Jump to content

E U. Should we stay or should we leave.

barry luxton

By barry luxton
in Non-Fishing Chat

 Share

BREXIT in or out  

52 members have voted

  1. 1. should the u k remain in or leave the E U

    • vote to stay in
      12
    • vote to stay in following e u rule change
      2
    • vote to leave
      38

Recommended Posts

barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
  • Author
Posted
10 minutes ago, big_cod said:

Barry the tories got just 1% more of the vote than they did in the previous election 1% and they got 80 more seats the electoral system is flawed and now they have to deliver immigration ? get ready bas egg on your face ? 

egg on my face, why is that? Like many thousands of others I have questioned my mp numerous times since the referendum to try and point them in the direction of where I would like to see the removal of the e u's federal political expansionist regime, that no one has ever given their mandate to. How many emails have you sent.  Why should I consider that I need to reproach myself.

 

nothing wrong with the electoral system unless your in second or third place.

did the u k have a referendum on that within the government of Cameron and clegg, now what was the result of that one. How did you vote on that  I have to ask.

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 10.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • big_cod

    2467

  • chesters1

    1900

  • barry luxton

    1362

  • Ken L

    996

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Dales
Dales

I have always been Pro Europe and despite not liking a lot of the silly rules and regulations that comes with membership I always thought that the general idea of membership is a good thing.   Howev

Huge_Vitae
Huge_Vitae

Far better to have a frog in your throat for a year or so than the French, Germans and a few others shafting you in the ass for decades to come. Oh look Ethel, a short post.

chesters1
chesters1

Cheap scallops?

Posted Images

big_cod Member

big_cod

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, barry luxton said:

egg on my face, why is that? Like many thousands of others I have questioned my mp numerous times since the referendum to try and point them in the direction of where I would like to see the removal of the e u's federal political expansionist regime, that no one has ever given their mandate to. How many emails have you sent.  Why should I consider that I need to reproach myself.

 

nothing wrong with the electoral system unless your in second or third place.

did the u k have a referendum on that within the government of Cameron and clegg, now what was the result of that one. How did you vote on that  I have to ask.

You have tried to point your MP in the right direction ? Barry your not serious are you  surly please that’s a corker .

http://sea-otter2.co.uk/

Probably Whitby's most consistent charterboat

Untitled-1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, big_cod said:

You have tried to point your MP in the right direction ? Barry your not serious are you  surly please that’s a corker .

they work for you. They are called public servants, did you not know that ?

 

or is it the case that your conservative m p doesn't share your assumption that the right answer is to remain within the e u's political empire.  

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
big_cod Member

big_cod

Posted
Posted (edited)
12 minutes ago, barry luxton said:

they work for you. They are called public servants, did you not know that ?

 

or is it the case that your conservative m p doesn't share your assumption that the right answer is to remain within the e u's political empire.  

:bigemo_harabe_net-163::bigemo_harabe_net-163::bigemo_harabe_net-163: They work for you  ? so what were they all doing voting constantly against  getting brexit over the line when  there constituents voted leave including Boris ? Johnson you know why because so many were  remainders now there backsides have collapsed and have gone with the flow but do they believe in brexit no .

Edited by big_cod

http://sea-otter2.co.uk/

Probably Whitby's most consistent charterboat

Untitled-1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Huge_Vitae Member

Huge_Vitae

Posted
Posted

People can sit and analyse the votes as much as they like, they can add on Uncast votes here there and everywhere if it floats their boat.

In simple terms there was a referendum to decide if the U.K. should switch to PR and the result was NO.

Equally simplistic was the referendum to leave the EU and the result was to Leave.

Then there were requests to have another Referendum on multiple occasions that were rejected by Parliament.

It then went to the U.K. electorate in a General Election.

Now, after the leave vote was, once again confirmed by majority they want to go back and change the PR vote!

But still a few wish to change every referendum and election that did not go in their favour simply because they are right and the majority are wrong! Personally I can see why those who follow that train of thought support the EU. After all, it is what the EU think that matters to them, the fact that the EU leaders are not elected nor govern by mandate of any majority is insignificant, and yet they continue to find reasons why any democratic vote is not, well, democratic!  
 

Oh well, 14 days and counting.

  • Like 1

"My imaginary friend doesn't like your imaginary friend is no basis for armed conflict...."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
big_cod Member

big_cod

Posted
Posted (edited)

If we figures are correct boris Johnson wants jailing.

https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/brexit-cost-reach-billions-highest-boris-johnson-uk-economic-study-2020-1-1028809389

Edited by big_cod

http://sea-otter2.co.uk/

Probably Whitby's most consistent charterboat

Untitled-1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
*Ant* Member

*Ant*

Posted
Posted

Paul, you are crazy fella. You really do need to chill a tad and accept that the majority of the British public want out of the EU and voted Tory as they seemed to be the only logical choice to get it done. Who knows, maybe just maybe your fears may turn out to be well founded, and in that case you can come on here and call us all a bunch of utter imbeciles. But chill fella. ;)

 

 

Eat right, stay fit, die anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
big_cod Member

big_cod

Posted
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, *Ant* said:

Paul, you are crazy fella. You really do need to chill a tad and accept that the majority of the British public want out of the EU and voted Tory as they seemed to be the only logical choice to get it done. Who knows, maybe just maybe your fears may turn out to be well founded, and in that case you can come on here and call us all a bunch of utter imbeciles. But chill fella. ;)

I am sorry Ant if anything like these  figures were  published prior the referendum brexit would never ever have got off the ground somebody should be accountable Boris Johnson is the main culprit more spare cash for NHS no a hell of a lot less they are borrowing it to put in the NHS .

We maybe leaving true but those figures are a disgrace the British public were lied to they say we live in a democracy but a democracy influenced by the press the public lied to daily that’s not democracy , if  those figures are correct how can anybody say brexit is right thing to do they must be completely mad .

Edited by big_cod

http://sea-otter2.co.uk/

Probably Whitby's most consistent charterboat

Untitled-1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chesters1 Member

chesters1

Posted
Posted (edited)

The  people were lied to broken record again

WOW polititions lied blimey thats new! Dont you just think the people were **** off with the EU taking to much power away from our decicion makers and they retaliated?

Dont you just think they saw the ever increasing scenario of the EU becoming larger and our tax paying people having to pay a lot of failed countries great sums of money to bail them out while they did f all to help them selves?

Dont you just think people were fed up of seeing germany and france make the riules and us touching our forelocks doing what they demand?

Dont you just think people were fed up with high housing prices because a few million EU citizens kept their kids off the housing ladder by raising the demand

Dont you just think people were just sick and tired of being turned into a melting pot they didnt want to be in?

Edited by chesters1

Believe NOTHING anyones says or writes unless you witness it yourself and even then your eyes can deceive you

None of this "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" crap it just means i have at least two enemies!

 

There is only one opinion i listen to ,its mine and its ALWAYS right even when its wrong

 

Its far easier to curse the darkness than light one candle

 

Mathew 4:19

Grangers law : anything i say will  turn out the opposite or not happen at all!

Life insurance? you wont enjoy a penny!

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ayjay Member

ayjay

Posted
Posted
On 1/10/2020 at 4:28 PM, big_cod said:

Anybody who really wanted brexit would have voted Tory  end of but 4 million turned there backs on brexit who voted for it in 2016 .

You're wrong (as usual).

I really want Brexit, but I didn't vote Tory.

I didn't vote for anyone.

I spoilt my ballot paper by writing NO DEAL BREXIT NOW across it.

There wasn't a candidate that I was prepared to vote for in my constituency.  Of the four on offer, one was a Tory and the other three were remainers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.

  I accept