Jump to content

Ryford

Members
  • Posts

    113
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ryford

  1. Wurzel, Fish landings, excluding shell fish for 1898 was a bit over 8 million CWT. I suspect that this is not far from today and certainly not four times. Incidentally the "industry" employed a shade under 80,000 men and boys to catch them, which is a shadow of the number employed today for what is in effect, the same amount of fish. Ryford
  2. Hello Challenge, Just for the record, at the annual SFC meeting held at the then Board of Trade (fisheries) on 27 May 1893, that very same topic was discussed. As was other agenda items such as undersized fish, expenses, enforcement, dumping of sludge and scientific research. It would appear that very little has changed. Rgds
  3. Nice to hear that you don't jump on 'em from the top of one of yer ladders.
  4. Oh Dear Steve, you are so far behind the times dear chap. Most responsible sea anglers these days carry a small first aid kit with a tube of Germaline just in case their capture should graze a fin or two on the shingle coming in. I have heard say that some anglers carry a packet of face wipes for when they feel the fish needs a bit of comfort where they prefer to kiss it better as it were. Why they don't use a slice of the Mothers Pride they are carrying at the time mistifies me. One of life's little mysteries I guess. Ryford
  5. I think you will find that Mr Smith was reminded that rod and line caught fish were preferred when used in conjunction with tagging surveys since the survival rate was as good as it could be. A comment that he agreed with by all accounts. Is that comment in the minutes? Was the comment by one SW representative that he felt that the meeting lacked northern angler input recorded? Maybe there has been a meeting with northern anglers already, I dunno. Maybe it was too far for them to travel for their sport where they would have to get up too early to catch the train, not to mention the cost of the fare. Ryford
  6. Would it come as a surprise to you to hear that another group of anglers has met the minister (and not just Defra officials) at a separate meeting to discuss article 47? And that's the ony other one I have heard about. Inless of course you have heard differently. One representative briefed their membership over a week ago so I hear, so there's no secrecy there I am pleased to say. It's my impression that RF did not say what he is being accused of. Ryford
  7. Would it come as a surprise to you to hear that another group of anglers has met the minister (and not Defra officials) at a separate meeting to discuss article 47? And that's the ony other one I have heard about. Inless of course you have heard differently. One representative breifed their membership over a week ago so I hear, so there's no secrecy there I am pleased to say. It's my impression that RF did not say what he is being accused of. Ryford
  8. I am sure there are Steve, but many are unlikely to declare their membership for risk of being pilloried. Ryford
  9. It will be even more interesting to hear what they all have to say if Article 47 goes ahead unchanged. Some even think this to be distinct possibility. Article 47 may have unleashed a monster that has learned to stick up for itself. It may be a good idea to think the unthinkable and begin to work towards getting the very best out of the opportunity. There again somebody may have already suggested that here already. Ryford
  10. Glen, As a matter of interest, did you ask for an invitation? Ryford
  11. Elton, Given your expert knowledge of MCZs and the South West, you might like to offer to the anglers in the area the benefit of your experience. As it happens, in this particular instance, the views are being sought from all sections of the community, and not just those from recognised clubs and organisations. This issue is being debated at a perocial level and clubs are putting forward their views via their club elected officers etc. Ryford
  12. Mike, I am not sure if this will be possible as I understand that in certain areas, the authorities are supervising the cutting up of the vessel as well as the transport of all the scrap to local scrap dealers. Ryford
  13. Hello Peter The real issue with Lyme Bay was not the local fishermen per se, as there had been a long standing gentlemans agreement to protect the reef. What happened at the time when the fuel started to creep up was that the chaps with scallop dredgers decided they would go through on the way back to Brixham. The issue was raised at the Devon SFC, where it was pointed out to the chairman that ICES had advised that scallops were being fished sustainably. There was clearly nothing to stop them and it was made quite clear by the SFC member concerned that they had no intention of stopping. It would be intersting to find out how the small local operators have faired since the clossure. Too soon to get a sensible idea, they may even do well out of it.
  14. Hello Ian, In the Drew report into sea angling in England and Wales for Defra a few years ago, they reported that some 273,000 anglers went abroad to fish every year. I wonder what proportion of those are a member of the NFSA or another sea angling club or federation? It seems to me that since most of these trips will cost in the region of £1000, then it should not be too much of a hardship to join our national representative at the same time. The potential monies gained by this part of our sport would make a significant difference and would allow RSA to represent itself better and more fully. Of course, there are anglers out there who are happy to do nothing. Its very much the same for the trade who seem content to maintain viability by either taking over the competition or getting costs down by outsourcing their product manufacturing overseas.
  15. Maybe we should tear up the Buyers and Sellers and stop recording what is being landed. Just like the good 'ol days.
  16. Hello Challenge, If, as some suspect, that the modernised SFC structure will have a much better, or more clearly defined agenda to deliver and administer, that there will be more accounatbility? How do you think that might take shape where minority member representation could continue to be sidelined in favour of a more powerful user group as has historically been the case. Do you think that any new structure can be truly effective at delivering co-management if the structure in place remains sub-optimal? Do you think that the conduit link to Government, Defra in this case, is fit to act as arbiter in its present form? Regards
  17. One wonders with the amount of UK fish exported by the commercial fishing industry when compared to the number of sea anglers and the vast amount of fish that they catch, thus stimulating the need for bag limits and licenses, who exactly has been feeding the nation all these years. Ryford
  18. I think you will find that the Exeters has been reduced to something of a sandy bump.
  19. An absolute tragedy and my deepest sympathy goes to his widow and family. I have to say that I've never been entirely happy with the idea of trusting my life to this type of product. I grew up using a rigid and will stick with what I have, its a personal thing. Yes it gets in the way, and its harder to get on and off than the paddle to fish, but I know that if I go over and crack my head in the process, I'll stand the best chance possible. Perhaps now, those of use that use them and are to be honest, more vulnerable than many in that we are offshore sitting on an overgrown lunchbox, can take stock and make a much more objective decision about what safety equipment we use, and in the end, trust our lives to. Ryford
  20. One thing that the CF industry forgets about this issue. It is that we are all affected where those involved with transportation of any sort being the worst hit. Why should they expect (and demand) to get preferencial treatment?
  21. Could it be that the relative or close aquaintence of another SFC member complained, suggesting that anglers were getting away with it. If there was a complaint of some description, then the CFO would have no option but to take action. I'm of the view that the whole issue could have been resolved without the vessel being boarded at sea. Ryford
  22. 3.92 and 3.105 could prove interesting
  23. Whilst not tagged, I have seen net caught bass being sold as line caught on a number of occasions.
  24. Hi Paul, Did he explain or give reasons why it was not delieverable? And who was it as a matter if interest? It occurs to me that there are always lots of powerful examples of things that are either impossible or will never happen. One striking example of this is the demise of car manufacturing in Coventry. Who would have given any credence to this back in the early seventies? But here we are, thirty years on and the cars have all but gone. Andy
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.