Jump to content

Cancer - some thoughts


Newt

Recommended Posts

I have noticed over the years I've been posting on here that many of our members have either had or been directly affected by cancer. Cliff (CSJ2) and the situation with his better-half, Hazel, is simply the latest one in a long list of good folks who have had bad things happening.

 

This may be partly a result of the ready support available from AN posters who will happily fight about fish, conservation, animal rights, and nearly any other topic you can imagine but who will also close ranks and offer caring support for members facing personal hardships.

 

It is a good thing to see (the support) but I found myself wondering why some many of our members seem to have been affected (personally or a close relative) by the disease. I wonder if the information presented in This Page might be of interest and if anyone has other ideas/thoughts/etc.

" My choices in life were either to be a piano player in a whore house or a politician. And to tell the truth, there's hardly any difference!" - Harry Truman, 33rd US President

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting read. No less than twelve people in my family have died through cancer in three different generations most bowel cancer two skin cancer .one only three weeks ago. We are told that it could be genetic.My Owd fella 80 reckons it could be due to the fact that all of them worked in the cotton mills all of their lives plus the breathing of all the fumes from the times when coal was burned for fuel . I personally think that fall out from the Bomb testing when they were younger on top of natural radiation plus vehicle emmissions hve their part to play.

Number me with Rage it,s a shame Number me in Haste its a shame

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's just a fact of how many people actually get struck down with cancer as much as anything else. There's a lot of people on this forum and odds are that some of them get and die from cancer. On a plus side it does seem to bring out the best in people and hopefully bring a small bit of comfort for those unfortunate to be directly affected.

 

Rob.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My mate works for a pensions company. He gets to see quite a few death certificates, and nearly all of them (bar people being killed in an accident) have "Carcinoma" as the SECONDARY cause of death! Fisrt is normally organ failure, but the cancer causes the organ failure! Therefore, most people die of cancer, but not everyone knows that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My mate works for a pensions company. He gets to see quite a few death certificates, and nearly all of them (bar people being killed in an accident) have "Carcinoma" as the SECONDARY cause of death! Fisrt is normally organ failure, but the cancer causes the organ failure! Therefore, most people die of cancer, but not everyone knows that.

Can't be sure, but he may have misinterpeted the use of the word 'Secondary'.

 

From what we were told after our mother died, most cancers that kill, are 'secondary' cancers!

 

Our mother's death certificate was word something like: "Cause of death; Secondary carcinoma of the liver, the primary was never found, possibly in the bowel"

 

Our doctor told us that most primary cancers are in the bowel in this country.

https://www.harbourbridgelakes.com/


Pisces mortui solum cum flumine natant

You get more bites on Anglers Net

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The stats for cancer are absolutely shocking when you actually think about it. Approximately 1 in 4 will suffer and along with heart disease it is one of our biggest threats. Life deals some mean cards and can be really cruel. We just have to accept it's the way it is and hope that modern medicine and technology will be able to help us take steps to overcome this nasty disease.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you live long enough you will eventually develop cancer. For most of our evolutionary history most people have not lived long enough for it to be an issue. The more that we eliminate other causes of death the more often cancer will be the thing that eventually carries us away. It's like throwing a many-sided die every year, and every year the number of sides with a big C on them increases slightly. I'm not being defeatist; there are ways of reducing the risk through the way we live our lives, ways of reducing the number of sides on the die with a C, but if we live long enough eventually we're all going to throw one.

 

At the end of the day, we all must die of something.

Edited by Steve Walker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't be sure, but he may have misinterpeted the use of the word 'Secondary'.

 

From what we were told after our mother died, most cancers that kill, are 'secondary' cancers!

 

Our mother's death certificate was word something like: "Cause of death; Secondary carcinoma of the liver, the primary was never found, possibly in the bowel"

 

Our doctor told us that most primary cancers are in the bowel in this country.

 

I don't think so, in this instance it sounds correct. Death certificates just detail causes of death not the sequence of events. They would therefore not be concerned with whether the fatal cancer was a primary or secondary tumour.

 

Rob.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting read Newt, doing a fair amount of fishing over the years and meeting a number of old salts who looked liked dried prunes but lived to good old ages there could well be a bases for taking in a bit of sunshine. :sun:

 

As kids my family including adaults throughout the extended family were all sun worshippers nipping of to the beach at every oportunity and none have died from cancer, most live to a ripe old age, I have a great aunt of 103, my gran died at 99 and I have several uncles in their late eighties. Another interesting fact is most of the men smoke.

 

It does make me wonder having read that report.

I fish, I catches a few, I lose a few, BUT I enjoys. Anglers Trust PM

 

eat.gif

 

http://www.petalsgardencenter.com

 

Petals Florist

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think so, in this instance it sounds correct. Death certificates just detail causes of death not the sequence of events. They would therefore not be concerned with whether the fatal cancer was a primary or secondary tumour.

 

I think that's correct. Unlike a heart attack, which can kill you outright, cancer normally has a gradual effect on vital organs, so that the primary cause of death might be, for example, liver or kidney failure secondary to carcinoma.

 

Whilst it's true that cancer is primarily a disease of the elderly, I do seem to know of a lot of middle-aged people who've died from it in the last 10-20 years. I do also think that genetic susceptibility has a lot to do with your individual risk of getting it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.