Jump to content

More violence!

Colin Brett

By Colin Brett
in Non-Fishing Chat

 Share

Recommended Posts

chesters1 Member

chesters1

Posted
Posted (edited)

theres only one cure for those types and car thieves ,catch then and take them into the woods and shoot them through the back of the head ,no-one would care how big the pile was,no-one would name the dispatchers ,a win win conclusion.

you wont cure the worst types so ensure the genes dont go any further.

saw a car thief get caught red handed on telly last night (14 year old) sorry he was saying sorry ,he would be if i caught him he would loose the use of his fooking hands :angry:

its not f-ing joy riding its theft and should be treated like it not that theft is considered much of a crime today when council tax defaulters get worse sentences than muggers

Edited by chesters1

Believe NOTHING anyones says or writes unless you witness it yourself and even then your eyes can deceive you

None of this "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" crap it just means i have at least two enemies!

 

There is only one opinion i listen to ,its mine and its ALWAYS right even when its wrong

 

Its far easier to curse the darkness than light one candle

 

Mathew 4:19

Grangers law : anything i say will  turn out the opposite or not happen at all!

Life insurance? you wont enjoy a penny!

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Brumagem Phil

Guest Brumagem Phil

Posted
Posted

 

The report says the victim started the fight by spitting at the other fellah. Seem like a pair of thugs to me.

 

Additionally, the guys defence admitted he had some kind or emotional or anger issues.......so has he been assessed by a psychiatrist and will he receive any help while inside or will he come out still full of emotional issues but all bitter and twisted from his time inside too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kleinboet Member

kleinboet

Posted
Posted (edited)

I did hear the other day that the courts asked for (and got) privacy in a case where a young yob was breaking into an elderly (70s) gents car. the man ran down his drive and slammed into his car door, costing the thief the loss of 2 fingers on his right hand, a broken leg and a fractured left wrist.

And the T**T had the cheek to tell the police that he wanted to sue the old man!!!

Edited by kleinboet

5460c629-1c4a-480e-b4a4-8faa59fff7d.jpg

 

fishing is nature's medical prescription

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted
I did hear the other day that the courts asked for (and got) privacy in a case where a young yob was breaking into an elderly (70s) gents car. the man ran down his drive and slammed into his car door, costing the thief the loss of 2 fingers on his right hand, a broken leg and a fractured left wrist.

 

Sounds like gratuitous violence to me, bloke his age should know better. :whistling:

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.

  I accept