Jump to content

satisfactory level of complience


Recommended Posts

all very well organising legislation to protect the stock, how about this one then, being bounced to and fro as to who's responsible, this one has been going on for 3 years apparently. Whats gonna happen with regards to mcz's for example. A load of bl@@dy rubbish, legislation that ain't worth the paper it's written on.

 

http://www.fishnewseu.com/index.php?option...h&Itemid=54

 

Community councillor Ian McConchie told the BBC that: "Gangs of illegal cocklers are coming down and raiding the cockle beds in the bay and this has been going on for approximately three years.

Edited by barry luxton

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

all very well organising legislation to protect the stock, how about this one then, being bounced to and fro as to who's responsible, this one has been going on for 3 years apparently. Whats gonna happen with regards to mcz's for example. A load of bl@@dy rubbish, legislation that ain't worth the paper it's written on.

 

http://www.fishnewseu.com/index.php?option...h&Itemid=54

 

Community councillor Ian McConchie told the BBC that: "Gangs of illegal cocklers are coming down and raiding the cockle beds in the bay and this has been going on for approximately three years.

 

But according to you on another site these gangs like the bait digging mob are the figment of a sick imagination.

Publication2_zpsthmtka6c.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But according to you on another site these gangs like the bait digging mob are the figment of a sick imagination.

 

Get it right sport, you have invented eastern europeon, cash in hand geezers and tom cobbley digging bait, don't know if you managed to mention gangs from china as well, yet you offer up no evidence what so ever to support your assumptions that you dreamed up. There is a huge difference between fact and fiction and i know just what you are expert in sport, facts please. Provide us also all the figment imagination payments made by the tackle shops you have claimed, or get off the pot. Hot air guesstimates or facts? You even claimed you went to one area to 'check it out'. Well, whats it to be then officer?

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Get it right sport, you have invented eastern europeon, cash in hand geezers and tom cobbley digging bait, don't know if you managed to mention gangs from china as well, yet you offer up no evidence what so ever to support your assumptions that you dreamed up. There is a huge difference between fact and fiction and i know just what you are expert in sport, facts please. Provide us also all the figment imagination payments made by the tackle shops you have claimed, or get off the pot. Hot air guesstimates or facts? You even claimed you went to one area to 'check it out'. Well, whats it to be then officer?

 

North Western IFCA issued 400 permits for cockle pickers 2011 season and on day one 650 turned up mostly eastern Europeans and that came from the lips of the NW IFCA CFO and it resulted in an emergency bye law being made.

 

Where exactly have I accused any shop of cash in hand dealings Mr Luxton? Fact is I haven’t however we know it goes on and using the shops as a means of regulation would go some way to stopping the known black market, got a better idea have you?

 

I visited one of three Solent commercial bait diggers that I have known well for many years. I did so to get the facts first hand and I will share that with information with those who I know will respect it.

Publication2_zpsthmtka6c.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you clearly have short memory loss,here you spouted off the other day about all the illegal activity. Rallying your troups, what you did on this occasion was to wind them up. Put up the evidence to back up your claim shotter. A bloke in your position having the authority to effect legislation needs evidence to make any new bylaw credible as opposed to having one drawn up on a whim because it looks good on paper. Show us this huge impact then.

 

Quote You: Why you might ask well there are gangs of pro diggers and crab gathers, most work for cash in hand and some of their effort is having a huge impact. Why not have your say on this subject on what is a very big challenge to the new IFCA authorities.

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

you clearly have short memory loss,here you spouted off the other day about all the illegal activity. Rallying your troups, what you did on this occasion was to wind them up. Put up the evidence to back up your claim shotter. A bloke in your position having the authority to effect legislation needs evidence to make any new bylaw credible as opposed to having one drawn up on a whim because it looks good on paper. Show us this huge impact then.

 

Quote You: Why you might ask well there are gangs of pro diggers and crab gathers, most work for cash in hand and some of their effort is having a huge impact. Why not have your say on this subject on what is a very big challenge to the new IFCA authorities.

 

You are the champion at taking things out of context so you are so let’s first go back to where this started. The Angling Trust announced that they had been invited to take part in talks with the Southern IFCA byelaw working group and to help with ‘Bait Digging’ now what these groups recommend to the committee will be the basis on which the new or reviewed byelaws will be drawn, so obviously very important and a feather in the cap of the Trust. Setting aside how that all happened as that has not been discussed Peter Jennings asked me what would I do about the ‘Bait Digging gangs working in Poole Harbour’ My first response was to ask was there a problem?

 

The thing is other areas are talking about this and there are some serious problems in both the north east and north west. There have also been some attempts to stop bait digging in Fareham Creek which is a part of the Solent so before I said anything I found out what I could. Then offered a suggestion to PJ which is all it was and you have jumped all over it like you do and I’m the one who is supposed to be dangerous.

 

There are problems in the bait digging world with legit diggers suffering as a result of the gangs that supply bait that is simply black market bait changing hands for cash no accounts, no tax paid and a huge impact on the stock where ever they work. (See Eastern IFCA Northumberland IFCA and North West IFCA) Bit like the black market trade in Bass that the Southern IFCA has so far failed to sort out.

 

You have rightly said this requires legislating so how would you do it and I suspect you might find that harder than slagging off folk who try.

Publication2_zpsthmtka6c.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No you are swerving again, you clearly stated that there is a problem with illegal digging, you offer up no evidence to that fact that you have stated, you told others on the recreational facebook page's that you will go to hampshire to access the serious situation as you have made out and report back, subsequently you confirm that you have met just one bait digger, with no reporting back as usual. I not slagging you off, i'm asking you to quantify your comments that there is a problem according to you, yet you cannot back it up. In addition you made the claim that tackle shops are 'in' on this conspiricy, offer the facts or get off the pot.

 

This quote from you on a facebook page clearly shows that at that time you don't know what the situation re baith digging, you also point out that you will make it your business to find out.

At the same time you claim that there is a serious issue with illegal bait diggers. What is it going to be, you are aware or not? How serious or not is it, evidence? Is it out of hand? how many people did you speak to, according to you it was one.

 

 

Quote you:

 

My suspicion is the bait digging issues are about Poole Harbour and more importantly Gosport, well I’m off to Gosport next week to find out what the situation is as I have no idea how things are at present. We all know how this has been argued about for a long time and if there is evidence that things are out of hand then guess what I will personally support action just as I did over the illegal Bass fishing in Langston, further more I will ask the members of RSA-UK to support it to. What I will oppose however will be any restriction on local anglers digging bait other than say for a daily quota but closed areas or the need for permits, which is not and never will be up for negotiation. Again that is a personal view and not official RSA-UK policy given the matter has never been aired.

Edited by barry luxton

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No you are swerving again, you clearly stated that there is a problem with illegal digging, you offer up no evidence to that fact that you have stated, you told others on the recreational facebook page's that you will go to hampshire to access the serious situation as you have made out and report back, subsequently you confirm that you have met just one bait digger, with no reporting back as usual. I not slagging you off, i'm asking you to quantify your comments that there is a problem according to you, yet you cannot back it up. In addition you made the claim that tackle shops are 'in' on this conspiricy, offer the facts or get off the pot.

 

This quote from you on a facebook page clearly shows that at that time you don't know what the situation re baith digging, you also point out that you will make it your business to find out.

At the same time you claim that there is a serious issue with illegal bait diggers. What is it going to be, you are aware or not? How serious or not is it, evidence? Is it out of hand? how many people did you speak to, according to you it was one.

 

 

Quote you:

 

My suspicion is the bait digging issues are about Poole Harbour and more importantly Gosport, well I’m off to Gosport next week to find out what the situation is as I have no idea how things are at present. We all know how this has been argued about for a long time and if there is evidence that things are out of hand then guess what I will personally support action just as I did over the illegal Bass fishing in Langston, further more I will ask the members of RSA-UK to support it to. What I will oppose however will be any restriction on local anglers digging bait other than say for a daily quota but closed areas or the need for permits, which is not and never will be up for negotiation. Again that is a personal view and not official RSA-UK policy given the matter has never been aired.

 

 

There are known bait digging problems around the country Barry The EA are looking at it as are the IFCAS

 

In the North West the problem is mainly cockle collection but as the new emergency restrictions bite so the effort moves to bait collection at least that is what the CEO has told me personally. In Northumbria the deputy chair of their IFCA has said there are some serious problems both in impact on the stock but also some disputes resulting in violence and he has told me he is aware that they have the same problem in parts of the North Eastern IFCA area.

 

In the Southern District PJ has said there is a problem in Poole Harbour as for the Solent there a professional digger who supplies many shops in the south and south west and he has a dozen diggers to supply his customers. He told me gangs do show up on occasions and hammer an area for a few days which hits the stock in those areas. Fortunately as far as he is concerned the Solent is made up from a huge number of different grounds and the ones the gangs hit are probably going to affect the hobby anglers who dig their own bait more than it will affect him, however it is worrying because the gangs seem to be turning up more often and he pointed out that this bait must be going somewhere.

 

If you look on Peter’s page that is what I told them and one would expect this to be true given the interest in the debate and the fact that the trust has got involved. Sorting out how to regulate this is not going to be easy either issuing a licence is one option but policing that would be a nightmare as it is imposable to prevent Joe public free access to the resource. Making shops account where they get their bait may help if licencing is introduced but there will still be the question of regulating the effort on the stock. What is generally agreed is that the problem has arisen because anglers are believed to have shunned farmed bait to such an extent that most shops now refuse to stock something they can’t sell so it is obvious that some are using black bait to overcome that.

Edited by Bob Shotter
Publication2_zpsthmtka6c.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote you: If you look on Peter’s page that is what I told them and one would expect this to be true given the interest in the debate and the fact that the trust has got involved. Sorting out how to regulate this is not going to be easy either issuing a licence is one option but policing that would be a nightmare as it is imposable to prevent Joe public free access to the resource. Making shops account where they get their bait may help if licencing is introduced but there will still be the question of regulating the effort on the stock. What is generally agreed is that the problem has arisen because anglers are believed to have shunned farmed bait to such an extent that most shops now refuse to stock something they can’t sell so it is obvious that some are using black bait to overcome that.

 

absolutly 100% assumption, guesstimate's, possibles, hearsay and pub talk. Absolutly no evidence, facts what so ever that this problem exists and you are advocating licences legislation on tackle shops etc etc. Yet when licences are mentioned re anglers you advocate the reason why not. You have spoken to one commercial bait digger and on his hearsay you have worked all this out for yourself.

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote you: If you look on Peter’s page that is what I told them and one would expect this to be true given the interest in the debate and the fact that the trust has got involved. Sorting out how to regulate this is not going to be easy either issuing a licence is one option but policing that would be a nightmare as it is imposable to prevent Joe public free access to the resource. Making shops account where they get their bait may help if licencing is introduced but there will still be the question of regulating the effort on the stock. What is generally agreed is that the problem has arisen because anglers are believed to have shunned farmed bait to such an extent that most shops now refuse to stock something they can’t sell so it is obvious that some are using black bait to overcome that.

 

absolutly 100% assumption, guesstimate's, possibles, hearsay and pub talk. Absolutly no evidence, facts what so ever that this problem exists and you are advocating licences legislation on tackle shops etc etc. Yet when licences are mentioned re anglers you advocate the reason why not. You have spoken to one commercial bait digger and on his hearsay you have worked all this out for yourself.

 

If you are not prepared to take the word of IFCA officers or IFCA members or the reports the IFCAs produce then I see little point in discussing anything with you Barry.

 

Before closing the door however I would say ‘one’ at what point have I suggested regulating sea anglers right to dig or collect their own bait, fact is I haven’t. ‘Two’ this was a question asking “what would I do” not what I ‘am going to do, if the Cornwall IFCA debate this with a view to regulation I will enter the debate with an open mind and vote on the evidence, fact is we are not about to do that so any view posted is my own personal view based on what I know at present.

 

If anyone is drawing assumptions here then dare I say that has to be you and yet again you avoid any question like what would you do? I turn it around simply to see if you have any good ideas of your own because believe it or not as stated above I have an open mind and please note I have no wish to try and pee higher than you or appear to be better than you or anyone else in any way.

Edited by Bob Shotter
Publication2_zpsthmtka6c.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.