Posted 02 January 2015 - 05:44 PM
Yes mr salter don't mind if rsa are to have 2-3 bag limits placed on anglers regarding the bass. Really. The damage that that could impose on the charter fleet can't be quantified. That's following the e u's recommendation of one bass per angler after TAT went and insisted on a 80% reduction unilaterally in the u k on the stock. Now TAT has asked the e u for again, emergency measures to protect the bass stock to prevent it from falling off a cliff. What they don't tell all is the evidence they have of the bass falling off the cliff comes from surveys more than two years old and they won't comment on newer surveys as it doesn't fit in with their argument of a stock crashing.
And excuse me TAT you want to see the u k industry and rsa restricted, here's a sample of the French fishing for bass, your bonkers TAT get off the plot, you don't have the acumen to deal with the current situation:
Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.
New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.
Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.
Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.
Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.
Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.
Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.
new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.
Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..