Jump to content

severus

Members
  • Posts

    1881
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by severus

  1. We've received about two feet of snow the past few days here where I live in Michigan. This morning a female mallard flew out of the creek into my yard, thinking she would walk to my bird feeders for a meal. She sank. At first all I could see was her head poking up and looking about like a periscope on a submarine, then she pulled herself up and eventually flew off. It was quite amusing.

     

    snowymallard.jpg

  2. Gunsmoke - Western

    H.R. Puff 'n' Stuff

    Hancock's Half-Hour

    Callan

    Z cars

    Combat..WW2 action (I remember Combat. We have one channel that televises it)

    Hill Street Blues

    ironside

    Muffin the mule

    Noggin the Nog

    Bill & Ben the Flowerpot Men

    Magic Roundabout

    Dallas

    Dynasty

    Starski & Hutch

    Emergency - Ward 10

    Dixon of dock green

    Z - Cars

    The A Team

    LA Law

    NYPD Blue

    Cagney and Lacey

    Magnum PI

    The Perils of Penelope Pitstop

    M.A.S.H.

    Hawaii Five O

    Blakes Seven

    The Adventure Game

    Monkey

    The Time Tunnel

  3. A post from Kleinboet made me consider this!

     

    Could the actions of a forgien Leader ever be so reprehensable that Assasination be Justified from the wests (and wider worlds) piont of View?

     

    I say No! that is Where Anarcy Lies although its hard to stick to your morals in the light of the Sudanise and Zimbarbwian situations, another reason is It could wwell be a two way door, that would be opend.

     

     

    What do you folks think?

     

    For what it's worth, I would have to agree with your view, although notable exceptions may have to be made on occasion for men who caused widespread misery and death for the sake of their own selfish motives. Hitler, Napoleon Bonaparte, and Pol Pot come to mind. But it seems that most assassinations occur for purely political reasons, which, as you point out, is reprehensible.

  4. In the case of WWI, the US entry was so late as to have no impact upon the final outcome.

    Wow, where did you get that piece of pseudo-history? And do you really believe it?

     

    No, the US did not single handedly win WWI. That would be a slap in the face of all the British and French war dead and wounded, not to mention all the soldiers who were forced to live like wild animals for four years in the muddy trenches. But your assertion that US involvement had no bearing on the final outcome is absurd and completely without basis in fact.

     

    The fact is, the Germans launched their 1918 spring offensives as a last-ditch gamble to end the war because time was on the side of the Allies. Food stocks were running out thanks to the Royal Naval blockade, plus the fact that German nitrate supplies went into munitions instead of crops. Ludendorff understood that the eventual weight of a million fresh US soldiers would turn the tide against him. So he rolled the dice and lost. Deteriorating conditions in Germany caused riots and mutinies which eroded authority and collapsed the will of the High Command to fight on. So they quit. Don't take my word on any of this, either - it's in every history book I've ever read, and you can find it there.

     

    You seem to have a good grasp of history according to what you've written earlier in this thread, but your above statement is way, way off the mark. You fault Americans for slanting history, yet you offer this??

  5. You'd have to dig real deep to find anything like this going on anywhere in modern Europe.

     

    If it hadn't been for the French the US might still be a colony of the UK.

    Nothing like that in modern Europe? Cory, I'm shocked. You stated earlier that you didn't believe in fairy tales, and now this. You've been reading too many French newspapers and perhaps watching too much Mission Impossible.

     

    As for the USA being a colony of the UK, perhaps your'e right, perhaps not. But be absolutely sure of this and make no mistake, mister: France is a free nation today only because British, Canadian, and American blood was shed on her behalf. Don't ever forget that. I'll bet that's not part of the school curriculum there, is it?

     

    Anyhow, I'm weary of your half-truth complaints about just how bad things are over here. You seem to have an activist outlook, so perhaps you should direct your ire toward your beloved France. It has so much to be humble about.

  6. How do you square that with this, state laws that let parents who allow their children to die because the parents believe in bronze age fairy tales get away with what is next to murder?

    Hmmm, isn't that the function of constitutional government, to correct arcane laws and loopholes that cause undue harm to innocents? You seem to be laboring under the misapprehension that sensational news such as this is routine, widespread, and meekly accepted by the majority over here in the States. It is not. It would be just as easy for me to state that the Reign of Terror and Holocaust are the natural political bent of Frenchmen and Germans, however absurd that notion might be. And by the way, it is.

     

    Sure, it was murder. Hanging's too good for the parents. But quite frankly I seriously doubt that I would have to dig very deep to find equivalent news over there in sunny France. Or perhaps even more outrageous. You don't really believe that all Frenchmen are stainless, do you? Or that they've achieved any sort of superior enlightenment beyond the ordinary?

  7. The US IS MEANT TO BE a secular state. That's what Establishment Clause in the First Amendment to The Bill of Rights states.

    For the sake of debate allow me to differ, cory, if I understand you correctly. The First Amendment guarantees freedom of religion, not freedom from it, if that's what you mean by secular state. The framers of the Constitution saw what happened to European states that integrated religion and politics and simply wanted no part of that. To me that means an atheist has as much right to practice his belief system as does a Jew or Christian, as long as their beliefs don't harm others in the manner of Charlie Manson, Jim Jones, or the Branch Davidians.

     

    As a side note, any mention of God in Federal documents or on courthouse buildings, currency, and coins should be considered generic for the sake of all religions, as was intended. For example, you'll never see the name Jesus Christ used in place of God.

     

    Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    — The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

  8. Thanks for sharing, cory. Several years ago I was remodeling the exterior of a client's home and kept hearing his voice inside the house throughout the day, even though I knew he was gone. It was his African Grey parrot. That bird had an absolute mastery of his voice to the point where it had the ability to call the family dog into the room, which it often did. It was incredible.

  9. Interesting comments, all. Just like to say that Obama is the connsumate politician, a genuine poet (see quote below). With all the hype and buildup to his election I can't see how he can possibly live up to expectations.

     

    "The language of politics is poetry, not prose. Jackson is poetry. Cuomo is poetry. Dukakis is a word processor."

    (Richard Nixon on Meet the Press, 10 April 1988)

  10. I can't believe how this BORING news item has dragged on for months! Yes, it's important on a global scale, but they milked it to the extreme over here. When it comes to our own elections, we have nowhere near as much media coverage!

     

    May the best man win...and then shut up for four years.

     

     

    Amen to all that. You should see the tsunami of BS that we've been bombarded with over here. What a relief to see the end in sight.

  11. Very nice, Judy. Those are broad and picturesque uplands, with a splash of color. What is the name of the river and district? Do you live there or spend much time on the water?

     

    Allow me to offer a photo of my lazy cat 'Boots' which was taken in June. The muddy body of water behind him is actually a creek behind my home which jumped its banks after receiving six inches of rain one memorable evening. He couldn't have been less concerned with the state of affairs.

     

    boots.jpg

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.