Jump to content

garden pond


zappagod

Recommended Posts

Thanks but i want to put some swan muscles in it too as it will be as natural as poss for wildlife with no fancy koi. so what do i put in the bottom of it some say washed sand and some say nothing and some say mud and some say compost THANKS ALL THE BEST ZAPP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no need to put anything on the bottom of your pond as in a small amount of time natural sediment will build up.

With natural style ponds, ie without artificial filtration or aeration it is essential to do everything slowly as it will take time for the ponds natural system to adjust to any outside changes ie stocking with fish or plants.

The most important thing is to keep the stocking of fish down to a manageable level.

'Oxygenating' weed is a little missleading as although any plantlife will oxygenate the water during the day using photosynthesis, at night plants along with all other aquatic life will use oxygen from the water, so back to my first point of everything in moderation and don't let the plants take over!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are no real problems with introducing swan mussels, in my experience they don't actually do a great deal in the way of cleaning or filtering the water or gunge on the bottom, but I am sure they will add to the natural feel of the pond. One last thing is to be careful buying them make sure the supplier is reputable and if there are any dead ones in the tank or empty shells, then buy elsewhere as they can carry a virus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would strongly advise against putting swan mussels in a garden pond. They have a habit of dying, and making the worst stink you can imagine.

 

p.s. I hate to be a killjoy Poledark, but I've just had a look at your photo and it has reminded me of a recent court case in my area. A couple had bought some land off a farmer to extend their garden, and those wonderful guardians of the countryside in the planning department, made them rip out all their hard work and restore it to barren agricultural land. The fact that they had improved what had been an eyesore was deemed irrelevant.

 

[ 08. January 2003, 06:54 PM: Message edited by: Peter Sharpe ]

English as tuppence, changing yet changeless as canal water, nestling in green nowhere, armoured and effete, bold flag-bearer, lotus-fed Miss Havishambling, opsimath and eremite, feudal, still reactionary, Rawlinson End.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.