Jump to content

Christchurch Harbour catch and release

slitshot

By slitshot
in Sea Fishing

 Share

Recommended Posts

barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted (edited)
Catch and release was not the death kneel for Coarse fishing as far as I know,and certain Coarse fish were originaly bred for the table .Christchurch Harbour does not work for me because of the barrage of nets fish have to swim though at the entrance to Chritchurch Harbour and when They leave pray to anyone with a net. But in a Ideal world would you rather catch 10 Bass and return them or one now and again. What I,m really asking is it sport or the pot ?

 

It was brought in on the premis of illegal angling, yer right.

 

Tell me what is the logic c&r when you have made reference to a barrage of nets. In the grand scheme of things i could liken c&r with 'p' ing in the wind while trying to put out an oil refinery fire.

 

Many thousands of mullet use Weymouth harbour, unrestricted and you can take them home if you feel the need, for free.

Edited by barry luxton

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.

  I accept