E U. Should we stay or should we leave.

[Ken L]

This is going to be fun.

Now that Barnier appears to have ruled out a further extension, "No Deal" Brexiters in parliament know that they get what they want if they vote against Boris.

Meanwhile, remainers are forced to vote for his deal if they want to avoid leaving without a deal.

 

We live in interesting times.

[leedafeeder]

I don't think they have fully ruled out an extension. I don't see Boris winning the vote though, but what do I know

[Martin56]

All Boris Johnson & co is saying "How much money am I going to come out with".

[Ken L]

All Boris Johnson & co is saying "How much money am I going to come out with".

 

And your evidence for that claim is?

It seems that the more likely situation is that those trying to block Brexit are the ones with the dodgy financial ulterior motives - because in many cases, we can see the money moving.

[Martin56]

And your evidence for that claim is?

It seems that the more likely situation is that those trying to block Brexit are the ones with the dodgy financial ulterior motives - because in many cases, we can see the money moving.

They're all at it - Public school boys + dodgy blonde haircut.

[big_cod]

This is going to be fun.

Now that Barnier appears to have ruled out a further extension, "No Deal" Brexiters in parliament know that they get what they want if they vote against Boris.

Meanwhile, remainers are forced to vote for his deal if they want to avoid leaving without a deal.

 

We live in interesting times.

Barnier cant rule anything out he is just a spokesman it is not in his power . Edited October 19, 2019 by big_cod

[Phone]

All,

 

WHAT?! - A new referendum but it wouldn’t necessarily be a “second referendum” as many had envisaged. Rather than redoing the vote from 2016, this would instead be a “confirmatory vote” that specifically focused on approving or rejecting Johnson’s deal.

 

Even the Washington Post and NY Times can't figure out when a referendum is not a referendum.

 

​And if it is a referendum doesn't parliament still have to approve. Isn't that exactly where you are now with the existing referendum

 

Phone

[Mikench]

You'll all know what the outcome might be soon enough. I doubt any of us will have scope for happiness however.

[Ken L]

Barnier cant rule anything out he is just a spokesman it is not in his power .

So who does have the power and who elected them?

[chesters1]

All,

 

WHAT?! - A new referendum but it wouldnt necessarily be a second referendum as many had envisaged. Rather than redoing the vote from 2016, this would instead be a confirmatory vote that specifically focused on approving or rejecting Johnsons deal.

 

Even the Washington Post and NY Times can't figure out when a referendum is not a referendum.

 

​And if it is a referendum doesn't parliament still have to approve. Isn't that exactly where you are now with the existing referendum

 

Phone

Any new referendum is ensuring we remain ,there will be 3 questions i bet remain,leave with a deal or leave without a deal ,remain will win because the leave vote is split! All ends nicely tied up ,the remainers get their way and "democracy" reigns ,unfortunately democracy wont extend to two questions as before! Edited October 19, 2019 by chesters1