Jump to content

Longlining for Cod

Ian Burrett

By Ian Burrett
in Conservation & Politics

 Share

Recommended Posts

barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted
I have no take on gill tagging of you know what, simply because I don’t know what you are talking about.

Please explain or post a link and then I will respond.

Regards

 

I do apologise for not making myself clear, hope this helps, cheers.

 

 

http://www.sacn.org.uk/Opinion/Bass_Carcass_Tagging.html

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Guest challenge

Guest challenge

Posted
Posted
I do apologise for not making myself clear, hope this helps, cheers.

http://www.sacn.org.uk/Opinion/Bass_Carcass_Tagging.html

Sounds ok to me Barry. Could be a problem with the removal of the tag just before you prepare it for the plate?

We have problems with large amounts of undersize lobsters going ashore each year. You don’t need a tag to show that they are illegal.

Still the man who is supplying fish illegal isn’t going to bother with bag limits anyway.

Regards and thanks for the information. Have a college at work that does a lot of work in the bass fishery, will have a word with him and get his outlook on the matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Leon Roskilly Member

Leon Roskilly

Posted
Posted
Could be a problem with the removal of the tag just before you prepare it for the plate?

 

http://www.linecaught.org.uk/tags.htm

 

 

ta03.jpg

 

 

Gill tags are already catching on as a marketing tool in some fisheries.

 

 

http://www.linecaught.org.uk/03.htm

RNLI Shoreline Member

Member of the Angling Trust

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kev. J Junior Member

Kev. J

Posted
Posted
http://www.linecaught.org.uk/tags.htm

ta03.jpg

Gill tags are already catching on as a marketing tool in some fisheries.

http://www.linecaught.org.uk/03.htm

Taken from the "Bass" page on the web-site;

"Fishermen in Cornwall and South Wales have a bigger Minimum Landing Size (MLS) than the rest of the UK meaning that at least the male fish caught off Cornwall are larger and have had more chance to reproduce".

 

At 37 and a half centimetres,that's simply not true,surely?

 

Kev.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted (edited)
Sounds ok to me Barry. Could be a problem with the removal of the tag just before you prepare it for the plate?

We have problems with large amounts of undersize lobsters going ashore each year. You don’t need a tag to show that they are illegal.

 

Just like tagging, why can't lobsters have numbered, lettered, bands on them. Accountability back to the guy who landed it. To be removed by the end user. i.e. the person who buys it from the fish monger or removed proir to cooking at the resturant. That would make any lobster without a numbered band to be confiscated full stop. Any one who is in recept of unnumbered lobsters to be charged with handling of stolen property.

 

As the hobby potter has only the right to two per day, any one in recipt of unbanded lobsters over that amount is a thief and treat them so.

 

Appears too easy .

 

The tagged bass in the photo, even i would pay to eat that one, if i don't fish for them that is. Bet those line caught tagged bass fetch a decent amount of dosh in the shops.

Edited by barry luxton

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.

  I accept