Jump to content

How F'ing Angry Does This Make You?


Dave B

Recommended Posts

What makes me just as angry is the restrictions on anglers for example at christchurch harbour on the perceived threat that the stock was being decimated. Even though the powers to be stated that they have evidence to back it up, none has ever been produced for the public domain. Rules based on buster browns i recon. Hope they don't get any holiday makers there this year, thats what they deserve.

 

Weymouth harbour has free unrestricted angling, yet there isn't any shortage there. Last season there was very many shoels of mullet, what makes christchurch any different.

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check this out!

http://www.gofishing.co.uk/Sea-Angler/Sect...ullet-massacre/

 

I honestly think that these idiots need an anchor tying to their legs, then being sent off for a swim in 100 metres!

50p a kilo - to**ers!

 

I totally agree with you m8 they are a bunch of W***ers with no respect for anything & to think they got 50p kg makes me want to tie the anchor on them personally SICKENING!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the picture on the quay, I would say the fish were around a kilo apiece or perhape a bit more..

 

So 20,000 at 50p per kilo means someone has pocketed at least £10,000 - so although you might call them short-sighted idiots, for this month at least they are short-sighted rich idiots.

 

Netting shoals of spawning mullet has been happening for many years, so one might marvel that there are any mullet left in the sea, but nevertheless there they are each year.

 

Piles of fish like that tend to put into perspective the howls of self-righteous rage when an RSA takes a single mullet home for the pot <_<<_<

 

 

RNLI Governor

 

World species 471 : UK species 105 : English species 95 .

Certhia's world species - 215

Eclectic "husband and wife combined" world species 501

 

"Nothing matters very much, few things matter at all" - Plato

...only things like fresh bait and cold beer...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the picture on the quay, I would say the fish were around a kilo apiece or perhape a bit more..

 

So 20,000 at 50p per kilo means someone has pocketed at least £10,000 - so although you might call them short-sighted idiots, for this month at least they are short-sighted rich idiots.

 

Netting shoals of spawning mullet has been happening for many years, so one might marvel that there are any mullet left in the sea, but nevertheless there they are each year.

 

Piles of fish like that tend to put into perspective the howls of self-righteous rage when an RSA takes a single mullet home for the pot <_<<_<

 

Sensible post, Vagabond. Also, as the 50p per Kilo seems to have caused some annoyance, I think people would be surprised at just how little other species are worth commercially.

DRUNK DRIVERS WRECK LIVES.

 

Don't drink and drive.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I recall reports of immigrants netting mullet in harbours ( probably because that would be the practice where they came from ) and being arrested or warned off.

 

This doesn't exactly present a shining example of behaviour.

 

I was angry a few years back when working away in ilfracombe, there were boxes and boxes of dogfish, all so skinny you wouldn't have even considered taking one for the table. I even got my tape out, they were only just legal.

 

A few enquiries later, i found out they were for whelk pot bait. Why take juvenile fish out of the ecosystem to catch snails when a sheeps head from the butchers would do the same job ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What makes me just as angry is the restrictions on anglers for example at christchurch harbour on the perceived threat that the stock was being decimated. Even though the powers to be stated that they have evidence to back it up, none has ever been produced for the public domain. Rules based on buster browns i recon. Hope they don't get any holiday makers there this year, thats what they deserve.

 

Weymouth harbour has free unrestricted angling, yet there isn't any shortage there. Last season there was very many shoels of mullet, what makes christchurch any different.

Hi Barry Pulled a bit of political weight for you. It is sometimes useful being a councillor. Got this reply from Christcurch Hope it helps Cheers

Ivan Bell

Contents Manager

www.wildcard-whitby.com

Hi Ivan

Salmon apart, the main targeted beneficiary of our policy is sea trout.

Our problem is not casual anglers who we want to encourage as much as possible but the rogue anglers who use illegal methods and drift nets to catch large amounts of fish. We are carrying out extensive anti poaching patrols for 2 years(this is our second year) aimed solely at these one or two individuals. Regretably because we want to ensure a consistent approach, everyone has got caught up with this change but as indicated earlier we want to make this change only for a limited period bearing in mind we will look sympathetically at requests from some anglers at taking "one for the pot"

Yours sincerely

Mike

Mike Rhodes

Property and Recreation Services Manager

Bournemouth and West Hampshire Water PLC

tel 01202 444614

fax 01202 597051

Edited by Deepseacodmaster
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Ivan, hope you are very well mate. :)

 

Thank you very much for your post, i can't check the content, however, it appears to be straight talking from the horse's mouth as opposed to devious double talk without any facts or figures to back it up. Never heard of bass being foul hooked with trebles for example, As an angler i know it's far easier to use live bait or a lure in any event, so i don't know why they considered using that as a reason to bluff us with. And again the reason given at the time was rod and line angling. According to your information that was also an untruth, yet it is now the rsa who are bearing the brunt of the unnecessary restrictions.

 

Aimed at one or two individualls, so where is the decimation, loads of exaggeration, no doubt. To impose rules and regulation on the rsa on the basis of the above is abhorrent as far as i'm concerned. So shame on those who were party to it.

 

Thanks again Ivan.

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.