Jump to content

Fluorocarbon pike traces


Andy_1984

Recommended Posts

Andy84,

 

""""The “intent” of this rule is to prevent any external damage to muskellunge captured while using

wire line, should the fish roll on the lure or bait while being played by the angler.""""
By your standards wire cuts pike to shreads. (One in 10 million receive fatal wounds - - no matter what the trace material is.)
My point is, as someone else pointed out, "when in Rome".
Phone
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The video says it all. 100lb fluorocarbon CAN be bitten through. End of.

hummm, not quite, we use that strength as normal while capturing ling, they have needle sharp teeth worse than conger.

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hummm, not quite, we use that strength as normal while capturing ling, they have needle sharp teeth worse than conger.

Yes but a pikes teeth are more like scalples than needles.

I have a serise of L shapped scard on the inside of my left thumb from a pike that decided to have a little shake when I chinned it and they were like razor cuts.

Species caught in 2020: Barbel. European Eel. Bleak. Perch. Pike.

Species caught in 2019: Pike. Bream. Tench. Chub. Common Carp. European Eel. Barbel. Bleak. Dace.

Species caught in 2018: Perch. Bream. Rainbow Trout. Brown Trout. Chub. Roach. Carp. European Eel.

Species caught in 2017: Siamese carp. Striped catfish. Rohu. Mekong catfish. Amazon red tail catfish. Arapaima. Black Minnow Shark. Perch. Chub. Brown Trout. Pike. Bream. Roach. Rudd. Bleak. Common Carp.

Species caught in 2016: Siamese carp. Jullien's golden carp. Striped catfish. Mekong catfish. Amazon red tail catfish. Arapaima. Alligator gar. Rohu. Black Minnow Shark. Roach, Bream, Perch, Ballan Wrasse. Rudd. Common Carp. Pike. Zander. Chub. Bleak.

Species caught in 2015: Brown Trout. Roach. Bream. Terrapin. Eel. Barbel. Pike. Chub.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Andy84,

 

""""The “intent” of this rule is to prevent any external damage to muskellunge captured while using

wire line, should the fish roll on the lure or bait while being played by the angler.""""
By your standards wire cuts pike to shreads. (One in 10 million receive fatal wounds - - no matter what the trace material is.)
My point is, as someone else pointed out, "when in Rome".
Phone

 

Without a doubt there are things possibly out of our control that we just have to put up with, but not with regards to trace material and the possibility that a pikes teeth will cut 100lb+ break fluoro.

 

I find it funny that the intent of the rule is to prevent external damage yet they allow the use of a gaff where legal <_<

Owner of Tacklesack.co.uk


Moderator at The-Pikers-Pit.co.uk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Andy84,

 

Yes, and to further complicate your delimma many are harvested for the pot.

 

Phone

 

That does not bother me so long as its sustainable. if we learned anything prior to 1974 its that the removal of large pike can lead to the demise of a good loch. Some fisheries still don't get this.

Owner of Tacklesack.co.uk


Moderator at The-Pikers-Pit.co.uk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.