Jump to content

and the winner is:


barry luxton

Recommended Posts

I voted to join

There goes an honest man !

 

,,,but, you seem to have changed your mind

 

Post 3 (19-4-14) of The Yanks are Coming (this forum)

 

You said then that you "will very likely give UKIP a vote" ..."just to wake the others up" which suggests you are not entirely happy with the result of your original "Yes" vote

 

Patronising ? Well, all I can say is that I saw the present shambles that is today's EU coming a long time ago, which is why I voted "No" at the time. I thought I was right then, and nothing that has happened since has led me to change my mind. Yes, I know the phrase "I told you so" is annoying, but from your declared voting intentions it looks like deep down, you agree with me.

 

We can employ cheap foreign labour whether we are in the EU or not (look at the Mexicans employed in the Southern USA in defiance of immigration laws), but the rights or wrongs of doing so are another issue.

 

 

RNLI Governor

 

World species 471 : UK species 105 : English species 95 .

Certhia's world species - 215

Eclectic "husband and wife combined" world species 501

 

"Nothing matters very much, few things matter at all" - Plato

...only things like fresh bait and cold beer...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh dear oh dear! Just to help you out a bit Dave, I voted to join and so did the majority if I remember it correctly.

 

I could say I know a few who are in favour of staying in, and as for the "patronising attitude" then perhaps you should reread your very patronising...indeed it could be termed insulting post. I am not a fool, who is easily lead, no more than all the millions who voted to join in the first place.

 

Living in a predomitably farming area I also meet a lot of farmers who are very happy to employ immigrants at very low wages, how they must agonise about leaving the EU and losing all that cheap labour :) I talked with one yesterday and asked him what he would do, and he said " I will diversify".........rip out the fruit trees and run sheep or cattle or even plough up and go arable, so either way he would still be "allright mate " just have to pay a bit more for your food (smug smile)

 

Den

Den you opted to join a common market with free borders not a huge unelected mess where the leaders have absolute power and the elected people we (you) voted in have very little

Believe NOTHING anyones says or writes unless you witness it yourself and even then your eyes can deceive you

None of this "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" crap it just means i have at least two enemies!

 

There is only one opinion i listen to ,its mine and its ALWAYS right even when its wrong

 

Its far easier to curse the darkness than light one candle

 

Mathew 4:19

Grangers law : anything i say will  turn out the opposite or not happen at all!

Life insurance? you wont enjoy a penny!

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was too young to vote in 73 but remember the tv reports of produce being ploughed back into the ground so it was worth growing for the producers :rolleyes:

Number me with Rage it,s a shame Number me in Haste its a shame

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its still being plowed back in ,not because its so plentiful its cheap but to artificially keep the price high ,and ofcourse theres plenty of EU handouts for growing it

Believe NOTHING anyones says or writes unless you witness it yourself and even then your eyes can deceive you

None of this "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" crap it just means i have at least two enemies!

 

There is only one opinion i listen to ,its mine and its ALWAYS right even when its wrong

 

Its far easier to curse the darkness than light one candle

 

Mathew 4:19

Grangers law : anything i say will  turn out the opposite or not happen at all!

Life insurance? you wont enjoy a penny!

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its still being plowed back in ,not because its so plentiful its cheap but to artificially keep the price high ,and ofcourse theres plenty of EU handouts for growing it

I thought thats what I meant lol

Number me with Rage it,s a shame Number me in Haste its a shame

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One (only one ) of the reasons I voted for the EU was because I considered we would all be a bit safer if we were "all on the same side" I still consider that a valid reason.

 

I was "bombed out" 3 times during the last war, pretty certain it was the reason my Mum got cancer, and no way did I ever want to live through another war...............there is something a bit special in "not actually hearing the explosion that ripped the top of the house off"

 

A quick question..."do you think that England (not the UK ) would survive as a prosperous country outside the EU ? " It's only "the city" which keeps us afloat at the moment. What's the betting they would move to Brussels if we left the EU.

 

For good or worse, we are all a lot safer in than out.

 

Den

 

Edit.. "just to wake the others up" is probably what a lot of other people did as well. the real test will come at the next UK elections. I actually ended up voting Lib Dem, the only party to state that they would stay in the EU.. I knew they had no chance of winning, but I had to vote with what I considered to be the best for myself and family.

Edited by poledark

"When through the woods and forest glades I wanderAnd hear the birds sing sweetly in the trees;When I look down from lofty mountain grandeur,And hear the brook, and feel the breeze;and see the waves crash on the shore,Then sings my soul..................

for all you Spodders. https://youtu.be/XYxsY-FbSic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One (only one ) of the reasons I voted for the EU was because I considered we would all be a bit safer if we were "all on the same side" I still consider that a valid reason.

 

I was "bombed out" 3 times during the last war, pretty certain it was the reason my Mum got cancer, and no way did I ever want to live through another war...............there is something a bit special in "not actually hearing the explosion that ripped the top of the house off"

 

A quick question..."do you think that England (not the UK ) would survive as a prosperous country outside the EU ? " It's only "the city" which keeps us afloat at the moment. What's the betting they would move to Brussels if we left the EU.

 

For good or worse, we are all a lot safer in than out.

 

Den

Personally I think the e u is the cause of today's problems in particular with it's open door policies. 2 million where let in during the last admin, good or bad, there was no discrimination between the two as to who where allowed in. That's not even speaking about the illegals that also came over, I don't know how many are still here or have been given amnesty. So thanks to the e u I feel a lot more unsafe and it also feels as if the u k is fit to burst with regards to coping and providing services etc.

Edited by barry luxton

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the EU will find itself at war with someone sooner or later.

 

It's more than likely to be with itself. Would that be classed as a civil war, or a revolution?

 

John.

  • Like 1

Angling is more than just catching fish, if it wasn't it would just be called 'catching'......... John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.