Jump to content

Free yet again.


Andrew

Recommended Posts

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20295754

 

Abu Qatada wins appeal against deportation

"La conclusión es que los insultos sólo perjudican cuando vienen de alguien que respeto". e5006689.gif

“Vescere bracis meis”

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bonkers, accused of conspiricy re bomb attacks, this parasite should never be freed. Not in the public interests, whats up with them all. Worst of all he's a cleric?

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then why, if he is so dangerous, is he not being charged in this country for any crimes he is said to have committed?

he and his family are over here on benifits, including legal aid on a forged passport, illegal immigrants for kick off's, kick the scumbag out.

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Read his wiki. If his past isn't sufficient reason to boot him out, then it's time for a reintroduction of the "act now, shrug later" method of dealing with such b@st@rds.

 

The rule preventing his deportation is there to protect an individual's human rights. Should it still apply if that individual is demonstrably inhuman?

 

EDIT - AND LOOK AT THE FECKING EXPENSE INVOLVED!!! Where's the sense here, people?

Edited by robtherake

"The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and all science. He to whom this emotion is a stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as good as dead: his eyes are closed."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The law applies in an even handed way. The statue on the top of the old bailey (the lady justice) is blindfold to denote this. If there is a human rights law then it applies to all, even people we find reprehensible. If he can't go back because the evidence was obtained under torture then we should look at any crime he has committed here and allow justice to take its course.

take a look at my blog

http://chubcatcher.blogspot.co.uk/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peter, although you are right, it simply doesn't feel like either justice or common sense have been applied here.

"The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and all science. He to whom this emotion is a stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as good as dead: his eyes are closed."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peter, although you are right, it simply doesn't feel like either justice or common sense have been applied here.

fact is we knew a long time ago Jordan was using torture and did not bring it up with them years ago, fair play now that they have put pressure on them to stop this but its too late for this case but hopefully it will help in any future cases.

take a look at my blog

http://chubcatcher.blogspot.co.uk/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Released today.

 

Cannot have a mobile, internet blah blah blah. Cannot consort with a list of persons.

 

What about his family, they will have mobiles, and his extended family will no doubt have internet access.

Edited by Andrew

"La conclusión es que los insultos sólo perjudican cuando vienen de alguien que respeto". e5006689.gif

“Vescere bracis meis”

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fact is we knew a long time ago Jordan was using torture and did not bring it up with them years ago, fair play now that they have put pressure on them to stop this but its too late for this case but hopefully it will help in any future cases.

Its nothing to do with jordan using torture its about us and america using it using jordan and many other countries with low morals and open hands to do it for us ,its been known for centuries it is totally unreliable as a way of getting knowledgeits what extraordinary rendition was about ,we go to war on the excuse they lock up people for years without trials and use torture but happily do it ourselves via third parties ,he himself has been locked up for years without trial we cant have it both ways

Edited by chesters1

Believe NOTHING anyones says or writes unless you witness it yourself and even then your eyes can deceive you

None of this "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" crap it just means i have at least two enemies!

 

There is only one opinion i listen to ,its mine and its ALWAYS right even when its wrong

 

Its far easier to curse the darkness than light one candle

 

Mathew 4:19

Grangers law : anything i say will  turn out the opposite or not happen at all!

Life insurance? you wont enjoy a penny!

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.