Jump to content

NFFO response to open letter from scientists to government on MCZs


Elton

Recommended Posts

Anglers' Net Shopping Partners - Please Support Your Forum

CLICK HERE for all your Amazon purchases - books, photography equipment, DVD's and more!

CLICK HERE for Go Outdoors. HUGE discounts!

 

FOLLOW ANGLERS' NET ON TWITTER- CLICK HERE - @anglersnet

PLEASE 'LIKE' US ON FACEBOOK - CLICK HERE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

angling trusts mr Mitchell appears to be bitterly disappointed with a few guys regarding the lack of sea area closures as well, good job too.

:)

Quote mr michell.

Frankly, it’s been pathetic reading some commentators’ attempts to engage in the MCZ debate off the back of the Fish Fight march to Westminster in February. Over three years of conspicuous absence in the debate during the run up to the march and suddenly a lurch into the fray in the final stages seemingly just because there’s a high profile campaign to ...go to and do what? Lobby against the designation of MCZs in the presence of 2,000 marine conservationists, the national press and some of the most powerful environmental NGOs in the country? Sounds great if you want to alienate yourself and lose any credibility you think you have – so I’ll leave that one if it’s all the same to you. The words bolt, horse, door and stable sprang to mind as comment and opinion (of a sort) on the impact of MCZs suddenly spewed forth. Thanks, but it’s all too little, too late.

End quote.

 

and quote me:


Ist part of the latest blog from the trusts eco sea angling campaigns environmental manager. He thinks some are alienated, loosing credibility, left in the wilderness because they don't share their views that most of these sea area bans are to recover one species of worm, so they are not fit for purpose to be called mcz's. Even the minister has had his say and put forward so few to be designated. With the words loud and clear that the science is not there. What part of the ministers comments does this guy not understand. Who's gonna pay to police these waste of spaces, btw. That certainly isn't Mr Mitchell's concern. It's himself and the angling trust who are in the wilderness with so few individual members aboard. At one time they were talking about 100.000 so the 3,000 appears like it's got what it deserves. I didn't bother reading the rest of the blog as part of it is to do with the e u and it's failed cfp that the trust were so eager to see the rsa join. Don't feel too bad about it Mr Mitchell, some of the rsa who don't share the view that there is not enough legislation in place to affect their hobby are rather elated. The rsa only want to go fishing, yet the trust and co keep dragging them into un warranted political clap trap.

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.