Jump to content

NEXT WEEK IS THE FIRST TEST OF COALITION

big_cod

By big_cod
in Conservation & Politics

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Bob Shotter Member

Bob Shotter

Posted
Posted
Either you have a problem reading or you are more politically naive than I thought.

 

Nothing wrong with my ability to read what is there as apposed to what you think is there Davey old mate. Even the Garbage Guardian has not on this occasion pointed the finger of suspicion at Margaret here are the only four paragraphs that relate to or mention her name. >>>

 

Sultan, who is crown prince, "has a corrupt interest in all contracts", according to a dispatch from the then British ambassador Willie Morris published in a recent Commons committee report. An accompanying Ministry of Defence briefing paper prepared for the then prime minister Margaret Thatcher describes Prince Sultan as "not highly intelligent ... He has prejudices, is inflexible and imperious, and drives a hard bargain". The Al Yamamah deal, worth £43bn in total, has long been the subject of allegations of secret commissions to Lady Thatcher's son Mark, and to several members of the Saudi royal family. All those involved have always denied the allegations.

 

Sultan, who is crown prince, "has a corrupt interest in all contracts", according to a dispatch from the then British ambassador Willie Morris published in a recent Commons committee report. An accompanying Ministry of Defence briefing paper prepared for the then prime minister Margaret Thatcher describes Prince Sultan as "not highly intelligent ... He has prejudices, is inflexible and imperious, and drives a hard bargain". The Al Yamamah deal, worth £43bn in total, has long been the subject of allegations of secret commissions to Lady Thatcher's son Mark, and to several members of the Saudi royal family. All those involved have always denied the allegations.

 

Those allegations were treated with such concern in Whitehall in 1985, documents reveal, that a copy of the Arab magazine in question was immediately sent in confidence by the Foreign Office to Mrs Thatcher's chief aide at No 10, Charles Powell, with advice that officials "should simply refuse all comment". Yesterday, 20 years on, the MoD at first sought to take the same line. It insisted the Chandler telegram must have been leaked and said "we never comment on leaks". In fact, a copy was released to the National Archives on May 8 by the Department of Trade and Industry.

 

What has Mark Thatcher to do with it?

It has been alleged that Lady Thatcher's son received secret commissions from the deal.

 

The thing we Brits often fail to grasp is this is the way business is conducted in Saudi, where what we in the UK call corruption is there way of doing bonus payments. That's not to say I believe it to be right mind.

 

Tight Lines Bob

Publication2_zpsthmtka6c.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bob Shotter Member

Bob Shotter

Posted
Posted

 

Yet again Davey there is no claim that Baroness Thatcher has done any thing improper certainly not for her own benefit, unlike her son.

The letter to the King that lead him to become an admirer could have contained anything from a bribe to politely pointing out ours was the best deal, whatever it got an export order for the UK. :rolleyes:

Publication2_zpsthmtka6c.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SandTiger Member

SandTiger

Posted
Posted
Yet again Davey there is no claim that Baroness Thatcher has done any thing improper certainly not for her own benefit, unlike her son.

The letter to the King that lead him to become an admirer could have contained anything from a bribe to politely pointing out ours was the best deal, whatever it got an export order for the UK. :rolleyes:

 

 

Does the word Nepotism mean anything to you?

 

Yet again Davey there is no claim that Baroness Thatcher has done any thing improper certainly not for her own benefit, unlike her son.

The letter to the King that lead him to become an admirer could have contained anything from a bribe to politely pointing out ours was the best deal, whatever it got an export order for the UK. :rolleyes:

 

 

Does the word Nepotism mean anything to you?

http://www.mv-stormdrift.co.uk/
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bob Shotter Member

Bob Shotter

Posted
Posted

Does the word Nepotism mean anything to you?

 

Er Davey you said that in stereo. :D:D

 

Are you suggesting that mummy T saw to it her beloved son got a job from which it is claimed he got a mega back hander from the Saudi arms deal. :rolleyes:

 

Conspiracy? B)

 

Got any evidence have you, or is this another of your suppositions, like how the planed changes to the coast guard wont work and will cost lives? :P

Publication2_zpsthmtka6c.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SandTiger Member

SandTiger

Posted
Posted
Er Davey you said that in stereo. :D:D

 

Are you suggesting that mummy T saw to it her beloved son got a job from which it is claimed he got a mega back hander from the Saudi arms deal. :rolleyes:

 

Conspiracy? B)

 

Got any evidence have you, or is this another of your suppositions, like how the planed changes to the coast guard wont work and will cost lives? :P

 

 

Okay, so you really are stupid then. Moving on, is what they are all saying about you true?

http://www.mv-stormdrift.co.uk/
Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted (edited)
Next week is the first test of stab each other in back coalition allready the polls are saying nick clegg is the most unpopullar deputy priminister in history but it also a test of mr cameron he lied all the way to the polls regarding the VATsaying it would hit the poorest does he think the british public are stupid i get a snicky feeling the labour candidate will win home but by how much even the rupert murdock paper the sun is backing labour whats going on are the wheels falling off allready and there is all the job cuts to come yet i say tax the g+tonics in the house :o that might knock a few quid off the country debt.

 

paul.

 

 

Errm, is this the test you are referring to. Some labour mp couldn't bring on them self to stay within the rules. :D

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12143525

 

Have a look at some of the candidates that the conservatives are up against. They must be terrified.

 

Debbie Abrahams (Labour)

Derek Adams (British National Party)

Kashif Ali (Conservative)

Peter Allen (Green Party)

David Bishop (Bus-Pass Elvis Party)

The Flying Brick (Monster Raving Loony Party)

Loz Kaye (Pirate Party of the United Kingdom)

Stephen Morris (English Democrats)

Paul Nuttall MEP (UK Independence Party)

Elwyn Watkins (Liberal Democrats)

Edited by barry luxton

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.

  I accept