So explain why France has a much more generous benefits system than do we?
that's not the question. You could easily add that they have enjoyed a permanent farming subsidy,yet the u k has given back the rebate for imbalance, more fish quota from the channel 70% cod quota and for a none quota species, 9 times more bass take than the u k, they have landed more year on year creating an alleged stock falling off a cliff. Yet the u k charter fishing fleet are the ones in the firing line. etc etc. The question really is why should the u k be part of this continued imbalance and to what benefit to the u k.
the French economy and unemployment don't look too special at the mo does it.
The u k appears to be, being held back by the e u state.
Did you read Bernhard Inghams comments yesterday,
quote: “Why should the U.K. throw another £12 billion a year down these mafia and assorted criminal drains?” Ingham wrote this week in the Yorkshire Post. “Why we should ever want to be a member of it at all when the institution is corrupt and so riddled with fraud that the auditors have felt unable to sign off its accounts for nigh on 20 years.”
Edited by barry luxton, 30 January 2016 - 08:41 AM.
Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.
New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.
Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.
Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.
Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.
Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.
Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.
new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.
Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..