Jump to content

E U. Should we stay or should we leave.


barry luxton

BREXIT in or out  

52 members have voted

  1. 1. should the u k remain in or leave the E U

    • vote to stay in
      12
    • vote to stay in following e u rule change
      2
    • vote to leave
      38


Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, gozzer said:

I agree that his thread has run it's course, but it only has a couple of pages, and 30 odd replies to reach the 'milestones of 1000 pages, and 10,000 replies. I realise that if we took out the repeats it would be a lot shorter, but no thread has achieved anywhere near this length, and it would be a shame, IMO, if it was closed before it did.

It's been a very divisive thread, and, I believe, has cost AN some members, but it's kept people posting during a very dry spell when not much else was happening. 

John.

I agree!

 

  • Thanks 1

"My imaginary friend doesn't like your imaginary friend is no basis for armed conflict...."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, gozzer said:

I agree that his thread has run it's course, but it only has a couple of pages, and 30 odd replies to reach the 'milestones of 1000 pages, and 10,000 replies. I realise that if we took out the repeats it would be a lot shorter, but no thread has achieved anywhere near this length, and it would be a shame, IMO, if it was closed before it did.

It's been a very divisive thread, and, I believe, has cost AN some members, but it's kept people posting during a very dry spell when not much else was happening. 

John.

But there again, perhaps it will make it to 1000 pages.

  • Thanks 1

"My imaginary friend doesn't like your imaginary friend is no basis for armed conflict...."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, gozzer said:

I agree that his thread has run it's course, but it only has a couple of pages, and 30 odd replies to reach the 'milestones of 1000 pages, and 10,000 replies. I realise that if we took out the repeats it would be a lot shorter, but no thread has achieved anywhere near this length, and it would be a shame, IMO, if it was closed before it did.

It's been a very divisive thread, and, I believe, has cost AN some members, but it's kept people posting during a very dry spell when not much else was happening. 

John.

How many replies to go?

  • Haha 1

"My imaginary friend doesn't like your imaginary friend is no basis for armed conflict...."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Huge_Vitae said:

But there again, perhaps it will make it to 1000 pages.

not for the want of tryin

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, barry luxton said:

not for the want of tryin

Do you think so. ?

  • Haha 1

"My imaginary friend doesn't like your imaginary friend is no basis for armed conflict...."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do or maybe not

Believe NOTHING anyones says or writes unless you witness it yourself and even then your eyes can deceive you

None of this "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" crap it just means i have at least two enemies!

 

There is only one opinion i listen to ,its mine and its ALWAYS right even when its wrong

 

Its far easier to curse the darkness than light one candle

 

Mathew 4:19

Grangers law : anything i say will  turn out the opposite or not happen at all!

Life insurance? you wont enjoy a penny!

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, gozzer said:

I believe, has cost AN some members, but it's kept people posting during a very dry spell when not much else was happening. 

John.

I'm still here, but rarely post now, especially on this topic. The main protagonist against Brexit here writes unintelligible posts in which they expect the reader to insert their own punctuation to make any sense of it - when you can make any sense of it it's mostly bullshine anyway. When they did use punctuation recently they didn't understand it, we had we're instead of were, or was it where, or even weir - I don't know cos I stopped reading it, the first read made no sense and that was enough for me to give up.

I say let it die, however close to whatever record it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ayjay said:

I'm still here, but rarely post now, especially on this topic. The main protagonist against Brexit here writes unintelligible posts in which they expect the reader to insert their own punctuation to make any sense of it - when you can make any sense of it it's mostly bullshine anyway. When they did use punctuation recently they didn't understand it, we had we're instead of were, or was it where, or even weir - I don't know cos I stopped reading it, the first read made no sense and that was enough for me to give up.

I say let it die, however close to whatever record it is.

Brexit or brexshit which is it .

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-cost-economy-deal-boris-johnson-withdrawal-agreement-nhs-a9157461.html

Edited by big_cod

http://sea-otter2.co.uk/

Probably Whitby's most consistent charterboat

Untitled-1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, big_cod said:

why are you attempting to denigrate Brexit with a history lesson,  it's 3 months old. Have you also checked out it's provenance?

quote: The Centre for European Reform is an award-winning, independent think-tank that seeks to achieve an open, outward-looking, influential and prosperous European Union, with close ties to its neighbours and allies. The CER’s work in pursuit of those aims is guided by the same principles that have served us well since our foundation in 1998: sober, rigorous and realistic analysis, combined with constructive proposals for reform.

and it is so one sided and lop sided it stinks.

The CER’s engagement with senior figures in Europe is reflected in the speakers we attract to our events. In recent years, guests have included Emmanuel Macron, Martin Selmayr and Michel Barnier. These high-level contacts enhance the accuracy of our analysis and enable us to refine our proposals, both in publications and in the private briefings that we provide to senior officials, ministers and European commissioners. 

 

quote again: realistic analysis, combined with constructive proposals for reform. The reason why Brexit is going to happen is  due to intransigence and lack of accountability, far more close to reality than anything you can put up.

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.