global warming?

[Phone]

Chesters1,

 

Yes, as you say. BUT that isn't or shouldn't be motivated by Global Warming. That's just called NOT "chitting in your own mess kit".

 

Phone

[chesters1]

Yes even foxes rarely crap on their own doorstep ,man is happy to build doorsteps and crap on them and everyone elses

[Guest polaris]

It is amusing besides the rest of the diatribe the notion that universities are without vested interests is pathetic ,research in universities is paid for ,i did research for

 

You clearly do not have a clue how research is done ,how its funded ,how its manipulated and how its presented.

 

I am an honest person i wrote what i found but i found what i wrote changed ,several not so good results disappeared and so so ones highlighted ,its how research is funded and how universities make money .

 

I really think you nedd to draw back and reconsider your attitude that "scientists" are some sort of gods ,most of their work is done by technicians ( big name for poorly paid people) and students and if you are lucky the final work is only manipulated slightly from what is real

 

 

 

:lol

Diatribe?? I think you'd better read back your own stuff. As for not knowing how research is done ... it's my job. Or do you think you know someone else's job better than they do?

 

I think you are living in a conspiracists milieu, in which you believe everyone is corrupt and self serving. Sure there have been some dodgy scientists (though they are rare) and of course there are dubious companies who will always do their best to suppress anything against their interests - oil companies and global warming for instance. Even in the cases where research is falsified, it eventually gets found out. Scientists love to uncover someone else's bad work.

 

Universities are mainly funded from the public purse, and more nowadays from the students - that's why the recent cuts have had such an impact. They get some money from industry but the idea that all research is corrupt is risible. The fact that you dismiss the whole body of work on the causes of global warming shows your judgement is clouded on the whole issue. There are valid reasons to criticise the way higher education is going, but your unbalanced antagonism won't see them.

[Phone]

polaris,

 

Ha ha !!

 

Chesters1 has a "ksfi" on his computer. If he thinks he's got you wound up a bit he can become ruthless. That's what Resident Contrarian's do, rub elbows with the implausible visions of a lunatic fringe. (i.e. Phone)

 

And, you're probably wrong. Conspiracists KNOW NASA faked the moon landing and global warming is a hoax. For example, 37 percent of Americans believe that global warming is a hoax, 21 percent think that the US government is covering up evidence of alien existence and 28 percent believe a secret elite power with a globalist agenda is conspiring to rule the world.

 

Phone

 

 

 

 

 

 

ksfi - key stroke force indicator (how hard you are pounding out a response is insightful)

[chesters1]

My keyboard is very soft Phone like some heads

[Leon Roskilly]

An interesting read

 

http://m.rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/371/2001/20120294.full

[Phone]

Leon,

 

Thank heaven you found that url. It's what Chesters1 has been saying all along.

 

""""Climate sensitivity depends on the initial climate state, but potentially can be accurately inferred from precise palaeoclimate data

""""

 

(at least those of us in social sciences lie with words)

 

Phone

Edited September 18, 2013 by Phone

[corydoras]

My keyboard is very soft Phone like some heads

Is that the best you can do. Polaris has you sussed ou and he has only madw 22 posts. Attack the argument, not the person.

[barry luxton]

An interesting read

 

http://m.rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/371/2001/20120294.full

this is the bumf that I can't consider to be correct:

 

Humanity is now the dominant force driving changes in the Earth's atmospheric composition and climate [1]. The largest climate forcing today, i.e. the greatest imposed perturbation of the planet's energy balance [1,2], is the human-made increase in atmospheric greenhouse gases (GHGs), especially CO₂ from the burning of fossil fuels.

 

In the fifties and sixties we went through a period where you had a job to see your hand in front of your face due to smog, burning of fossil fuels, but no more, so why is it according to the above it's on the increase?

[barry luxton]

Is that the best you can do. Polaris has you sussed ou and he has only madw 22 posts. Attack the argument, not the person.

applies to polaris as well.