Jump to content

steve pitts

Members
  • Posts

    274
  • Joined

  • Last visited

steve pitts's Achievements

Member

Member (3/3)

0

Reputation

  1. I've just returned from 10 days on Cape Cod Steve Several sections of local beaches above the HW mark were subject to restrictions / no entry to people and dogs due to nesting terns. The signs were 'by order' of the local council, but also had the Massechusetts Audubon Society logo on them. My guess is that the Audubon Soc apply for 'protection' and when granted, they put up the info. signs, which were very informative with ID of the birds and nesting habits etc. These areas were not a loss to our fishing though, as access was still available to the water and there were dates on the signs indicating that the closures were only during the nesting season. Further around the Cape much of the coast is part of the National Shoreline natural reserve. There are no angling restrictions, but you do need a permit to drive onto the beach in most parts and there are no-go areas for ORVs. 3 brit visitors, who I'm sure you'll know of, had over 120 stripers (mostly well into double figure fish) off the beach in one day on lures from this area. Cheers Steve
  2. Sometimes the preditors do have an unfair advantage
  3. I think that most people would agree that the striped and grey mullet are similar in many respects and offer a reasonable substitute for our lack of knowledge on greys and in the abscence of any major tagging studies on greys having been undertaken here in UK. My view isn't that the cause of the decline is linked to something happening only outside of CH. The taking of mullet in nets outside and by snagging and some illegal netting inside the harbour may all be contributing factors. I get the feeling that mullet are being targetted as a food source more than they used to be, especially with the influences of Oriental cuisine and Hugh F-W crowing about what a sustainable resource mullet are. My own experience with open-coast thick-lipped mullet over the past 25 odd years is that the bigger fish that we used to experience (several 5-6lb fish with the odd 7 or 8lb fish in a 3 hour session) are not as prolific and the overall numbers of fish are certainly down, but experiences do vary from year to year. There now is undoubtedly more gill netting being deployed along the Dorset coastline that I fish and many mullet are taken over spring tides when they come very close inshore. On the subject of C&R of mullet, I would say that the mullet that we catch on fly gear recover and swim away just as strongly as the bass and wrasse that we catch in the same locations on lures with no evidence of any fatalities. Steve
  4. Sorry Steve - I thought your questions were - 1. 'What is the mortality rate of mullet that are caught and released?' 2. 'Have there been any tagging studies done which may indicate mortality rates of C&R'd Mullet? If so, who has done it and what were the results?' I thought that these questions had been answered in my posts. Who knows? - but here's a few thoughts. A common theme from the results of mullet tagging studies, that I have been able to find info on, indicate that mullet favour specific locations (already known to mullet anglers and commercial fishermen) and they appear not to venture very far (20 miles seems like a long way for most mullet?) from these locations. This could make local populations highly susceptible to depletion through overfishing, over-exploitation, climate variation or whatever reason anyone wishes to attach to a reduction in numbers. WRT Christchurch Harbour, there is certainly netting conducted outside of the harbour, were presumably the mullet must venture from time to time and rod and line snagging (using a lead and several treble hooks with a rod and line) for mullet has gone on inside for donkey's years, despite the watchfull eyes of the EA (protection of salmonids) and club bailiffs. Perhaps the 'official' <10% figure for angler retention is the tip of the iceberg and the removal of resident mullet from within and around Christchurch harbour is actually at a greater level which is proving borderline in terms of what the local mullet can sustain. I can't point you to the hard evidence that this is the true picture, but to my mind there's a posibility that (if there is a decline) more 'resident' fish are being removed than are being replaced by natural processes. Now there's a familiar scenario. Cheers Steve
  5. The Striped Mullet (Mugil cephalus) is not exactly the same as the thin and thin lipped grey mullet (Chelon labrosus and Liza ramada) but they look pretty similar and have the same habits e.g. frequent shallow inshore and estuarine habitats etc. It could be that the striped mullet's grow fast, die young lifestyle is down to the warmer waters around Florida, Texas and the Carolinas that it inhabits. I think that, a bit like bass, grey mullet around the UK are pretty much at the northern limit of their range and if the growth rates of mullet from say, the Med, were compared to 'UK' mullet, the Med mullet would grow faster and mature earlier / live shorter lives etc. Growth rates apart, the striped mullet studies appear to indicate a high survival rate for tagged fish, however they were caught - net or hook and line. 15,000 fish would be easier to catch in bulk with nets and I would have thought that this method of capture would be more likely to dislodge scales and protective mucus as C&R by anglers. Another striped mullet tagging study was conducted by the Marine Laboratory of the University of Miami on behalf of the Florida State Board of Conservation. A total of 1,050 tagged fish were released the first year. The total recovery of tags was 26.5 percent, and the maximum recovery for one location was 50 percent. Most tagged mullet were recaptured within comparatively short distances from the place of tagging, 89.8 percent having travelled not more than 20 miles. The longest migration was 150 miles. In another Florida-based mullet tagging study, there were 2,779 recoveries from 12,647 tagged mullet revealed that 91% were recovered with- in 32 km of the release point. The NMC carried out some mullet tagging (with MAFF approval) in the late 80's and 90's but the numbers of fish tagged were relatively few and the sample of returns was difficult to interpret. However, most recaptures were very close to the tagging / release sites, even when recaptured the following year. Mullet appear to be fairly sedentary. Once they've found their ideal location, they don't stray too far, so localised populations may be at risk of depletion, especially as here in the Uk they are slow growing, late maturing and form tightly-packed shoals inshore at times. Cheers Steve
  6. Hi Steve As I understand it - very little is known about mullet, compared to other species. I did a quick Google and came up with a tagging study conducted on striped mullet mortality where 15,000 fish were tagged in N. Carolina between 1997 and 2001. http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=16659073 The study résumé, which appeared in the North American journal of fisheries management, contains the following - Concomitant holding tank experiments suggested that tag retention and post-tagging survival, two central assumptions of the tag return model, were extremely high for adult striped mullet. Cheers Steve
  7. I remember making my first pilgrimage down to fish the Royalty and Christchurch Harbour when I was 15 or 16 (which is 40 years ago). The Hants Avon and The Dorset Stour, which converge at Christchurch, were nationally famous back then and anglers (freshwater) used to travel from one end of the country to the other for the variety and quality of species. You had to buy a day ticket (around £3 if I remember) to fish the Christchurch waters from Davis's tackle shop back then and nothing has changed in this respect, although the under 12's can now fish for 'free' to encourage take-up of angling by youngsters. Getting your day ticket at Davis's, a couple of pints of maggots, a few new Avon floats and staring at the photos of record-sized fish posted all around the walls was all part of the ritual. Of course, not everyone bought a permit and you would often see the bailiff in his patrol boat asking anglers to pack up and leave. The term 'illegal fishing' probably refers to those who do not buy a day ticket, or who fish without an EA rod licence i.e. they are not fishing legally. I continued to fish from Christchurch town pool (as in Leon's photo) all the way down to Mudeford Quay over the next 25 years from a variety of hired punts, small inflatables and GRP dingies, so I know the area quite well, although I haven't fished the harbour since the mid 90's when the fishing was already showing signs of deterioration, especially for the big roach that we used to catch in the Stour. We also used to catch lots of big thick lipped mullet, 40 - 50 thin lips in a session and some surprisingly good bass on the baited spinners, whilst we were fishing for the thin lips. So, IMO, If the Ringwood & District AA, who have run this water for decades, consider that these new rules, including C&R, are how best to manage the fishery, then that's fine by me and it wouldn't deter me from renewing my aquaintance with Christchurch Harbour sometime in the future, in fact it might just temp me back. Cheers Steve BTW Barry There are thin lipped mullet in Radipole lake, above the sluice gates in Weymouth Harbour, along with some bloody good carp. I have no idea how they got in there, but there's a possibility that they could get through the sluices and into the fresh water lake when the sluice gates are open on spring tides, as I've seen thin lipped mullet running up and over a weir in the River Frome, several miles from the open sea and in pure chalk stream water.
  8. Could it have been Inshore Sport Fishing by Alan Wrangles? I'm a big fan of Hugh Stoker's writings and was very pleased to bump into him one evening some 15 years ago on his local beach near Charmouth. He was spinning for mackerel, just like a page out of one of his books, which I avidly devoured as a teenager. A charming gentleman angler. Cheers Steve
  9. Having considered the science and evidence, and having listened carefully to the concerns of anglers and commercial fishermen, I have decided not to increase the MLS for bass. Bass is important to the inshore fishing fleet, which would have borne the brunt of the cost of increasing the MLS. I could not justify introducing a measure which would have had such an impact on those fishermen given the current pressures they face and the healthy state of the stock at present Jonathan Shaw MP 25th October 2007 I know who I'll blame Steve and it won't be the guys you refer to as RSA mouthpieces.
  10. Hi Steve If you want to shell out £19.15 for the annual report you can get a copy from HM Stationary Office, or you can download a PDF from - http://www.cefas.co.uk/media/133187/cefas_ara_2008-9.pdf. Pages 36 to 43 may answer some of your questions e.g. Defra contracts accounted for 67% of 'turnover' = £38,446,000 (up from £35,375,000 in 07/08) Can you remind me - Who funds Defra? Cefas have a 'High level' contract with Defra until 2016 - I'll let you do the maths. I'm sure you'll be interested in the pension liabilities figures on page 38 and the renumeration report on pages 42 & 43 Ahhhh - Bisto
  11. Hi Steve With hindsight - 'Who are the members of this group?' would have been an ideal question to put to Mark Lloyd at the BASS AGM last Sunday. As someone with the ability to inform significant numbers of RSA readers via your monthly piece in BFM, how about contacting Mark Lloyd or Stuart McPherson for an answer. A quick phone call or email to either of the above gents should clarify things. Cheers Steve
  12. There was a guy from the AT out on a charter boat from Falmouth on the BBC South West news at 6:30 this evening. It looked like the AT arranged the trip to get the subject on the telly. I didn't see all of the report (mowing the b****y lawn) and by the time I got back in the house the AT guy was telling the reporter that the plan was nonesense and would damage the sport fishing industry. The reporter quoted £3 million is spent in the West Country over one bank holiday by visiting anglers. They then went via a video link to a EU fisheries spokeswoman who said that article 47 was necessary to quantify how much bluefin tuna, eels and cod was being taken by recreational fishermen in order to protect the resource from overfishing. Once they knew how much was being taken from the stock, the scientists could advise the managers how much could safely be taken from the fisheries. She left out the bit where the managers would routinely ignore what the scientists advised.
  13. The point of the AT is that you pays your £20 and they do the fighting for you. That's why I've joined - not for the competitions, or the reward scheme or even the £5 mil insurance. If I can rely on the AT to fight my corner on the issues that threaten my enjoyment of our sport and I can get out fishing and catch more and bigger fish as a result, then they can rely on my £20 a year. Having said that - if they ask me to write letters to my MP or to sign a petition or two, then I'll do that if it gets things done, as it can do e.g. the Article 47 debacle. If they carry on as the previous governing body did, then I'll find something else to spend the money on, like another new plug or a few packets of hooks.
  14. Don't worry Glenn - Elton and I are both members and we'll watch 'em like hawks. I've recently saved myself 20 quid a month by stopping my daughter's pocket money. Well she is 23 I've put the money I'm saving towards the AT membership and with the £220 a year left over I've promised myself a trip to Ireland, but I might have to cut the son's pocket money too for a few beers whilst I'm there - He's 24!!!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.