more musings

[chesters1]

1)if the government wanted to protect the army why dont they issue full body armour to our troops (anyone that saw that shootout in america with fully armoured villains using high powered arms with teflon coated bullets agains the police ,the police had to borrow weapons to deal with them )

2) in star wars etc the troopers have full armour but it is useless agains anything (1 shot and the trooper is down) so why issue it?

3)agincourt was our biggest victory using bows and arrows but during the battle they became obselete almost overnight why???

5)why is that wednesday slot in parliament called pm`s question time ,when in fact he doesn`t answer anything just throwing the question back at the asker ,should it be called p.m`s evasion time?

6)if these new detention "houses" are built with their onsite medical facilities etc could the villagers around the site use them.

7)why in this modern day p.c world is the queens job always given to a woman?

[phonebush]

The dreaded crossbow.

 

Chesters1, because, if we ended crime we would suffer a great economic depression. Crime, preventing crime, trials of conspirtors, prisions, post prision management etc etc. HUGE industry. Remember 8% of the worlds GWP is stolen or produced illegally.

Phone

What would the government do?

 

[ 15 May 2002, 08:53 PM: Message edited by: phonebush ]

[chesters1]

nah it was the gun ,some french dude let one off in the battle (the first time in a battle in history) wether he hit anyone is unknown