Jump to content

"Detailed Consultations", My Arse!

Elton

By Elton
in Conservation & Politics

 Share

Recommended Posts

Elton Member

Elton

Posted
Posted

Unbelievable:

 

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/mor...icle7087463.ece

Anglers' Net Shopping Partners - Please Support Your Forum

CLICK HERE for all your Amazon purchases - books, photography equipment, DVD's and more!

CLICK HERE for Go Outdoors. HUGE discounts!

 

FOLLOW ANGLERS' NET ON TWITTER- CLICK HERE - @anglersnet

PLEASE 'LIKE' US ON FACEBOOK - CLICK HERE

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Steve Coppolo Member

Steve Coppolo

Posted
Posted

 

That's obviously a typo, Elton. What they probably meant to say was that the byelaws will be imposed following the EA speaking to one, possibly two, people within the Angling Trust and, possibly, one of the not so magnificent 7. Then conducting a tick box excercise and disregarding any comments that didn't support the proposals. An easy enough mistake to make, I suppose. But what can you expect from someone who refers to Zander is a Pike/Perch?

DRUNK DRIVERS WRECK LIVES.

 

Don't drink and drive.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted

Detailed consultation, is this the same one that had the rsa eel take hidden within it. I suspect that it is, so for kick off's the A T hid it even from their own sea committee while working out the ban with the EA and the eel hugging club. So consultation at it's worst. So the whole of this article and the legislation is based on one big lie. Hope they don't find time before unelected brown is finally forced to name the election date tomorow to enable this parliament to be scrapped before yet more un-neccersary rules and regulation is heaped upon the taxpayer.

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jaffa Member

Jaffa

Posted
Posted (edited)

 

And what do the "conservation heroes" that arrange these kind of stories, think they will do politically in the many remote areas that are totally dependant on fishing? I suspect they don't give a damn because they know nothing much. They will reap what they sow though id guess.

Edited by Jaffa

Help predict climate change!

http://climateprediction.net

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted (edited)
That's obviously a typo, Elton. What they probably meant to say was that the byelaws will be imposed following the EA speaking to one, possibly two, people within the Angling Trust and, possibly, one of the not so magnificent 7. Then conducting a tick box excercise and disregarding any comments that didn't support the proposals. An easy enough mistake to make, I suppose. But what can you expect from someone who refers to Zander is a Pike/Perch?

 

 

Well, there appears to be a miniscule, faint, glimmer of hope that someone within the A T has got their brain in gear and seen the situation for what it is, amounst the fog of rules and regulation that the rest of them feed on, can't get enough and crave for more. Well done to this guy for seeing the light. However i would say he is a little condecending in his decription of the 'normal' angler as opposed to the arm chair ones, i can certainly forgive him due to his forsight :)

 

 

 

quote: Re: New Draft EA Bye Laws

John Hepworth Yesterday at 10:42 pm

 

 

With all due respect gents, I doubt that the few eels that anglers take for the pot will have any affect when that small number is compared to the numbers that are caught and killed by the average 'Joe angler' the majority of whom will probably never have read a fisheries bye-law in their life...and never will.

At one time the regional bye-laws (abbreviated) used to be printed on the rod licenses, does the EA honestly believe that the majority of anglers are going to take the trouble of either telephoning or searching web sites to get them.

 

I actually have the NE/Yorkshire & Northumbrian bye-laws on my club web site but in over three years the page has been visited only a couple of dozen times. A few years ago I printed off copies of the abbreviated bye-laws and left them in some local Post Offices to be put out with the rod licenses but hardly any were taken when asked.

The EA can bring in as many bye-laws as they can make up but they wont overnight change attitudes, in-bred almost, likewise with some game anglers killing coarse fish in areas such as Northumbria.

 

_________________

Tight Lines

 

John H

Edited by barry luxton

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.

  I accept