Jump to content

clockwork angler

Members
  • Posts

    9
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by clockwork angler

  1. Sea Fisheries Committees are primarily funded buy a Levy from the Local county councils, ie ratepayers, SFC’s annual expenditure range from £500,000 to over £1,000,000 so as an angler paying council tax all these past years , part of the council tax has been funding sea fisheries committess, paying for the mis-management and decline of our own fishing ! That make's me angry , the commercials must be laughing there heads off. can I have a rebate ? Also , as there are county councillors who sit on the SFC's , I assume they are elected , when the next set of elections come round , perhaps a list of what they have done on the committess should be published and how angler freindly they are . clockwork (completley wound up)
  2. Isn't it best just to ignore threads that you don't want to follow? I agree with leon on this. I do wish our main sea angling press was more vocal on the restoration/conservation issues ( this does not include the sea angling news, Norm always prints resto/conservation bits) , its sad that I have to read the Fishing News to see any kind of debate.
  3. I normally fish the East Anglian coast , and I was thinking of having a change , any good winter beach/shore marks in Kent that anyone would recommend
  4. Hi wurzel I understand you net for Soles up on the East coast , out of interest , what kind of nets do you use, how much and how are they constructed ?
  5. Was there a consultation on the monofilament enabling byelaws ? I agree with Leon , this is a good time to read the BMP or to re-read it , there is a danger of "chinese whispers" being applied to the BMP
  6. Hi Wurzel Have you heard of a book called "The end of the Line " I think its by Charles Clover, excellent read, something read on windy days.
  7. regarding nomadic fish. A fish migration route can be a MPA . MPA's can be set up as a series of linked areas to take into account , MPA's don't have to be large tracks of the sea As for the over dramtising the grand banks , its funny how scientist spend all this time studying and conducting research etc , only to be told they don't know what they are talking about , what a waste of education !
  8. From the CBC (canada) archives http://archives.cbc.ca/IDD-1-73-1595/polit...my/cod_economy/ try playing some of the video clips , section 9, " to the last fish" gives a good overview Fished Out: The Rise and Fall of the Cod Fishery "While the 1992 and 2003 fishing moratoriums were seen as tough medicine, fishermen were told that the bans were necessary if the cod stocks were ever expected to recover. But more than a decade after the initial ban the Atlantic cod population continues its free fall. This CBC Television report looks at new scientific research that suggests decades of overfishing has adversely affected the cod's breeding cycle, leaving them permanently stunted as a result" "• In May 2003, former DFO scientist Ransom Myers made the cover of the journal Nature with his research into the effects of overfishing on the cod's breeding cycle and genetic structure. • His research argued that excessive offshore fishing practices had destroyed an entire adult generation of cod in the space of 15 years" "• As a result Myers said the species' breeding cycle was permanently disrupted, leaving the remaining cod to reproduce at a younger age and smaller size. • As Myers puts it in this clip, "we've cut the head of off the fishery." so stop trying to wind me up about theres no overfishing and blaming global warming From the WWF website http://www.wwf.org.uk/news/n_0000001871.asp Cod over-fished despite ban Tuesday 20 September 2005 Illegal fishing disguised as accidental catch of fish banned from commercial use is threatening to wipe out remaining cod stocks in the Grand Banks off Canada's east coast, warns a new report by WWF. "This report highlights a key issue and a vital lesson for European fisheries managers hoping for cod recovery in our waters," said Helen Davies, WWF-UK Fisheries Officer. "If this issue is not tackled soon in the EU cod recovery plan it could have a serious impact on and the UK's fishing economy, which is dependent upon cod." The Grand Banks fisheries, once home to one of the world's most abundant populations of cod, collapsed in the 1990s, leading to a total fishing moratorium for this species in 1994. However, the report shows that despite the ban, over 13,000 tonnes of cod and other fish, including American plaice and redfish, are taken every year as bycatch - the accidental capture of non-targeted fish. In 2003 alone, 5,400 tonnes of cod were caught as bycatch in the southern Grand Banks - about 90 per cent of the total population in that area and a 30-fold increase in bycatch since the fishery was closed. Fishermen usually throw overboard unwanted marine species but are allowed to keep a small percentage of commercially valuable fish caught accidentally, which can be sold for profit. This has led to massive abuse, as many vessels are purposefully operating in areas where fishing of species such as cod is banned but their accidental catch very likely to happen. The report shows that in some cases, bycatch can make up as much as 80 per cent of the landed catch, leading to huge profit increases. "When there is a fishing moratorium, most people believe that endangered fish stocks are protected, but this is not the case," said Dr. Robert Rangeley, Director of WWF-Canada's Atlantic Marine Programme. "The current level of cod bycatch clearly means that this species has little chance of recovery in the Grand Banks." The WWF report criticises the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization (NAFO) for mismanaging the fisheries under its control. It says that in eleven of these fisheries, where fishing is totally or partially banned because of depletion of their fish stocks, there are little signs of recovery, mainly because of the bycatch issue. WWF is calling on the Canadian government and other NAFO nations to immediately take measures that will reduce the bycatch of cod on the southern Grand Banks by 80 percent, protect sensitive habitats, such as corals, from fishing, and address overcapacity - too many boats chasing too few fish - which is a root cause for overfishing and bycatch. Canada has an added responsibility to ensure protection of species such as cod, as much of the Grand Banks waters lie solely within its jurisdiction. "We need to act swiftly in order to restore the awesome productivity of the Grand Banks region," said Dr. Simon Cripps, Director of WWF's Global Marine Programme. "If we continue to allow wasteful fisheries practices, fish stocks will never recover and coastal communities will continue to suffer. The government of Canada and NAFO fishing nations must act now in order to save our fisheries." But I suppose to some its only WWF scare mongering
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.