Jump to content

E U. Should we stay or should we leave.

barry luxton

By barry luxton
in Non-Fishing Chat

 Share

BREXIT in or out  

52 members have voted

  1. 1. should the u k remain in or leave the E U

    • vote to stay in
      12
    • vote to stay in following e u rule change
      2
    • vote to leave
      38

Recommended Posts

barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
  • Author
Posted
12 hours ago, big_cod said:

 

Brexit is costing every single households a fortune whether it’s filling the car up heating your home going on holiday you name it fuel up everything up most are just to stupid to see it and think brexit is great ?. crack on !!!

you wanna see the u k save some expenditure, look at this lot it's no longer going to support.

Civil servant staff working for the EU: 32,000

EU Commission 7,500

EU Parliament 3,500

Council of the European Union This does not include MPs and their staff. In 2017 this costed around 6% of the EU budget of £157.9 Billion (somewhere in the region of £9.75 BILLION)

And:

Around 120 cars are put on for the 751 MEPs to make the 450km (280 miles) journey from Belgium to France, however the vast amount of officials do not take up the offer. The fleet of vehicles is understood to cost the EU millions each year. In November, just 25 MEPs were driven to the plenary session in Strasbourg.

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 10.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • big_cod

    2467

  • chesters1

    1900

  • barry luxton

    1362

  • Ken L

    996

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Dales
Dales

I have always been Pro Europe and despite not liking a lot of the silly rules and regulations that comes with membership I always thought that the general idea of membership is a good thing.   Howev

Huge_Vitae
Huge_Vitae

Far better to have a frog in your throat for a year or so than the French, Germans and a few others shafting you in the ass for decades to come. Oh look Ethel, a short post.

chesters1
chesters1

Cheap scallops?

Posted Images

barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
  • Author
Posted
14 hours ago, big_cod said:

Brexshit and **** and **** and more and more **** ?

https://fullfact.org/online/viral-brexit-costs-post-wrong/

yet again within your own small e u protected bubble, you keep on quoting the 70 billion loss,  you clutch at straws in the belief that leaving your nirvana will be disastrous. Yet again you don't read or comprehend what is within your link, i'll do it for you with copy and paste. Note included are the words clearly telling you that the money hasn't been spent, it is an assumption, a guestimate, a could be, might be possibility. One thing for sure the out of the 27 countries 8 have money to spend (Belgium never will as it takes twice as much out as it puts in) but due to their fragile quantative eased economies they don't want to spend it and it is becoming weaker with  less value by the day. The e u does not have an answer for growth and prosperity, what it is, is a protectionist political trading block, who will now spend all it's efforts in becoming more politically constrained, while espousing the apolitical lie,  also without anyone providing their mandate to. it has been sussed out.Why do you want to remain?

You need a new campaign to latch onto, the labour opposition need help in clearing out the momentous Marxist left wing, how about that one, give it 150% support and it may become something viable or fit for purpose, perhaps.

quote your link:

91p per person per day assumes that the cost of Brexit has been around £66 billion in the three years since 2016. This might have been taken from a report by the financial services company Standard and Poor’s, which estimated the same cost in the two and a half years since the 2016 referendum. That’s a slightly different time period, but it doesn’t make a big difference to the numbers.

The graphic misrepresents what Standard and Poor’s found. It didn’t say £66 billion had been “spent” on Brexit (presumably by the government); it estimated that Brexit had cost the UK economy £66 billion in terms of lost GDP growth. This doesn’t mean the economy got £66 billion smaller—it means that UK GDP would have grown by £66 billion more had the UK not voted to leave, according to this estimate.

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
big_cod Member

big_cod

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, barry luxton said:

yet again within your own small e u protected bubble, you keep on quoting the 70 billion loss,  you clutch at straws in the belief that leaving your nirvana will be disastrous. Yet again you don't read or comprehend what is within your link, i'll do it for you with copy and paste. Note included are the words clearly telling you that the money hasn't been spent, it is an assumption, a guestimate, a could be, might be possibility. One thing for sure the out of the 27 countries 8 have money to spend (Belgium never will as it takes twice as much out as it puts in) but due to their fragile quantative eased economies they don't want to spend it and it is becoming weaker with  less value by the day. The e u does not have an answer for growth and prosperity, what it is, is a protectionist political trading block, who will now spend all it's efforts in becoming more politically constrained, while espousing the apolitical lie,  also without anyone providing their mandate to. it has been sussed out.Why do you want to remain?

You need a new campaign to latch onto, the labour opposition need help in clearing out the momentous Marxist left wing, how about that one, give it 150% support and it may become something viable or fit for purpose, perhaps.

quote your link:

91p per person per day assumes that the cost of Brexit has been around £66 billion in the three years since 2016. This might have been taken from a report by the financial services company Standard and Poor’s, which estimated the same cost in the two and a half years since the 2016 referendum. That’s a slightly different time period, but it doesn’t make a big difference to the numbers.

The graphic misrepresents what Standard and Poor’s found. It didn’t say £66 billion had been “spent” on Brexit (presumably by the government); it estimated that Brexit had cost the UK economy £66 billion in terms of lost GDP growth. This doesn’t mean the economy got £66 billion smaller—it means that UK GDP would have grown by £66 billion more had the UK not voted to leave, according to this estimate.

So blacks white then denial denial denial but Barry Like  I told you brace yourself the very best is still to come with brexit I am still waiting to hear which brexit it is .We are getting nothing in black and white of course not fishing will be the biggest let down when the dust settles and if Scotland somehow end up  going independent that’s literally the end of our whitefish fleet game over as the majority of the English boats fish out of Peterhead  .

The promises the  let downs the betrayals the lies all to come you will able tick them off one by one very soon do you think immigration might go up after brexit now that would be a corker let’s wait and see .

And Brexiteers all they seem to do is say how bad the EU is and how bad they want them to do not we are leaving good luck I no it’s the case that if brexit is a disaster and believe me they will **** themselves in case it is they hope the. EU will follow suit as always the brits love a loser .

Now this is our PM his own words who just before the referendum was a remainder then because  he thought brexit night just  win he changed hats the mans a fraud 

You will love this Barry enjoy this is our PM and his own words .

https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/news/this-is-the-column-boris-johnson-wants-you-to-forget/05/09/

 

Edited by big_cod
  • Confused 1

http://sea-otter2.co.uk/

Probably Whitby's most consistent charterboat

Untitled-1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 hours ago, big_cod said:

So blacks white then denial denial denial but Barry Like  I told you brace yourself the very best is still to come with brexit I am still waiting to hear which brexit it is .We are getting nothing in black and white of course not fishing will be the biggest let down when the dust settles and if Scotland somehow end up  going independent that’s literally the end of our whitefish fleet game over as the majority of the English boats fish out of Peterhead  .

The promises the  let downs the betrayals the lies all to come you will able tick them off one by one very soon do you think immigration might go up after brexit now that would be a corker let’s wait and see .

And Brexiteers all they seem to do is say how bad the EU is and how bad they want them to do not we are leaving good luck I no it’s the case that if brexit is a disaster and believe me they will **** themselves in case it is they hope the. EU will follow suit as always the brits love a loser .

Now this is our PM his own words who just before the referendum was a remainder then because  he thought brexit night just  win he changed hats the mans a fraud 

You will love this Barry enjoy this is our PM and his own words .

https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/news/this-is-the-column-boris-johnson-wants-you-to-forget/05/09/

 

:bigemo_harabe_net-163::bigemo_harabe_net-163::bigemo_harabe_net-163:

 

yes I did enjoy reading that, I first read it 7 years ago, that was the time Hammond supported leaving the e u as did Corbyn. Boris was referring to the u k needs to get it 's finger out, as for Brexit, it had nothing to do with it, weren't even on the table as Cameron hadn't gone bleating to the megliomaniniacs at that time. You trying to offer up history lessons, got anything of value to read.

You checked the author of this link, he writes for the big issue, do you participate in taking that one?

However, it is clear both of those guys did a 180. ignoring the will of the referendum, where are they now I have to ask. and as for boris, he has got the message and got with the programme of supporting the wishes of the electorate, hence the downfall of those other two useless articles.

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
big_cod Member

big_cod

Posted
Posted (edited)
47 minutes ago, barry luxton said:

:bigemo_harabe_net-163::bigemo_harabe_net-163::bigemo_harabe_net-163:

 

yes I did enjoy reading that, I first read it 7 years ago, that was the time Hammond supported leaving the e u as did Corbyn. Boris was referring to the u k needs to get it 's finger out, as for Brexit, it had nothing to do with it, weren't even on the table as Cameron hadn't gone bleating to the megliomaniniacs at that time. You trying to offer up history lessons, got anything of value to read.

You checked the author of this link, he writes for the big issue, do you participate in taking that one?

However, it is clear both of those guys did a 180. ignoring the will of the referendum, where are they now I have to ask. and as for boris, he has got the message and got with the programme of supporting the wishes of the electorate, hence the downfall of those other two useless articles.

? thar article  was in boris Johnson column in the telegraph the one he got  the sack  from for lying .

Well  I never ?

https://www.ft.com/content/e6678366-21a1-11ea-b8a1-584213ee7b2b

Edited by big_cod
  • Confused 1

http://sea-otter2.co.uk/

Probably Whitby's most consistent charterboat

Untitled-1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
  • Author
Posted
18 minutes ago, big_cod said:

? thar article  was in boris Johnson column in the telegraph the one he got  the sack  from for lying .

Well  I never ?

https://www.ft.com/content/e6678366-21a1-11ea-b8a1-584213ee7b2b

your having a laugh, from the big issue to the times, your a rather big swinger ain't you, as I don't subscribe to the times, can you copy and paste to read about whatever you are on about.

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
big_cod Member

big_cod

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, barry luxton said:

your having a laugh, from the big issue to the times, your a rather big swinger ain't you, as I don't subscribe to the times, can you copy and paste to read about whatever you are on about.

What does the headline say ,  No need to subscribe  this coming from a pro business paper looks like labours policy is in agreement with business who would have thought .

Edited by big_cod
  • Confused 1

http://sea-otter2.co.uk/

Probably Whitby's most consistent charterboat

Untitled-1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
  • Author
Posted
37 minutes ago, big_cod said:

What does the headline No need to subscribe  say coming from a pro business paper looks like labours policy is in agreement with the business who would have thought .

Quote your headline: Maybe Corbyn was right and Labour ‘won the argument’ after all?

 

Hahahahaha, 4 million labour voters were let down by their political bents. That's why very many supported boris. Your really suffering digging your sand pit political hole without anything

To shore it up with.

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.

  I accept