Jump to content

WOULD YOU BELIVE IT A BLOODY CONGER

big_cod

By big_cod
in Sea Fishing

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Paddy.W. Member

Paddy.W.

Posted
Posted
Oi, Barry, don't forget me,.........conger dangler extrordinaire!

 

We're hoping to plan some conger/ling trips from anchor in the Oirish Sea next year as well!

Good Day Gentelmen

It is good to hear at long last someone intends to sample the hitherto vertually un tapped sorce of sport ay Whitby, I refere of cause to fishing wrecks at anchor.

I believe pationatly that once the learning cerve of anchoring wrecks is gone through there is a great reward to be got with not only Eels but Ling and large Cod.

 

I also believe had he lived the origianal owner of Chieftan intended devoting suitable tides to this stile of fishing and if I am not misstaken was activally engaged

in assembling like minded anglers and equipment to this end.

I can only think were it not for his untimely passing last year would have seen some remarkable results but that was not to be and I am sure we all hope he

intended attempt will yeld the results he was denide.

Regards

Paddy W

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted (edited)
Paddy

 

Had John Breenan not died and was fishing the Achates then I'm sure that he would have had a lot of local anglers willing to try something a little different

First of all Brian here's next years tide tables for Whitby, kindly sent to me.

 

http://www.planetseafishing.com/maps/tides-england-wales/

 

And a good day to you Paddy :D

 

Before John died he spent the last four or five months emailing me describing exactly what his new boat would be doing and also planning for exactly as Paddy has mentioned. I was even invited by John to spend some time with him, unfortunately it did not happen. With Johns discussions the thought of spending a tide or two anchored on the wrecks gets me juices flowing. However something may come of this.

 

 

Must thank the boffins for bringing the web site back on line. :D

Edited by barry luxton

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted

BUMP

 

Brian, give us a bit of room in your email inbox 'cause i would like to have a chat, regards barry :D

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Brian Carragher Member

Brian Carragher

Posted
Posted (edited)

Is hotmail easier, e mail address for that one is briancarragher@hotmail.com , drop me a line and I'll give you some contact details if you like, will clean out PM system tonight after I take a couple of numbers down

Edited by Brian Carragher
Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted
Is hotmail easier, e mail address for that one is briancarragher@hotmail.com , drop me a line and I'll give you some contact details if you like, will clean out PM system tonight after I take a couple of numbers down

 

Cheers Brian will give you an email, bit late home tonight. regards barry

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Worms Member

Worms

Posted
Posted
Cheers Brian will give you an email, bit late home tonight. regards barry

Not the 11th June please I've got a shark trip in Milford!

 

 

 

9th would be better than the 10th as well......my arms will need a rest after the conger bashing.....new multi to try out....good job it's an 80lb class :D

Eating wild caught fish is good for my health, reduces food miles and keeps me fit trying to catch them........it's my choice to do it, not yours to stop me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
n4lly Member

n4lly

Posted
Posted
Not the 11th June please I've got a shark trip in Milford!

 

 

 

9th would be better than the 10th as well......my arms will need a rest after the conger bashing.....new multi to try out....good job it's an 80lb class :D

 

 

I can do June, just need a date to firm it up :)

1509tarpon_75_.gif
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.

  I accept