Benefits to Anglers Unclear

[Leon Roskilly]

Replying to an SACN letter to Ben Bradshaw regarding the bass mls decision, DEFRA have said that

 

The benefits to anglers (in particular to shore anglers, who make up over 50% of angling groups) were not clear and there would have been a substantial cost to the fishing industry.

 

see: http://www.sacn.org.uk/Conservation-and-Po...rs_Unclear.html

[Guest challenge]

Replying to an SACN letter to Ben Bradshaw regarding the bass mls decision, DEFRA have said that

see: http://www.sacn.org.uk/Conservation-and-Po...rs_Unclear.html

Hello Leon.

I see that the NFFO seam to be doing quite a lot on this decision. Getting a fighting fund organised with a very determined campaign to get this decision overturned. Lobbying mps etc.

SACN writing to ken bradontheseashore is about as effective as saying ok mate.

[Leon Roskilly]

Hello Leon.

I see that the NFFO seam to be doing quite a lot on this decision. Getting a fighting fund organised with a very determined campaign to get this decision overturned. Lobbying mps etc.

SACN writing to ken bradontheseashore is about as effective as saying ok mate.

 

 

You might very well be right Challenge.

 

 

A few moans and a bit of dummy spitting, then we accept whatever we are given.

 

Just moaning a bit harder to each other on the forums and the beaches.

 

 

At the end of the day we are dealt with as we are found to be.

 

 

Now if only we could get 10,000 anglers down to Smith Square, or drown DEFRA in emails and letters!

[sam-cox]

Now if only we could get 10,000 anglers down to Smith Square, or drown DEFRA in emails and letters!

 

Im up for a march if thats what you are driving at Leon, but it would have to have a clear objective, .