Jump to content

radical plan for improving sea fish stocks


john frum

Recommended Posts

Here's one I've though about for ages. maybe it's come up before, if so, apologies.

 

Reefs = fish. Wrecks = fish.

 

Anyome who has watched the magnificent "Blue Planet" TV series must have been impressed by the images of a deserted stretch of ocean suddenly punctuated by teeming fish and invertebrate life wherever some floating or sunken debris (aka "pollution") occurs.

 

Now I've seen it suggested by serious scientific commentators that the impact of pollution caused by oil is in fact nothing like as severe as has been generally assumed, at least in the medium to long term. The sea and its organisms have a capacity to digest even major spills relatively quickly (and of course it goes without saying they're a Very Bad Thing, and to be deplored and avoided.)

 

Here's my suggestion. Build lots of artificial reefs by dumping old ships (currently being cut up in Bangladesh with ensuing massive amounts of mess) and motor vehicles (ditto everywhere) in suitable marine locations: now nobody's going to be trawling there for a while... Obviously it'd be a good idea to remove any oil etc that can be removed without difficulty, but don't worry too much about minor short term pollution as the overall benefits massively outweigh this. Calculations of cost/benefit come into most issues. Legislating for commercial fishing controls is fraught with problems and this "solution" would be too but maybe it's be worth lobbying for. I think there would be some scientific support for the cost/benefit calculation.

 

What do the members of this forum think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest conger tamer

I still dont understand why they dont fix tyres together and make reefs around the uk after all they keep moaning about how many there are and how hard they are to dispose of?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest NickInTheNorth

as far as I know if it's on the sea bed no one owns it so who is to say it's for diving only? And I may be wrong about that, feel free to tell me if I'm talking b0110cks, I often do.

 

Mind you finding it without divers on and therefore safe to fish would peobably be a bitdifficult.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest conger tamer

ps

its only in 60ft 400m off shore ex naval ship scyla

 

[ 02. July 2005, 07:50 PM: Message edited by: conger tamer ]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.