirge.

 

They love it Barry. The idea of having similar restrictions over here excites the meddlers no end. The infamous MPA "discussion" paper is their equivalant of pornographic literature. It doesn't matter whether anglers are restricted or not, because most meddlers hardly ever fish. To them, every angler restricted increases their chances of catching something when they do venture down to the water. Perverts.

DRUNK DRIVERS WRECK LIVES.

 

Don't drink and drive.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.