Jump to content

whoops accidently got caught yet again

barry luxton

By barry luxton
in Conservation & Politics

 Share

Recommended Posts

barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted

sorry m'laude. :bleh: only a small amount this time, so not too bad. :)

 

http://www.fishupdate.com/news/fullstory.php/aid/18870/Fishing_vessel_master_and_owner_fined_for_exceeding_catch_limit_for_cod.html

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Leon Roskilly Member

Leon Roskilly

Posted
Posted (edited)

Hmmm!

 

He's an MMO appointee to Sussex IFCA

 

see:

http://www.sussex-ifca.gov.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=117&Itemid=202



 

Any appointee found to have be convicted for an offence under fisheries or environmental legislation, or any other matter relevant to their appointment to an IFCA, will have their appointment terminated, and will not be eligible for re-appointment.

http://www.marinemanagement.org.uk/about/ifcas/documents/ifca_terms.pdf

Yet he has been convicted in the past!

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/southern_counties/5128754.stm

Edited by Leon Roskilly
  • Like 1

RNLI Shoreline Member

Member of the Angling Trust

Link to comment
Share on other sites
seafoods Member

seafoods

Posted
Posted

 

Or someone with the same name is, you never know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Leon Roskilly Member

Leon Roskilly

Posted
Posted
Or someone with the same name is, you never know.

 

And looks the same ?

 

(Committee members link above has pictures, as does story of earlier conviction.

 

Do a google search of 'Paul Joy Kaya' and again plenty of news stories with picture of the same person (or dopple-ganger)).

 

Actually I've met Paul quite a few times, he puts in a lot of effort for the fishermen of Hastings, high-lighting the difficulties of working with existing quotas.

RNLI Shoreline Member

Member of the Angling Trust

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Or someone with the same name is, you never know.

it's the same guy. That time he tried to play the system and lost. He thought he had imunity from quota.

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
seafoods Member

seafoods

Posted
Posted
And looks the same ?

 

(Committee members link above has pictures, as does story of earlier conviction.

 

Do a google search of 'Paul Joy Kaya' and again plenty of news stories with picture of the same person (or dopple-ganger)).

 

Actually I've met Paul quite a few times, he puts in a lot of effort for the fishermen of Hastings, high-lighting the difficulties of working with existing quotas.

So turn him in then Leon, maybe get somebody you would prefer on the committee instead. Otherwise why mention that he's an appointee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.

  I accept