Jump to content

smudger

Members
  • Posts

    145
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by smudger

  1. Would up your braid strength 14lb is not enough to go chucking 50grm lure around on maybe 35lb Water clarity, wouldn't worry to much about it to much if pike are around they will have a go at a lure vibration plays a big part in lure fishing you will/can catch in very coloured water
  2. Yes and heres a good example of pal review and confirmation bias “… Kevin [Trenberth] and I will keep them out somehow – even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is!” – Phil Jones 8/7/2004
  3. Would think the police are there to back up the bailiffs if the bailiffs are EA (happens on the Thames alot) for the bailiffs protection, otherwise???may be the water owner might have asked for them to be present whilst licence checks go on??
  4. Resigned because it was peer reviewed not pal reviewed, by the small cliche of climate scienctists that review each other papers As for sceince not being very well paid???Copy and Pasted from wuwt Heres jim Hansen and Gavin Schmidt pay rates for 2010 Hansen is ES 00 and made $158,832 in FY 2010. Gavin Schmidt is GS 15 and made $136,791 in FY 2010. Plus Hansens side earning include this Public financial disclosures and other documents reveal that he has received at least $1.2 million in the past four years, more than doubling his taxpayer-financed salary. nice if you can get it
  5. good post Chesters1, I am with the cyclic thought too.
  6. So it ok for warmist's to call sceptics names but not vice versa,very child like and unscience like. And you can tell from less than half a dozen posts that i am uneducated,seems you are the one with their fingers in their ears, you've not adressed one question i've put to you yet.you come across like the climate scientists Mann, Trenberth,Jones etc i know best mentality,see i can do the ad hom attack as well.As for my sceptical outlook well lets just say you've more than reinforced it with your petty reply i won't waste my time replying to you anymore, key board know it alls get very boring after a short time
  7. What about the term "denier" with all it connotations thrown at sceptical person's,do you expect people to suit back and take it lying down.Ever seen the 10.10 video...bit more than a ad hominen wouldn't you say.
  8. Huba Huba. talking of being eaten alive,her bikini bottom is suffering a delightfull fate by the look of that picture
  9. Ah, so the graphs from Goddards blog could be right, and just because he allows some one to write a logical fallacy he's wrong, not to be trusted. You've commented that you're more inclined to trust CSL site, what was your conclusion on the sea level data provided by them Rising or falling Is it true that cows are from the same evolutionary familie as whales??
  10. So you are just an ordinary Joe Public,no academic/scientific background.
  11. be carefull on what part of the beach you venture on to, theres a nudist part to budleigh beach with goings-on that can't be mentioned on here in one particular part of it
  12. good on yer,a well run day out,good luck
  13. as far as i can tell he's he person, do they have to have a bio or cv and you're academic, you tell me if he's right in what he's posted (graph wise)
  14. http://oceanservice.noaa.gov/education/kit...5currents1.html
  15. http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2011/06...vel/#more-32692 http://sealevel.colorado.edu/
  16. would take any from the IPCC with a large pinch of salt, beside's sea levels have falling the last couple of years
  17. I go on forums where saying such a thing would get you hung......heretic It is now widely accepted that NAD would/might still influence the Uk if the sinking to the north of the denser cold water stopped, as the NAD is mostly wind driven and the Coriolis Effect (Earths Rotation) would still push the warmer water west/north west
  18. Seems as if people have different opinions of unhooking mats.I have made my postion clear of how i feel and won't be passing any more comment on it, good luck and good fishing to all.
  19. Its impossible to not remove any slime from a fish, unless you unhook in the water,which as you should know is not alway practical or posible depending on the venue fished, high banks etc. My local canal has low banks where i can unhook in the water and do not need a mat or a landing net, It also has high banks where i can not get easy acces to the fish, so i use a landing net and mat.Plus my Association states i have to carry a mat and other rules for pike fishing be it deadbaiting or on the lure, it is not my wish to have to appear in front of the commitee or be labelled a uncaring lure/pike angler, we have enough problems with EEs taking fish for the pot(not just pike) i do not wish to add to a declining pike population by returning fish covered in dirt etc so i try to my bit, not just for me but for future generations of anglers......others it seems are somewhat more self centered.
  20. I understand that all waters are not under the control of clubs,i also understand that some, if not all (i stand to be corrected )the lake district lakes and some tarns are free fishing, seeing that you state you fish "some " of these lake and tarns i took it you fished for free, as you do not belong to any clubs or Associations had you pointed this out we could avoided most of the posts we've posted, i've never argued that its laws to carry a unhooking mat,only if and if you belonged to a club/association than more often than not you have to have a unhooking mat.The EA licence has local byelaws and national byelaws which should also be adhered to. The 'future generations and welfare of fish' is a melodramatic statement, for you havn't brought any evidence to show my practice is harmful to fish. I know for certain the past generations treated their fish in a wholly different way to the way we do now. By calling the "future generations and welfare of fish" statement melodramatic i think that is enough evidence.That is the reason rules and regulations were put in place by club/associations,and the EA do you think the pike population would still be in the state it is today if killed every pike we all caught like they did in the 60s 70s,that why gaffs were outlawed and gags are frowned upon now.You seem to building your case on the fact that you do not want to carry a unhooking mat,just because you find it inconvienant whilst shore fishing (unless static deadbaiting)if you think you should for deadbaiting, why not for stalking/lure fishing form the shore, fishing for the same fish, different method, your argument is some what flawed wouldn't you say?? "I always carry a priest, believeing, and experience has shown it the only humane way to proceed" Could you elaborate on the above statement, are you now saying that you dispatch every pike caught??why carry a priest? Child no, 46
  21. hang on aminute your saying this Your statement 'come under the EA's governance' just shows that you have failed to take the time to find out just what the EA's function is in regard to all the country's waters. then the next you come out with this 'im saying that there are aspects of the management of ALL waters which the EA are responsible for. i am lost, and i do not i am wrong, that is what the debate is about, trouble is your flip floping around so much you seem to forgot what you've posted..or am i wrong about that as well you fish free waters not owned by club/'Angling association's............. lucky you Do you think you owe to future generations of anglers to look after the welfare of fish could go on for a fair while like this
  22. So are you saying that the EA has no jurisdiction or control over any thing to with the fishing in waters that you fish? And sorry when i say clubs that also includes Angling Associations
  23. No i am not implying that its compulsory under EA regulations, i am implying that under most clubs its more often than not compulsory.
  24. No, i am not here to wind any one up, And yes i have seen the EA licence, this years one has a Perch on it, last years one had a Barbel the year before was also a Perch.Are trying imply that i fish illegally Some one must own the waters you fish?????if not own/run by a club they more than likely come under the EA's governace Perhaps you have not aqainted yourself with the fisheries rules or maybe never gave a thought that they might actaully have some! As for comment of the Enfield character...oh very droll,
  25. Phone my apologies,i took it that the "steward" remark was a jibe.as for mat will have to agree to disagree. fish well and in peace
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.